Data Exchange For Quality Measures Implementation Guide
5.0.0-ballot - STU5 Ballot
Data Exchange For Quality Measures Implementation Guide
5.0.0-ballot - STU5 Ballot
This page is part of the Da Vinci Data Exchange for Quality Measures (DEQM) FHIR IG (v5.0.0-ballot: STU5 (v5.0.0) Ballot 1) based on FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) R4. The current version which supersedes this version is 4.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
An individual patient level report contains quality data for one patient for one or more Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs). The data of interest is the source data (raw applicable patient data) needed to calculate a CQM. The data elements in the report are defined by the particular CQM being reported on. When pooled and analyzed, each report contributes the quality data necessary to calculate population measure metrics.
The Individual reporting scenario is supported by the DEQM Individual MeasureReport Profile. Transactions between Reporters (for example, an organizations that deliver care to patients, such as a practice or hospital) and Receivers (organizations that want to evaluate CQMs, such as quality reporting programs) are triggered by specific administrative events such as the submission of individual patient level quality reports for CQMs to various quality reporting programs.
The supplementalData extension allows supplementalData to be included in the MeasureReport. For supplementalData that is a calculation, this will be a reference to an Observation containing the result of the supplementalData calculation. For supplementalData that is a resource, this will be a reference to the supplementalData resource. For supplementalData that is calculated only for the measure being reported the resource may be in a contained resource.
The Quality Reporting Page in the R4 Release of the FHIR Specification provides an overview of CQM structures, how CQMs are represented using the Measure resource, and how CQMs are reported using the MeasureReport resource. The Reporting Individual Data section describes how to use a MeasureReport resource to represent the results of an individual calculation, as well as how to use the $evaluate-measure operation to generate an individual MeasureReport from a Measure.
As described in the Quality Measurement Standards Landscape section of this implementation guide, the QI Core IG defines a set of FHIR profiles with extensions and bindings needed to create interoperable, quality-focused applications. For implementers that are familiar with the previous generation of standards that supports individual reporting—Quality Data Model (QDM), Clinical Quality Language (CQL), and the Quality Reporting Document Architecture Category I (QRDA Category I), QI Core profiles are equivalent to the Quality Data Model (QDM) that is used in the QDM-CQL-QRDA paradigm. The collection of resources consisting of the DEQM Individual MeasureReport Profile and the relevant QI Core and DEQM profiles representing the detailed patient data to support calculations of those CQMs is similar to the QRDA Category I in the QDM-CQL-QRDA paradigm.
Some quality programs may require that individual measure report be submitted for only those CQMs for which the corresponding Initial Population (IPOP) criteria have been met. Other quality programs may require individual reports be sent to reference a pre-negotiated set of measures. An individual measure report should be created for each patient meeting the Initial Population criteria of a CQM. No individual measure report should be created for patients that fail to meet any of the initial population criteria.
Often times, a quality program implementing DEQM Individual MeasureReport will provide prescriptive guidelines that define the exact rules for which CQMs to reference individual MeasureReport instance or the exact triggers for sending an individual MeasureReport. Where such prescriptive guidelines exist, they take precedence over the more general guidance provided here.
In general, reporting assumes that Reporters know what measures they select in order to meet their reporting requirements. As in QRDA, the term "smoking gun" is a philosophy where, at a minimum, the conclusive evidence needed to confirm that a criterion was met shall be included in the instance. A quality program supporting the individual reporting scenario will often provide prescriptive guidelines that define additional data, outside the smoking gun, that may or must be sent (such as the complete problem or medication list). Where such prescriptive guidelines exist, those take precedence over the more general guidance provided here.
The recipient of the report may not have access to additional EHR data about an individual subject. Therefore, it is important that the report includes all the data relevant to computing CQM criteria, as well as the other data defined in a CQM (for example, data for stratification, risk adjustment, etc). Data for every data element present in the EHR that is required by the referenced CQM shall be included in the resulting MeasureReport bundle. Additional non-clinical data needed for reporting such as organization, location, or submitter is also reported.
