This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v0.0.82: DSTU 1). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3 R2

2.8 Managing Resource Identity

Each resource has a known identity, which is a URL. The identity is not stored inside the resource, but must be tracked by systems handling resources. For RESTful systems, the resource identity is the same as the URL by which it is found. When a resource is packaged in a bundle (e.g. for messages or documents, or exchanged in a service , the id is included along with the resource. When systems using FHIR resources are deployed in an implementation context where there is more than two systems exchanging resources, the way that resources are identified with URLs needs to be managed carefully.

Note that many resources also have an identifier element, which may repeat. This identifier is a logical identifier for the concept that the resource describes, and is different to the identity discussed in this section, which is the literal identity of the resource. Note that there are often multiple resource instances that describe the same concept across multiple systems, e.g. each application keeps it's own copy of the patient information in a Patient resource. This can even exist within a single system, such as in the case of patient duplicates).

2.8.1 Using Resources

Resources are used in a variety of circumstances. Generally, these can be categorized into 3 different scenarios:

1. Closed Trading System: the resources are only ever exchanged between fixed systems in a tightly controlled community, such as a single EHR system with multiple modules. There is only one master server for each resource type, and resources are managed by that server. In this context, the logical id of a resource is sufficient to fully identify the resource
2. Open system: there are many peer servers, each managing a set of resources of different types. In order to identify resources, a full URL reference to the origin server is required. The grand example of an open system is the World Wide Web
3. Partially closed, inter-linked systems: a mixture of both closed and open systems - trading communities that are tightly managed, but have managed interactions with other closed trading systems, or with the world-wide web, or both. In fact, this combination appears to be the most likely scenario for current real-world healthcare business solutions

These combinations are why either relative (logical) or absolute references are allowed, and why a logical id is always required, in order to enable seamless exchange amongst partially closed trading systems.

2.8.2 Copying Resources and Re-identification

When resources are exchanged between systems, they may need to be re-identified (i.e. assigned a new resource). When a resource is re-identified, nothing in the resource changes, but any references that point to the resource need to be updated. Whether re-identification is required or not depends on the context, as does how resource references are updated.

The normal case is that a client/receiving system accepts the server/sender's identification of a resource at face value, whether it is a relative or absolute reference. When the client/receiver wants to follow resource references, they are done using the server id (typically either by http calls or locating them in a bundle), but other arrangements are possible. In such cases, there is no need for re-identification.

Another scenario is for a client to retrieve a resource from a server, and make its own local persistent copy. If the local resource has a life-cycle of its own (i.e. it is not just a cached resource), then it needs to have its own identity; i.e. the resource must be re-identified. The simplest case is that the client only is keeping local copies of resources from a single server. In these cases, the client can simply replace the root URL and keep the logical id of the resource the same. In fact, if the server is using relative references, then this change doesn't involve any actual changes to the resources, it only means a re-interpretation of the references.

In some cases, however, the client may deal with multiple servers. In this case, the logical id of the resource is not guaranteed to be unique (unless all resources have a UUID for the logical id, which is allowed but not required). When the client cannot be sure that the resource identities are unique, it will have to re-identify the resources. In practice this means that the client needs to keep some kind of identity translation table, and update references to the resources it has copied locally when other resources are received.

The case of a gateway system that migrates resources from one ecosystem to another is very similar. In some limited cases, it can leave the logical id of the resources unchanged as resources are copied from one closed system to another. However in more complicated cases, it will have to modify the resource references as resources pass across the gateway.

DSTU Note: In it's current form, FHIR allows various convenient implementer practices around resource identification that make integration across eco-system boundaries more difficult. In particular, either only allowing UUIDs for logical IDs or only allowing absolute references would make the boundary management problem easier but remove useful and convenient flexibility for other uses of FHIR. Feedback on this will be welcome during trial use.