Release 5
FoundationThis page is part of the FHIR Specification (v5.0.0: R5 - STU). This is the current published version. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions 
. Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3 R2
| FHIR Infrastructure Work Group | Maturity Level: Normative | Standards Status: Normative |
Many of the defined elements in a resource are references to other resources. Using these references, the resources combine to build a web of information about healthcare.
References are always defined and represented in one direction - from one resource (source) to another (target). The corresponding reverse relationship from the target to the source exists in a logical sense, but is not typically represented explicitly in the target resource. For external references, navigating these reverse relationships requires some external infrastructure to track the relationship between resources (the REST API provides one such infrastructure by providing the ability to search the reverse relationship by naming search parameters for the references and by providing support for reverse includes).
Because resources are processed independently, relationships are not considered to be transitive. For example, if a Procedure resource references a Patient as its subject, and has a Condition resource as its reason, there is no automatic rule or implication that the condition has the same patient for its subject. Instead, the subject of the condition must be established directly in the Condition resource itself. Another way to state this is that the context of the subject is not "inherited", nor does it "conduct" along the relationship to condition. The only exception to this is the case of contained resources (see below). Note that in practice, the relationships need to describe a logical and coherent record, and in the case of the Condition and Procedure described here, they would usually be required to have the same patient for their subjects. Profiles and/or implementation guides may make rules about this (also see GraphDefinition).
This specification describes the use of references to other resources that have the same FHIR version as the source of the reference. Expected behavior for references across FHIR versions is presently undefined.
References are made to resource based on their identity; there are several different identities to refer to.
Resources contain two types of references to other resources:
For canonical references, see below. The general references are handled by the Reference type.
| FHIR Infrastructure Work Group | Maturity Level: 5 | Standards Status: Normative |
See also Detailed Descriptions, Profiles, Extensions and R4 Conversions
The Reference type contains at least one of a reference (literal reference),
an identifier (logical reference), and a display (text description of target).
In addition, it may contain a target type.
Structure
| Name | Flags | Card. | Type | Description & Constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  Reference | ΣN | Element | A reference from one resource to another + Rule: SHALL have a contained resource if a local reference is provided + Rule: At least one of reference, identifier and display SHALL be present (unless an extension is provided). Elements defined in Ancestors: id, extension | |
  reference | ΣC | 0..1 | string | Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL |
| type | Σ | 0..1 | uri | Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") - must be a resource in resources Binding: Resource Types (Extensible) |
 identifier | ΣC | 0..1 | Identifier | Logical reference, when literal reference is not known |
 display | ΣTC | 0..1 | string | Text alternative for the resource |
| Documentation for this format | ||||
UML Diagram (Legend)
XML Template
<Reference xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> <!-- from Element: extension --> <reference value="[string]"/><!-- I 0..1 Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL --> <type value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..1 Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") - must be a resource in resources --> <identifier><!-- I 0..1 Identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known --></identifier> <display value="[string]"/><!-- I 0..1 Text alternative for the resource --> </Reference>
JSON Template
{
// from Element: extension
"reference" : "<string>", // I Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
"type" : "<uri>", // Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") - must be a resource in resources
"identifier" : { Identifier }, // I Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
"display" : "<string>" // I Text alternative for the resource
}
Turtle Template