At the very least, an individual measure report should include:
For each data element in each referenced CQM, smoking gun data that offer confirmatory proof, where a patient has met the criterion. For disjunctive criteria (i.e., where a criterion can be satisfied by one of multiple data elements) include minimal smoking gun data for at least one data element.
Stratification variables, supplemental data elements, risk adjustment variables, and any other data element specified in the referenced CQM(s)
The conclusive evidence needed to confirm that a criterion was met for that CQM. For instance, a record for a patient who has been in the Intensive Care Unit undergoing continuous blood pressure monitoring may have much more blood pressure observations than are needed to compute the criteria.
Not all data elements defined within the referenced CQM will always be present in the EHR for each patient for which an individual measure report is to be sent. Therefore, an individual measure report will not contain data for these data elements. For example, if a CQM has a criterion for "blue eyed patients" and the source system does not capture eye color, then the corresponding report for that patient will missing that observation.
Whereas individual measure reporting scenario defines this consistent approach to missing data, specifications of CQMs define the logical processing of missing data (e.g., how to classify a patient into various populations in the absence of an eye color observation). In other words, the CQM addresses how it factors in missing data when calculating criteria, and it is the job of the individual measure report to include relevant data that was present in the EHR, and to not include data that was missing from the EHR.
The $care-gaps report indicates instances in which information does not support the occurrence of an expected action. The report indicates absence of evidence; it cannot differentiate between activity that happened yet is missing from the record or from activities that did not occur. However, both of these situations result in the $care-gaps and the provider is notified in that report. Missing data may be identified in a GuidanceResponse resource as shown in the DEQM Gaps In Care DetectedIssue Profile.
The following resources are used in all individual reporting transactions.
| Resource Type | Profile Name | Link to Profile |
|---|---|---|
| Measure | CRMI Shareable Measure Profile | CRMI Shareable Measure |
| Individual MeasureReport | DEQM Individual MeasureReport Profile | DEQM Individual MeasureReport Profile |
| Organization | QI Core Organization Profile | QI Core Organization |
| Patient | QI Core Patient Profile | QI Core Patient |
Depending on the specific Measure and Interaction, various DEQM and QI Core Profiles are used in addition to the profiles listed above.
When the results of a CQM are completed they are POSTed to the quality measure Receiver's FHIR Server. The Individual MeasureReport(s) and all the referenced resources are bundled together as a set of POST interactions and sent as a single transaction interaction using the Standard FHIR API.
Posting Individual Measure Reports is typically a one time event, although there may be a need to amend or update a report or to report periodically based on the reporting program. The FHIR transaction bundle used in the reporting scenarios SHALL contain only the new and updated DEQM and QI Core Profiles since the last transaction or those that need to be deleted. (Bundle.request.method = POST, PUT, or DELETE).
Note that Multiple individual reports either for the same or multiple patient for the same or multiple CQMs can be sent in a single FHIR Bundle. Since each referenced resource is represented only once in the Bundle even though it may be referenced multiple time within the Bundle, the reporting overhead for the Reporter may be reduced when compared to reporting each individual report separately. (See the FHIR specification for more information about using Bundles and resolving references in Bundles)
POST|[base]
Standard error responses to the Individual Reporting FHIR RESTful transactions including appropriate http response codes are documented in the FHIR specification for RESTful API.
Scenario:
Reporter X submits a MRP Individual Report for Patient P to Receiver Z. The body of the request is a transaction bundle including the Individual MeasureReport and Task resources all the related resources containing the relevant data used to compute the CQM criteria. For a successful transaction, the server returns a Bundle with type set to transaction-response that contains one entry for each entry in the request, in the same order, with the outcome of processing the entry.
POST Individual Report
POST [base]
Request body
{
"id": "bundle-indv-report01",
"resourceType": "Bundle"
"type": "transaction",
"entry": [
{
"fullUrl": "urn:uuid:a548689e-45e7-11e9-9b0c-5cf3707b2e61",
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"url": "MeasureReport"
},
"resource": {
...
