Artifactassessment-example-certainty-rating

Release 5

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v5.0.0: R5 - STU). This is the current published version in it's permanent home (it will always be available at this URL). For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions

Example ArtifactAssessment/example-certainty-rating (Narrative)

Clinical Decision Support Work Group

Maturity Level: N/A

Standards Status: Informative

Compartments: No defined compartments

This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML, JSON or Turtle format. This example conforms to the profile ArtifactAssessment.

Generated Narrative: ArtifactAssessment

Resource ArtifactAssessment "example-certainty-rating"

identifier: FEvIR Object Identifier: 27756

date: 2021-11-02T14:48:59.89Z

copyright: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

artifact: Evidence/18812: Critically appraised summary of all-cause mortality in meta-analysis of RCTs of heparin for moderately ill patients with COVID-19

content
informationType: rating
summary: serious concerns with risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision
type: Overall certainty (Evidence Certainty Type#Overall)
classifier: Very low quality (Evidence Certainty Rating#very-low)
author: : Brian S. Alper
freeToShare: true
Components
- InformationType Summary Type Classifier Author
* rating risk of bias in both included trials Risk of bias (Evidence Certainty Type#RiskOfBias) serious concern (Evidence Certainty Rating#serious-concern) : Brian S. Alper
* rating high degree of heterogeneity (I-squared 80.7%) with confidence intervals of 2 trial effect estimates barely overlapping Inconsistency (Evidence Certainty Type#Inconsistency) serious concern (Evidence Certainty Rating#serious-concern) : Brian S. Alper
* rating Indirectness (Evidence Certainty Type#Indirectness) no serious concern (Evidence Certainty Rating#no-concern) : Brian S. Alper
* rating 95% confidence interval includes both large effects and no effects Imprecision (Evidence Certainty Type#Imprecision) serious concern (Evidence Certainty Rating#serious-concern) : Brian S. Alper
* rating Publication bias (Evidence Certainty Type#PublicationBias) no serious concern (Evidence Certainty Rating#no-concern) : Brian S. Alper

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.