@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> . [ # from Element: Element.extension fhir:reference [ string ] ; # 0..1 I Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL fhir:type [ uri ] ; # 0..1 Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") - must be a resource in resources fhir:identifier [ Identifier ] ; # 0..1 I Logical reference, when literal reference is not known fhir:display [ string ] ; # 0..1 I Text alternative for the resource ]
Changes since Release 3
Changes from both R4 and R4B
| Reference | |
| Reference.type |
|
See the Full Difference for further information
Structure
| Name | Flags | Card. | Type | Description & Constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | ΣN | Element | A reference from one resource to another + Rule: SHALL have a contained resource if a local reference is provided + Rule: At least one of reference, identifier and display SHALL be present (unless an extension is provided). Elements defined in Ancestors: id, extension | |
| reference | ΣC | 0..1 | string | Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL |
| type | Σ | 0..1 | uri | Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") - must be a resource in resources Binding: Resource Types (Extensible) |
| identifier | ΣC | 0..1 | Identifier | Logical reference, when literal reference is not known |
| display | ΣTC | 0..1 | string | Text alternative for the resource |
| Documentation for this format | ||||
XML Template
<Reference xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> <!-- from Element: extension --> <reference value="[string]"/><!-- I 0..1 Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL --> <type value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..1 Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") - must be a resource in resources --> <identifier><!-- I 0..1 Identifier Logical reference, when literal reference is not known --></identifier> <display value="[string]"/><!-- I 0..1 Text alternative for the resource --> </Reference>
JSON Template
{
// from Element: extension
"reference" : "<string>", // I Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL
"type" : "<uri>", // Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") - must be a resource in resources
"identifier" : { Identifier }, // I Logical reference, when literal reference is not known
"display" : "<string>" // I Text alternative for the resource
}
Turtle Template
@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> . [ # from Element: Element.extension fhir:reference [ string ] ; # 0..1 I Literal reference, Relative, internal or absolute URL fhir:type [ uri ] ; # 0..1 Type the reference refers to (e.g. "Patient") - must be a resource in resources fhir:identifier [ Identifier ] ; # 0..1 I Logical reference, when literal reference is not known fhir:display [ string ] ; # 0..1 I Text alternative for the resource ]
Changes since Release 3
Changes from both R4 and R4B
| Reference | |
| Reference.type |
|
See the Full Difference for further information
Constraints
| id | Level | Location | Description | Expression |
 ref-1 | Rule | (base) | SHALL have a contained resource if a local reference is provided | reference.exists() implies (reference.startsWith('#').not() or (reference.substring(1).trace('url') in %rootResource.contained.id.trace('ids')) or (reference='#' and %rootResource!=%resource)) |
| ref-2 | Rule | (base) | At least one of reference, identifier and display SHALL be present (unless an extension is provided). | reference.exists() or identifier.exists() or display.exists() or extension.exists() |
Also note that in resources, a Reference SHALL point to another resource,
and Reference.type, if it is present, SHALL be a valid non-abstract resource
(references and reference.type MAY refer to non-resource content in logical models).
In resources, a Reference always points to another resource, which has
a fixed and known type. If appropriate, this type can be specified in the reference
itself. In principle, the type of the target reference can be determined by resolving
the reference (using the approaches described below), and examining the content
returned to determine the type; for this reason, specifying the type is almost always
duplication of information. However, resolving references may be a very slow
operation, or impossible in practice due to various practical concerns. For this
reason, the reference may indicate directly the target resource type:
"subject": {
"reference" : "http://someserver/some-path",
"type" : "Patient"
}
When the type is provided directly, it SHALL agree with the type determined by resolving the resource.
Note that in practice, it is often not necessary to know the type of the target resource is, unless it's going to be resolved anyway, so in many cases, specifying the type of the target resource is unnecessary.
In order to support Logical Models,
the type element has the type of "uri". Whenever type
appears in resources, the uri is represented relative to the base URI
http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/. For resources, then, the
value is simply a code that is the type of resource - e.g. "Patient".
