R4 Ballot #1 (Mixed Normative/Trial use)

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v3.3.0: R4 Ballot 2). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4

4.3.1.927 Value Set http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/provenance-history-agent-type

Security Work Group Maturity Level: 0Informative Use Context: Not Intended for Production use

This is a value set defined by the FHIR project.

Summary

Defining URL:http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/provenance-history-agent-type
Name:Provenance Event History Agent Role Codes
Definition:

Types of roles indicating how a particular agent was involved with the creation or modification of a resource for use when exposing event history

Committee:Security Work Group
OID:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.3.927 (for OID based terminology systems)
Source ResourceXML / JSON

This value set is used in the following places:

4.3.1.927.1 Content Logical Definition

This value set includes codes from the following code systems:

  • Include these codes as defined in http://hl7.org/fhir/v3/ParticipationType
    CodeDisplay
    AUTAuthorDefinition: A party that originates the Act and therefore has responsibility for the information given in the Act and ownership of this Act.
    Example: the report writer, the person writing the act definition, the guideline author, the placer of an order, the EKG cart (device) creating a report etc. Every Act should have an author. Authorship is regardless of mood always actual authorship.
    Examples of such policies might include:
    The author and anyone they explicitly delegate may update the report;
    All administrators within the same clinic may cancel and reschedule appointments created by other administrators within that clinic;
    A party that is neither an author nor a party who is extended authorship maintenance rights by policy, may only amend, reverse, override, replace, or follow up in other ways on this Act, whereby the Act remains intact and is linked to another Act authored by that other party.
    INFInformantA source of reported information (e.g., a next of kin who answers questions about the patient's history). For history questions, the patient is logically an informant, yet the informant of history questions is implicitly the subject.
    VRFVerifierA person who verifies the correctness and appropriateness of the service (plan, order, event, etc.) and hence takes on accountability.
    ENTData EntererA person entering the data into the originating system. The data entry person is collected optionally for internal quality control purposes. This includes the transcriptionist for dictated text.

 

See the full registry of value sets defined as part of FHIR.

Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:

LvlA few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. For value sets, levels are mostly used to organize codes for user convenience, but may follow code system hierarchy - see Code System for further information
SourceThe source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere)
CodeThe code (used as the code in the resource instance). If the code is in italics, this indicates that the code is not selectable ('Abstract')
DisplayThe display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application
DefinitionAn explanation of the meaning of the concept
CommentsAdditional notes about how to use the code