"resourceType": "MeasureReport",
"evaluatedResource": [
{
"reference": "Coverage/###ID"
},
{
"reference": "Encounter/###ID"
},
{
"reference": "Location/###ID"
},
{
"reference": "Organization/###ID"
},
{
"reference": "Patient/###ID"
},
{
"reference": "Practitioner/###ID"
},
{
"reference": "Task/###ID"
}
]
}
},
{
"fullUrl": "urn:uuid:a5481b62-45e7-11e9-b20c-5cf3707b2e61",
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"url": "Coverage"
},
"resource": {
...
"resourceType": "Coverage"
}
},
{
"fullUrl": "urn:uuid:a548418c-45e7-11e9-b2e8-5cf3707b2e61",
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"url": "Encounter"
},
"resource": {
...
"resourceType": "Encounter"
}
},
{
"fullUrl": "urn:uuid:a548418d-45e7-11e9-a7b9-5cf3707b2e61",
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"url": "Location"
},
"resource": {
...
"resourceType": "Location"
}
},
{
"fullUrl": "urn:uuid:a548689f-45e7-11e9-8e8f-5cf3707b2e61",
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"url": "Organization"
},
"resource": {
...
"resourceType": "Organization"
}
},
{
"fullUrl": "urn:uuid:a54890a2-45e7-11e9-bdf7-5cf3707b2e61",
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"url": "Organization"
},
"resource": {
...
"resourceType": "Organization"
}
},
{
"fullUrl": "urn:uuid:a54890a3-45e7-11e9-8814-5cf3707b2e61",
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"url": "Patient"
},
"resource": {
...
"resourceType": "Patient"
}
},
{
"fullUrl": "urn:uuid:a548b76e-45e7-11e9-aed5-5cf3707b2e61",
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"url": "Practitioner"
},
"resource": {
...
"resourceType": "Practitioner"
}
},
{
"fullUrl": "urn:uuid:a548de80-45e7-11e9-83b6-5cf3707b2e61",
"request": {
"method": "POST",
"url": "Task"
},
"resource": {
...
"resourceType": "Task"
}
}
]
}
Response
HTTP/1.1 200
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 01:02:06 GMT
Content-Type: application/fhir+json;charset=UTF-8
...Other Headers...
{
"resourceType": "Bundle",
"type": "transaction-response",
"entry": [
{
"response": {
"status": "201 Created",
"location": "MeasureReport/datax-measurereport01/_history/1",
...
}
},
{
"response": {
"status": "201 Created",
"location": "Task/task01/_history/1",
...
}
},
{
"response": {
"status": "200 OK",
"location": "Patient/patient01/_history/4",
...
}
},
{
"response": {
"status": "200 OK",
"location": "Location/location01/_history/2",
...
}
},
{
"response": {
"status": "200 OK",
"location": "Practitioner/practitioner01/_history/4",
...
}
},
{
"response": {
"status": "200 OK",
"location": "Organization/organization01/_history/4",
...
}
},
{
"response": {
"status": "201 Created",
"location": "Encounter/8592c13d-821a-bfef-74db-ae614e754d4f/_history/1",
...
}
},
{
"response": {
"status": "200 OK",
"location": "Coverage/coverage01/_history/2",
...
}
},
{
"response": {
"status": "200 OK",
"location": "Organization/organization04/_history/4",
...
}
}
]
}
For a complete un-edited examples for both single and multiple patients see the MRP Individual MeasureReport, COL Individual MeasureReport, and VTE Individual MeasureReport and Bundle Multiple Indv Report examples. for an example of a Individual MeasureReport with counts for stratifiers specified in an eCQM see the Indv Measurreport Stratification Example.
IG © 2020+ HL7 International / Clinical Quality Information. Package hl7.fhir.us.davinci-deqm#5.0.0-ballot based on FHIR 4.0.1. Generated 2024-08-27
Links: Table of Contents |
QA Report
| Version History |
|
Propose a change