The reference is the key element - resources are identified and addressed by their URL. It
contains a URL that is either
Bundle.entry.fullUrl (see Resolving References in Bundles)Notes:
((http|https):\/\/([A-Za-z0-9\-\\\.\:\%\$]*\/)+)?(Account|ActivityDefinition|ActorDefinition|AdministrableProductDefinition|AdverseEvent|AllergyIntolerance|Appointment|AppointmentResponse|ArtifactAssessment|AuditEvent|Basic|Binary|BiologicallyDerivedProduct|BiologicallyDerivedProductDispense|BodyStructure|Bundle|CapabilityStatement|CarePlan|CareTeam|ChargeItem|ChargeItemDefinition|Citation|Claim|ClaimResponse|ClinicalImpression|ClinicalUseDefinition|CodeSystem|Communication|CommunicationRequest|CompartmentDefinition|Composition|ConceptMap|Condition|ConditionDefinition|Consent|Contract|Coverage|CoverageEligibilityRequest|CoverageEligibilityResponse|DetectedIssue|Device|DeviceAssociation|DeviceDefinition|DeviceDispense|DeviceMetric|DeviceRequest|DeviceUsage|DiagnosticReport|DocumentReference|Encounter|EncounterHistory|Endpoint|EnrollmentRequest|EnrollmentResponse|EpisodeOfCare|EventDefinition|Evidence|EvidenceReport|EvidenceVariable|ExampleScenario|ExplanationOfBenefit|FamilyMemberHistory|Flag|FormularyItem|GenomicStudy|Goal|GraphDefinition|Group|GuidanceResponse|HealthcareService|ImagingSelection|ImagingStudy|Immunization|ImmunizationEvaluation|ImmunizationRecommendation|ImplementationGuide|Ingredient|InsurancePlan|InventoryItem|InventoryReport|Invoice|Library|Linkage|List|Location|ManufacturedItemDefinition|Measure|MeasureReport|Medication|MedicationAdministration|MedicationDispense|MedicationKnowledge|MedicationRequest|MedicationStatement|MedicinalProductDefinition|MessageDefinition|MessageHeader|MolecularSequence|NamingSystem|NutritionIntake|NutritionOrder|NutritionProduct|Observation|ObservationDefinition|OperationDefinition|OperationOutcome|Organization|OrganizationAffiliation|PackagedProductDefinition|Patient|PaymentNotice|PaymentReconciliation|Permission|Person|PlanDefinition|Practitioner|PractitionerRole|Procedure|Provenance|Questionnaire|QuestionnaireResponse|RegulatedAuthorization|RelatedPerson|RequestOrchestration|Requirements|ResearchStudy|ResearchSubject|RiskAssessment|Schedule|SearchParameter|ServiceRequest|Slot|Specimen|SpecimenDefinition|StructureDefinition|StructureMap|Subscription|SubscriptionStatus|SubscriptionTopic|Substance|SubstanceDefinition|SubstanceNucleicAcid|SubstancePolymer|SubstanceProtein|SubstanceReferenceInformation|SubstanceSourceMaterial|SupplyDelivery|SupplyRequest|Task|TerminologyCapabilities|TestPlan|TestReport|TestScript|Transport|ValueSet|VerificationResult|VisionPrescription)\/[A-Za-z0-9\-\.]{1,64}(\/_history\/[A-Za-z0-9\-\.]{1,64})?(#[A-Za-z0-9\-\.]{1,64})?
|[version] syntax part of the canonical reference is not supportedA relative reference to the Patient "034AB16" in an element named subject on a FHIR RESTful server:
<subject>
<reference value="Patient/034AB16" />
</subject>
An absolute reference to a Structure Definition in an element named profile:
{
"profile" : {
"reference" : "http://fhir.hl7.org/svc/StructureDefinition/c8973a22-2b5b-4e76-9c66-00639c99e61b"
}
}
Note that in a bundle during a transaction, reference URLs may actually contain logical URIs (e.g. OIDs or UUIDSs) that resolve within the transaction. When processing the transaction, the server replaces the logical URL with what is the correct literal URL at the completion of the transaction.
References can be version specific - that is, a reference may point to a specific version of a resource. e.g.:
<target>
<reference value="http://example.org/fhir/Observation/1x2/_history/2" />
</target>
or
<target>
<reference value="Observation/1x2/_history/2" />
</target>
This is usually associated with audit trail or provenance information where it is important to reference a specific version of a record, not the most current information.
