This page is part of the Consumer Real-time Pharmacy Benefit Check (v1.0.0: STU 1) based on FHIR R4. This is the current published version in it's permanent home (it will always be available at this URL). For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
This implementation guide enables clients to identify the patient’s medication using ‘representative NDC 11’ identifiers. A representative NDC 11 has two important characteristics:
Details on determining an appropriate representative NDC 11 are available in the SCRIPT Implementation Recommendations document, located on the public ePrescribing site of the National Council for Prescription Drug Programs (NCPDP).
The information contained in the RTPBC response must reflect patient cost and coverage as of the date and time the request is received. The implementation guide expects that all responses are calculated using the patient’s current insurance coverage and current cost information; it doesn’t enable requests for information related to future or past events.
The Patient Pay Type value set specifies different patient costs that may be returned in an RTPBC response. Included are:
The responder is encouraged to return all relevant alternatives to the submitted medication and pharmacy. An alternative is any drug + pharmacy combination that differs from what was specified in the request:
Pharmacy alternatives can be particularly valuable to the patient as they decide where to have their prescription dispensed. Consider the patient’s location when determining pharmacy options, along with pharmacy-related differences in the patient’s out-of-pocket costs.
Note regarding medication alternatives: Alternatives returned in the response may or may not be appropriate for the given patient, and other alternatives may be available that are not returned in the RTPBC response.
When a party that has implemented the responder role of this implementation guide and can also respond to the provider-focused NCPDP Real-time Prescription Benefit (RTPB) transaction, it SHALL ensure that it returns consistent values for information that is common between the two standards.
While the consumer and provider exchanges each contain unique content for its audience, it is very important that information that is common to both is reported consistently – to support discussion between the patient and provider and to avoid confusion.
For example, the total out of pocket cost returned for a given patient medication must be the same whether reported by the consumer or provider messaging. And the the Benefit Restriction information returned in the response described in this guide must accurately summarize benefit restrictions details returned in the NCPDP provider-focused RTPB transaction.
This guide was designed to be compatible with the NCPDP RTPB transaction and uses the same processing assumptions and information definitions wherever possible.
The real-time benefit check process is a point-in-time exchange that does not result in persisted information for later client retrieval.