HL7 FHIR® Implementation Guide: Electronic Case Reporting (eCR) - US Realm
2.1.0 - STU 2 US

This page is part of the electronic Case Reporting (eCR) (v2.1.0: STU 2) based on FHIR R4. This is the current published version in its permanent home (it will always be available at this URL). For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions

The Specification

This section defines the specific requirements for systems wishing to conform to this IG.

Context

Pre-reading

Before reading this implementation guide, implementers should first be familiar with two other key portions of the specification:

  • The pages listed under the Transaction Profiles tab provide the context and general process flow enabled by the formal specification.

  • The pages listed under the Implementation Guidance tab provide design considerations, narrative guidance, and query and rule filter generation information.

Conventions

This implementation guide uses specific terminology to flag statements that have relevance for the evaluation of conformance with the guide:

  • SHALL indicates requirements that must be met to be conformant with the specification.

  • SHOULD indicates behaviors that are strongly recommended (and which may result in interoperability issues or sub-optimal behavior if not adhered to), but which do not, for this version of the specification, affect the determination of specification conformance.

  • MAY describes optional behaviors that are free to consider but where the is no recommendation for or against adoption.

Claiming Conformance

Actors and Systems asserting conformance to this implementation guide have to implement the requirements outlined in the corresponding capability statements. The following definition of MUST SUPPORT is to be used in the implementation of the requirements.

MUST SUPPORT Definition
  • Systems SHALL be capable of populating data elements as specified by the profiles.
  • Systems SHALL be capable of processing resource instances containing the MUST SUPPORT data elements without generating an error or causing the application to fail. In other words, Systems SHOULD be capable of displaying the data elements for human use or storing it for other purposes.
  • In situations where information on a particular data element is not present and the reason for absence is unknown, Systems SHALL NOT include the data elements in the resource instance.
  • When accessing eICR data, Systems SHALL interpret missing data elements within resource instances as data not present.

Profiles

This specification makes significant use of FHIR profiles and terminology artifacts to describe the content to be shared as part of eICR workflows. The implementation guide is based on FHIR R4.

The full set of profiles defined in this implementation guide can be found by following the links on the FHIR Artifacts page.

US Core

This IG also leverages the US Core set of profiles defined by HL7 for sharing non-veterinary EMR individual health data in the U.S. Where US Core profiles exist, this IG either leverages them directly or uses them as a base for any additional constraints needed to support the member attribution list use cases. If no constraints are needed, this IG does not define any profiles.

Where US Core profiles do not yet exist (e.g., for PlanDefinition, Bundle), MedMorph profiles have been created.

SMART on FHIR Backend Services Authorization

This section outlines how the SMART on FHIR Backend Services Authorization will be used by the MedMorph Reference Architecture implementation guide.

  • The following actors comprise the System Actors: EHRs, Knowledge Artifact Repository, Backend Service App, Trust Service Provider, Trusted Third Party, PHA, and Research Organizations.

  • System Actors (EHRs, Knowledge Artifact Repository, Backend Service App, Trust Service Provider, Trusted Third Party, PHA, and Research Organization) SHALL advertise conformance to SMART Backend Services by hosting a Well-Known Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) as defined in the Bulk Data Access IG specification.

  • System Actors SHALL include token_endpoint, scopes_supported, token_endpoint_auth_methods_supported and token_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported as defined in the Bulk Data Access IG specification.

  • When System Actors act as clients, they SHALL share their JSON Web Key Set (JWKS) with the server System Actors using Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) as defined in the Bulk Data Access IG specification.

  • Client System Actors SHALL obtain the access token as defined in the Bulk Data Access IG specification.

  • Content Implementation Guides SHALL each specify the scope of each respective use case.