In many contexts where FHIR is used, applications building a resource may know an identifier for the target of the reference, but there is no way for the application to convert this to a literal reference that directly references an actual resource. This situation may arise for several reasons:
For further discussion of the use of identifiers on resources, see Consistent Resource Identification. In these cases, the source application may provide the identifier as a logical reference to the entity that the target resource would describe.
A logical reference to the Patient with an SSN of 000111111:
<patient>
<identifier>
<system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/sid/us-ssn" />
<value value="000111111" />
</identifier>
</patient>
There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed or
exists as a FHIR instance (except, of course, that the reference will need to be resolved to a
target resource if any information from it is required in a FHIR context).
The reference SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a
FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference
For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if
the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for
Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists
(where the type is Reference (Any).
When processing a resource, an application may be able to use the identifier directly, on the grounds that all it needs is the identifier, or it may be able to resolve the identifier directly. Alternatively, it may be able to use a server to resolve the logical reference to a literal reference to a resource.
Irrespective of how the resolution occurs, any system processing a logical reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not.
For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able to automatically resolve the reference, nor does, for example, aggregation restrictions. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy.
When both logical and literal references are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference, if they understand how to resolve the logical reference.
Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present; or may remove it.
Irrespective of whether a literal and/or logical reference is provided, or neither, the
display element may be used to provide a very short description of the
target resource.
<custodian>
<reference value="Organization/123" />
<display value="HL7, Inc" />
</custodian>
This text can be used by any application that cannot resolve the reference to fill out the text portion of a hyperlink referring to the target resource, for instance. It can also save time fetching a target resource and determining how to convert it to a very short textual description.
In general, the display, if populated, does not have identical content
to the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's
being referenced, not to more fully describe it.
Many resource types have a defined element "url" which is the canonical URL that always identifies the resource across all contexts of use. Typically, terminology, conformance or knowledge resources have canonical URLs. The canonical URL is the preferred way to reference a resource instance for the resource types on which it is defined. See Canonical Resource Identity for further information.
References to canonical URLs use the canonical type to refer to
the url element on the conformance/knowledge resources (which has the type uri):
<valueSet value="http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/my-valueset"/>
Note the exception to this rule: if the target resource is contained in another resource, which is referencing it, then the canonical
URL is a fragment identifier referring to the target resource by its id (see below).
References of type canonical may include a version, in order to be precise about which version of the
resource is being referred to. To do this, append the version to the reference with a '|' like this:
<valueSet value="http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/my-valueset|0.8"/>
Resolving this pipe ('|') syntax is equivalent to using a GET with the version parameter:
GET fhir/ValueSet?url=http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/my-valueset&version=0.8
Both of these examples specify version 0.8 of the value set, by ValueSet.version
(The canonical URL full format is {{CanonicalResource.url}}|{{CanonicalResource.version}}).
Note that these examples do not relate to ValueSet.meta.versionId.
Note that if a canonical URL reference does not have a version, and the server finds multiple versions for the value set, the system using the reference should pick the latest version of the target resource and use that. Servers SHOULD support version specific searching for canonical URLs by automatically detecting the presence of a |[version] and performing the appropriate search. Additional notes about searching on versioned references to canonical URLs:
Systems resolving references to canonical URLs SHOULD first try to resolve the reference using the canonical reference (e.g. search on a known registry of terminology, conformance, or knowledge resources as appropriate), and then fall back to direct resolution using the URL as a literal reference if a local version of the canonical resource cannot be found. This approach is safe because the approaches must refer to the same artifact, though implementations will need to make appropriate arrangements regarding the version and/or currency of their local copy of the artifact.
The following resources have canonical URLs and are allowed to be the target of references to a canonical URLs:
A few elements that have references to canonical URLs have a targetProfile of http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Resource,
which is shown as canonical(Any) in this specification. Such references SHALL only reference one of these types of resources.
