This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v0.06: DSTU 1 Ballot 2). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) defines a set of resources for use in exchanging information about the healthcare process. Resources are:
In addition to the basic resources, FHIR defines a lightweight implementation framework that supports the use of these resources in RESTful environments, classic message exchanges, human-centric clinical documents and enterprise SOA architectures. Each of these approaches provides its own benefits - FHIR provides the underpinning enablement that makes the choosing one of these painless and enables enterprises to choose their own paradigm without forsaking interoperability with other paradigms.
Though the resources are simple and easy to understand, they are backed by a thorough, global requirements gathering and formal modeling process that ensures that the content of the resources is stable and reliable. The resource contents are mapped to solid underlying ontologies and models using computable languages (including RDF) so that the definitions and contents of the resources can be leveraged by computational analysis and conversion processes.
FHIR also provides an underlying conformance framework and tooling that allows different implementation contexts and enterprises to describe their context and use of resources in formal computable ways and to empower computed interoperability that leverages both the conformance and definitional frameworks.
The combination of the resources and the 3 supporting layers (implementation frameworks, definitional thoroughness, and conformance tooling) frees healthcare data so that it can easily flow to where it needs to be (hospital production systems, mobile clinical systems, cloud based data stores, national health repositories, research databases, etc.) without having to pass through format and semantic inter-conversion hurdles along the way.
Compared to the all the other approaches, FHIR... [-- Obligatory: insert your FHIR FIRE related joke here --].
This specification is structured into 3 parts: the introduction, the implementation section and the resource definitions.
The introduction provides foundational material that is required to understand and use resources:
The implementation section explains how resources are used in various contexts:
The resources section enumerates the resources:
For each resource, the following pages are provided:
The FHIR community meets inside the wider HL7 community and draws on its extensive human resources, institutional memory, previous standards and corporate support. HL7 itself owns FHIR and makes it freely available and the community relies on HL7 provided infrastructure.
The primary resources used by the FHIR community are the HL7 wiki, and the FHIR email list. In addition, the community holds regular face to face meetings as part of the HL7 Working Group meetings. The formal governance arrangements that manage FHIR development are documented (where? - todo)
Note that each page contains a direct link to its matching wiki page where input from the wider community is managed. Community input is very welcome - please consider making comments.
The EHR System Functional Model provides a reference list of functions that may be present in an Electronic Health Record System. While FHIR is an implementation focused on exchange of information in healthcare, this often happens in the context of an EHR. This table briefly describes one way that FHIR can be used to meet the requirements described in the EHR-FM and is provided to help readers of the FHIR specification understand how FHIR can be used. There are many other equally valid ways to implement the EHR-FM and to make use of FHIR.
EHR Function | FHIR Implementation Notes | |
---|---|---|
IN.1 | Security | FHIR defines parts of the security infrastructure, and delegates others to standard web based security frameworks |
IN.1.1 | Entity Authentication | FHIR assumes that the users are authenticated. OAuth is the preferred mechanism |
IN.1.2 | Entity Authorization | FHIR doesn't currently provide any resources to describe or manage access-control permissions. By default, underlying web frameworks such as SAML would be used. See the security section for a discussion of binding between FHIR and SAML |
IN.1.3 | Entity Access Control | See above about SAML / OAuth |
IN.1.4 | Patient Access Management | FHIR does not - yet? - include functionality related to this requirement |
IN.1.5 | Non-Repudiation | The provenance resource tracks the timestamps, actors, digital signatures associated with resources |
IN.1.6 | Secure Data Exchange | TLS (https:) should be used for all production exchange of data. All conformant FHIR RESTful implementations must be able to use https |
IN.1.7 | Secure Data Routing | FHIR allows for brokers and various forms of messaging that support assured destinations and delivery (also see IN.2.2 below) |
IN.1.8 | Information Attestation | See the provenance resource |
IN.1.9 | Patient Privacy and Confidentiality | FHIR does not - yet? - include functionality related to this requirement, though implementations would be expected to provide this |
IN.2 | Health Record Information and Management | This is the core focus of the FHIR specification |
IN.2.1 | Data Retention, Availability and Destruction | A FHIR RESTful server gives precise and fine-grained control of retention, availability and destruction of resources, all clearly described by the conformance statement |
IN.2.2 | Auditable Records | FHIR provides the SecurityEvent resource for auditable records. |
IN.2.3 | Synchronization | FHIR supports synchronization using standard web publication/subscription methods via Atom feeds. Atom-based pub/sub may be push or pull based, and can include all resources of a particular type, or selected subsets of the resources. In addition, groups of resources can be exchanged in bundles, keeping a set of related resources in synchronization |
IN.2.4 | Extraction of Health Record Information | FHIR does not provide report formats (yet?), but does provide extensive search and retrieval functions to assist with building such reports |
IN.2.5 | Store and Manage Health Record Information | A FHIR RESTful server can store and manage health information persistently - see below for further information. |
IN.2.5.1/2 | Manage Structured and Unstructured Health Record Information | The dual contents of FHIR resources - structured data and XHTML narrative - provide seamless support for dealing with a mix of structured and unstructured information |
IN.3 | Registry and Directory Services | The FHIR Administration resources provide a naturally registry based access to patients, providers, etc |
IN.4 | Standard Terminologies and Terminology Services | FHIR encourages the use of standard terminologies whereever possible, and provides full support for their use through a variety of terminology related data types. FHIR does not define a terminology infrasturcture or service, but does define the Profile and ValueSet resources to describe how terminology is used in a FHIR context |
IN.5 | Standards-based Interoperability | FHIR is a definition of a standard on which to base interoperability |
IN.5.1 | Interchange Standards | This is the core focus of FHIR. See below for discussion of interaction modes |
IN.5.2 | Interchange Standards Versioning and Maintenance | FHIR version maintenance is described here |
IN.5.3 | Standards-based Application Integration | FHIR enables simple integration through use of an easy to understand, use and debug web based infrastructure. The same framework used within an EHR for persistence can also offer a simple way to implement exchange |
IN.5.4 | Interchange Agreements | The FHIR Conformance Statement and Resource Profile resources provide a registry based infrastructure for individual trading partner agreements, as well as for community based ones |
IN.6 | Business Rules Management | FHIR does not address this requirement at this time |
IN.7 | Workflow Management | FHIR does not address this requirement at this time, though the resources and services exist to support this functionality |
The EHR functional model describes several modes for interaction between systems. Each of these can be implemented in several different ways using FHIR
Interaction Modes | FHIR Options |
---|---|
Unsolicited Notifications e.g. a patient has arrived for a clinic appointment |
|
Query/Response e.g., Is Adam Everyman known to the system? Yes, MRN is 12345678. |
|
Service Request and Response e.g., Laboratory Order for Fasting Blood Sugar and a response containing the results of the test. | Could be supported either through Messaging or SOA solutions. Request/Response support is not yet defined |
Information Interchange between organizations (e.g. in a RHIO, or in a National Health System) |
|
Structured / Unstructured clinical document, e.g., dictated surgical note | See the Documents |
The combination of a properly secured and managed FHIR server, along with enforced use of the SecurityEvent and Provenance resources ensures that the core record management functions defined in the EHR-FM are met:
Additional functionality not defined (yet?) in FHIR is required to ensure non-repudation, access control, and consent tracking.
This is an old version of FHIR retained for archive purposes. Do not use for anything else
Implementers are welcome to experiment with the content defined here, but should note that the contents are subject to change without prior notice.
© HL7.org 2011 - 2012. FHIR v0.06 generated on Tue, Dec 4, 2012 00:04+1100. License