This page is part of the Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide (v1.0.0-ballot: STU1 Ballot 1) based on FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) v5.0.0. . For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
Generated Narrative: ArtifactAssessment
Resource ArtifactAssessment "179469" Version "14" Updated "2023-12-06 11:04:06+0000"
Profile: RecommendationJustification
Artifact URL: https://fevir.net/resources/ArtifactAssessment/179469
Artifact Description: An example using the ArtifactAssessment Resource for representation of the many judgments and concepts used to justify a recommendation.
identifier: FEvIR Object Identifier: 179469
title: Justification for Recommendation: ADA Obesity Management Recommendation 8.16
citeAs: Justification for Recommendation: ADA Obesity Management Recommendation 8.16 [ArtifactAssessment]. Contributors: In: Fast Evidence Interoperability Resources (FEvIR) Platform, FOI 179469. Revised 2023-11-24. Available at: https://fevir.net/resources/ArtifactAssessment/179469. Computable resource at: https://fevir.net/resources/ArtifactAssessment/179469.
artifact: PlanDefinition/179468: PlanDefinition for Recommendation: ADA Obesity Management Recommendation 8.16
content
informationType: container
summary: 8.16 Metabolic surgery should be a recommended option to treat type 2 diabetes in screened surgical candidates with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 (BMI ≥37.5 kg/m2 in Asian Americans) and in adults with BMI 35.0–39.9 kg/m2 (32.5–37.4 kg/m2 in Asian Americans) who do not achieve durable weight loss and improvement in comorbidities (including hyperglycemia) with nonsurgical methods. A
type: Recommendation Specification (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-content0; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#recommendation-specification)
RelatedArtifacts
Type Classifier Citation ResourceReference derived-from Guideline (), Citation Resource () 8. Obesity Management for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021 [Journal Article]. Contributors: American Diabetes Association. In: Diabetes care, PMID 33298419. Published January 2021. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33298419/. Citation/32137: JournalArticleCitation: ADA 2021 Standards of Medical Care 8. Obesity Management for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes freeToShare: true
component
informationType: comment
summary: 8.16 Metabolic surgery should be a recommended option to treat type 2 diabetes in screened surgical candidates with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 (BMI ≥37.5 kg/m2 in Asian Americans) and in adults with BMI 35.0–39.9 kg/m2 (32.5–37.4 kg/m2 in Asian Americans) who do not achieve durable weight loss and improvement in comorbidities (including hyperglycemia) with nonsurgical methods. A
type: Recommendation Statement (Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#recommendation-statement)
freeToShare: true
component
informationType: classifier
type: Rating System (Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#rating-system)
classifier: ADA Level of Evidence ()
freeToShare: true
component
type: Strength of Recommendation (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1000; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#strength-of-recommendation)
freeToShare: true
component
type: Direction of Recommendation (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1014; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#direction-of-recommendation)
classifier: Favors intervention (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-2021)
freeToShare: true
component
type: Ratings (Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#ratings)
classifier: A ()
freeToShare: true
component
type: Discussion (Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#discussion)
freeToShare: true
component
summary: Inclusion Criteria: [[1]] Adults. [[2]] Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. [[3]] Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40.0 kg/m2 (BMI ≥ 37.5 kg/m2 in Asian Americans), or BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2 and ≤ 39.9 kg/m2 (BMI 32.5-37.4 kg/m2 in Asian Americans) who do not achieve durable weight loss and improvement in comorbidities (including hyperglycemia) with nonsurgical methods. [[4]] Screened surgical candidates.
type: Population (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1015; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#population)
relatedArtifact
freeToShare: true
component
type: Action (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1016; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#action)
freeToShare: true
component
type: Opposite Action (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1017; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#opposite-action)
freeToShare: true
content
informationType: container
summary: ADA Level of Evidence A. A substantial body of evidence has now been accumulated, including data from numerous randomized controlled (nonblinded) clinical trials, demonstrating that metabolic surgery achieves superior glycemic control and reduction of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity compared with various lifestyle/medical interventions.
type: Evidence (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-content1; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#evidence)
RelatedArtifacts
Type Classifier Citation ResourceReference justification Guideline (), Citation Resource () Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al.; Delegates of the 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: a joint statement by international diabetes organizations. Diabetes Care 2016;39:861–877 Citation/33089: JournalArticleCitation: Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Statement by International Diabetes Organizations justification Evidence Resource () derived from Figure 2C of: Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al.; Delegates of the 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: a joint statement by international diabetes organizations. Diabetes Care 2016;39:861–877 Evidence/33244: ComparativeEvidence: Mean difference in HbA1c effect of bariatric surgery in 2016 meta-analysis "MeanDiffA1c2016metaAnalysis" freeToShare: true
component
summary: ADA Level of Evidence A. A substantial body of evidence has now been accumulated, including data from numerous randomized controlled (nonblinded) clinical trials, demonstrating that metabolic surgery achieves superior glycemic control and reduction of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity compared with various lifestyle/medical interventions.
type: Summary of Findings (Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#summary-of-findings)
freeToShare: true
component
type: Desirable Effects (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1004; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#desirable-effects)
freeToShare: true
component
type: Undesirable Effects (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1005; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#undesirable-effects)
freeToShare: true
component
summary: A substantial body of evidence has now been accumulated, including data from numerous randomized controlled (nonblinded) clinical trials, demonstrating that metabolic surgery achieves superior glycemic control and reduction of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity compared with various lifestyle/medical interventions.<br/>In extended follow-up of obese adults with type 2 diabetes randomized to adding gastric bypass compared with lifestyle and intensive medical management alone, there remained a significantly better composite triple end point in the surgical group at 5 years. However, because the effect size diminished over 5 years, further follow-up is needed to understand the durability of the improvement.
type: Discussion (Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#discussion)
relatedArtifact
relatedArtifact
relatedArtifact
freeToShare: true
content
informationType: container
type: Net Effect (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1007; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#net-effect)
freeToShare: true
Components
Type FreeToShare Values/Preferences (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1006; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#preferences "Preferences") true Discussion (Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#discussion) true
content
informationType: container
type: Judgments (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-content2; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#judgments)
freeToShare: true
Components
content
informationType: container
type: Considerations (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-content3; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#considerations)
freeToShare: true
Components
Summary Type FreeToShare Subgroup Considerations (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1019; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#subgroup-considerations) true Implementation Considerations (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1020; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#implementation-considerations) true Monitoring Considerations (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1021; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#monitoring-considerations) true All members of the PPC are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest with industry and other relevant organizations. These disclosures are discussed at the outset of each Standards of Care revision meeting. Members of the committee, their employers, and their disclosed conflicts of interest are listed in 'Disclosures: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021' (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SPPC). The ADA funds development of the Standards of Care out of its general revenues and does not use industry support for this purpose. NOTE: The disclosed conflicts of interest was not found at the suggested URL Competing Interests (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1002; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#competing-interests) true Research Priorities (Recommendation Justification Code System#RJCS-1022; Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Implementation Guide Code System#research-considerations "Research Considerations") true