When evaluating a canonical reference, a server may find that it has multiple matching resources. This may arise because:
http://example.org/CodeSystem/abchttp://example.org/CodeSystem/abc|1.2 matches both versions 1.2.1 and 1.2.3-drafthttp://example.org/CodeSystem/abc|1.2.2 and the server had two different resources for version 1.2.2 The last case is generally regarded as an error - if the content of the resource changes, the version should too. But in this case the error is likely with the editorial process, not the server handling the content (this specific situation has happened by mistake several times in the FHIR Implementation Guide publishing ecosystem in spite of process safeguards intended to prevent it). But the other two cases are not considered errors; they are how the system is intended to work, and the client is purposefully delegating to the server the task of determining the correct version to use. In general, the correct version to use is the latest version approved for production use. This specification does not define the algorithm for servers to use to determine the latest version. In principle, the server chooses based on the following information from the resources:
Version practices, dateTime, etc.
Canonical resources are not required to use Semver, though HL7 recommends using
it, and follows SemVer for its own content. However, other publishers of canonical resources
follow other practices, and some kind of date based versioning schemes are not unsual.
Servers may have access to additional information or policy guidance that determines which
resource to choose as the default, and additional knowledge about how to reason with
the versioning scheme in use.
Because determining the 'current' version when the algorithm is unknown is problematic, canonical resources SHOULD declare the versionAlgorithm[x] element to instruct servers on what altorithm to use for comparison. In the absence of this element, servers MAY choose to guess the algorithm or use their own default logic to determine which resource to return in the event there are multiple candidate instances with the same canonical URL.
Canonical references may include a fragment when the reference is to a contained resource. When the target of a canonical reference is a contained resource, the canonical reference will have a fragment as part of the URL:
<valueSet value="http://fhir.acme.com/Questionnaire/example|1.0#vs1"/>
This is a reference to the value set with id "vs1" in version 1.0 of the identified questionnaire. The common case for this is internal references:
<answerValueSet value="#vs1"/>
Which is the form for references to the contained value set inside the above example questionnaire.
References between resources create a challenge when rendering resource narratives: the narrative includes information from the target resources. As an example, consider an Observation with a patient reference:
{
"resourceType" : "Observation",
"subject" : {
"reference" : "Patient/example"
}
}
When represented in XHTML, this reference will generally become something like:
... <p>Patient: <a href="Patient/example">Peter James CHALMERS (12345)</a></p> ...
This implies that the system generating the resource narrative will need to resolve the reference and generate a summary, or that the reference will contain the information (generated by an application that is able to resolve the reference):
{
"resourceType" : "Observation",
"subject" : {
"reference" : "Patient/example",
"display" : "Peter James CHALMERS (12345)"
}
}
Narrative that contains information derived from other resources like this is still regarded as 'generated' (for Narrative.status).
It's not mandatory to generate narrative this way. Narrative may be generated like this:
... <p>Patient: <a href="Patient/example">(link)</a></p> ...
However, users generally prefer a more informative narrative, so this is not always acceptable.
Applications (and networks of applications) will need some kind of systematic approach for resolving references and/or maintaining the currency of narratives as the resources they reference are changed. The exact details of this are out of scope for the FHIR standard.
Applications are encouraged to use the Reference.display element
to store a user presentable representation of the resource for when the
resource cannot be resolved (e.g. due to network errors). The canonical
type does not have a display element because applications are generally expected
to carry cached copies of the resources that are the target of the canonical
references. If this functionality is still needed or desired anyway, the
Rendered Value extension can be
used.
In some circumstances, the content referred to in the resource reference does not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains it - it cannot be identified independently, and nor can it have its own independent transaction scope. Typically, such circumstances arise where resources are being assembled by a secondary user of the source data, such as a middleware engine. If the data available when the resource is constructed does not include record keys or absolute identification information, then a properly identified resource cannot be assembled, and even if an arbitrary identification was associated with it, the resource could never be the subject of a transaction outside the context of the resource that refers to it.
For example, consider a situation where an interface engine is creating a Condition
record on a patient from an HL7 V2 message, and the only information about the primary surgeon is her
first name and last name (REL-7.2 & REL-7.3). In the absence of a controlled practitioner directory,
this is not enough information to create an identified Practitioner
resource since more than one practitioner might have the same name.
In these circumstances, the resource is placed directly in-line in the resource. This SHOULD NOT be done when the content can be identified properly, as once the identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. The FHIR version of a contained resource SHALL always be the same as the resource that contains it.
An example of a contained resource:
<Condition xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<contained>
<Practitioner>
<id value="p1"/>
<name>
<family value="Person"/>
<given value="Patricia"/>
</name>
</Practitioner>
</contained>
<!-- other attributes -->
<asserter>
<reference value="#p1" />
</asserter>
<!-- other attributes -->
</Condition>
The same example in JSON:
{
"resourceType" : "Condition",
"contained": [
{
"resourceType" : "Practitioner",
"id" : "p1",
"name" : [{
"family" : "Person",
"given" : ["Patricia"]
}]
}],
"asserter" : {
"reference" : "#p1"
}
}
Implementation Note: Contained resources are still a reference rather than being inlined directly into the element that is the reference (e.g. "asserter" above) to ensure that a single approach to resolving resource references can be used. Though direct containment would seem simpler, it would still be necessary to support internal references where the same contained resource is referenced more than once. In the end, all that it would achieve is creating additional options in the syntax. For users using XPath to process the resource, the following XPath fragment resolves the internal reference:
ancestor::f:[not(parent::f:*)]/f:contained/[f:id/@value=substring-after(current()/f:reference/@value, '#')]
Some notes about use and interpretation of contained resources:
contained element SHALL NOT have extensions on it (though contained resources can still contain extensions).Reference and canonical types may refer to contained resourcesmeta.versionId, meta.lastUpdated, or meta.security.meta.tag, though there are many tags that do not make sense on contained resources.[type]/[id]/_history/[version]#[containedId]), but it's
not possible to refer to a version of a contained resource (i.e. this is invalid:
[type]/[id]#[containedId]/_history/[version])Like other resources, contained resources can contain narrative. However, when rendering the containing resource, the narrative of the contained resources is ignored, so relevant information about contained resources SHALL appear in the narrative of the containing resource.
Resources that are contained inline do not "inherit" context from their parent resource. For instance, if the parent resource contains a "subject", and the contained resource also has a "subject" element defined, there is no implication that the contained resource has the same subject as the parent resource.
Resources can only be contained in other resources if there is a reference from the resource to the contained resource, or if the contained resource references the container resource. This is intended to ensure that the meaning of the contained resource is clear, and that there is no confusion as to its significance.
For a resource that references the container, the reference is "#", like this:
<Patient xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<id value="something"/>
<contained>
<Provenance>
<!-- no id necessary (though still allowed) -->
<target>
<reference value="#"/>
</target>
</Provenance>
</contained>
<!-- other attributes -->
</Patient>
Note to Implementers: There is no way to search for contained resources that reference their container. Is this a problem?
Feedback is welcome here
Some references are circular - that is, the reference points to another resource of the same type. There are several reasons why a resource may refer to other resources of the same type:
For parameters where the relationship is a strict hierarchy (i.e. where it would be wrong to have circular references, even transitively), there is additional search support for traversing the hierarchy using :above and :below modifiers on the search parameters.
Hierarchical references with search parameters (can have :above and :below modifiers on search parameters):
References that may refer back to the source instance:
References for which the hierarchical behavior is not specified:
| FHIR Infrastructure Work Group | Maturity Level: 5 | Standards Status: Draft |
See also Detailed Descriptions, Profiles, Extensions and R4 Conversions
A common pattern in healthcare records is that a single element may refer to either a concept in principle, or a specific instance of the concept as seen in practice. For instance, a medication may be prescribed because the patient has a headache - e.g. to refer to a headache by a SNOMED CT code for a kind of headache. Alternatively, the record may refer to a specific observation or problem in the problem list as evidence for the patient's headache, which conveys details specific to the patient. This is a particular example of a more general pattern; e.g. it also applies to locations (something happened 'in a hospital', vs something happened in a particular identified hospital).
The CodeableReference datatype represents this pattern, and may be bound to a value set to
allow for a conceptual representation. In such cases, the value set
binding actually applies to the concept element as it usually would for a
CodeableConcept. Alternatively, the CodeableReference
datatype can refer to another resource, and the list of valid target types for the CodeableReference resource
applies to the Reference as described above.
In principle, this datatype allows for either a reference or a concept, or both. If both are present, they are expected to be consistent with each other - e.g. the concept is to a code for headache, and the resource reference describes a headache. Note that it is not generally computably proveable whether this is true or not.
The targetProfile and binding constraints on the CodeableReference apply to the CodeableReference.reference or the CodeableReference.concept
respectively as appropriate and they SHALL NOT be specified directly on the .reference or .concept elements.
When we have experience with implementation practice, we will evaluate changing the SHOULD NOT to a SHALL NOT.
This datatype can be constrained in profiles so that only concept or reference are allowed, and profiles can restrict the bound value sets and allowed target resource types.
This datatype is mostly used for reason for an action.
Structure
| Name | Flags | Card. | Type | Description & Constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CodeableReference | ΣD | Element | Reference to a resource or a concept Elements defined in Ancestors: id, extension | |
| concept | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | Reference to a concept (by class) |
 reference | Σ | 0..1 | Reference() | Reference to a resource (by instance) |
| Documentation for this format | ||||
UML Diagram (Legend)
XML Template
<CodeableReference xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> <!-- from Element: extension --> <concept><!-- 0..1 CodeableConcept Reference to a concept (by class) --></concept> <reference><!-- 0..1 Reference Reference to a resource (by instance) --></reference> </CodeableReference>
JSON Template
{
// from Element: extension
"concept" : { CodeableConcept }, // Reference to a concept (by class)
"reference" : { Reference } // Reference to a resource (by instance)
}
Turtle Template
@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> . [ # from Element: Element.extension fhir:concept [ CodeableConcept ] ; # 0..1 Reference to a concept (by class) fhir:reference [ Reference ] ; # 0..1 Reference to a resource (by instance) ]
Changes since Release 3
Changes from both R4 and R4B
This complex-type did not exist in Release R4
See the Full Difference for further information
Structure
| Name | Flags | Card. | Type | Description & Constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CodeableReference | ΣD | Element | Reference to a resource or a concept Elements defined in Ancestors: id, extension | |
| concept | Σ | 0..1 | CodeableConcept | Reference to a concept (by class) |
| reference | Σ | 0..1 | Reference() | Reference to a resource (by instance) |
| Documentation for this format | ||||
XML Template
<CodeableReference xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> <!-- from Element: extension --> <concept><!-- 0..1 CodeableConcept Reference to a concept (by class) --></concept> <reference><!-- 0..1 Reference Reference to a resource (by instance) --></reference> </CodeableReference>
JSON Template
{
// from Element: extension
"concept" : { CodeableConcept }, // Reference to a concept (by class)
"reference" : { Reference } // Reference to a resource (by instance)
}
Turtle Template
@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> . [ # from Element: Element.extension fhir:concept [ CodeableConcept ] ; # 0..1 Reference to a concept (by class) fhir:reference [ Reference ] ; # 0..1 Reference to a resource (by instance) ]
Changes since Release 3
Changes from both R4 and R4B
This complex-type did not exist in Release R4
See the Full Difference for further information
Constraints
FHIR ®© HL7.org 2011+. FHIR R5 hl7.fhir.core#5.0.0 generated on Sun, Mar 26, 2023 15:26+1100.
Links: Search |
Version History |
Contents |
Glossary |
QA |
Compare to R4 |
Compare to R4B |
|
Propose a change