Release 5

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v5.0.0: R5 - STU). This is the current published version in it's permanent home (it will always be available at this URL). For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions

Example ConceptMap/sc-artifactassessment-workflow-status (JSON)

Clinical Decision Support Work GroupMaturity Level: N/AStandards Status: Informative

Raw JSON (canonical form + also see JSON Format Specification)

Canonical Mapping for "Artifact Assessment Workflow Status"

{
  "resourceType" : "ConceptMap",
  "id" : "sc-artifactassessment-workflow-status",
  "text" : {
    "status" : "extensions",
    "div" : "<div xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><h2>ArtifactAssessmentWorkflowStatusCanonicalMap (http://hl7.org/fhir/ConceptMap/sc-artifactassessment-workflow-status)</h2><p>Mapping from <a href=\"valueset-artifactassessment-workflow-status.html\">Artifact Assessment Workflow Status</a> to <a href=\"valueset-resource-status.html\">Canonical Status Codes for FHIR Resources</a></p><p>DRAFT. Published on 2020-12-28T16:55:11+11:00 by HL7 (FHIR Project) (<a href=\"http://hl7.org/fhir\">http://hl7.org/fhir</a>, <a href=\"mailto:fhir@lists.hl7.org\">fhir@lists.hl7.org</a>). </p><div><p>Canonical Mapping for &quot;Possible values for the workflow status of the comment or assessment, typically used to coordinate workflow around the process of accepting and rejecting changes and comments on the artifact.&quot;</p>\n</div><br/><p><b>Group 1</b>Mapping from <a href=\"codesystem-artifactassessment-workflow-status.html\">Artifact Assessment Workflow Status</a> to <a href=\"codesystem-resource-status.html\">Canonical Status Codes for FHIR Resources</a></p><table class=\"grid\"><tr><td><b>Source Code</b></td><td><b>Relationship</b></td><td><b>Target Code</b></td></tr><tr><td>entered-in-error</td><td><a href=\"codesystem-concept-map-relationship.html#equivalent\" title=\"equivalent\">is equivalent to</a></td><td>error</td></tr><tr><td>submitted</td><td><a href=\"codesystem-concept-map-relationship.html#equivalent\" title=\"equivalent\">is equivalent to</a></td><td>proposed</td></tr><tr><td>triaged</td><td><a href=\"codesystem-concept-map-relationship.html#equivalent\" title=\"equivalent\">is equivalent to</a></td><td>planned</td></tr><tr><td>resolved-no-change</td><td><a href=\"codesystem-concept-map-relationship.html#equivalent\" title=\"equivalent\">is equivalent to</a></td><td>declined</td></tr><tr><td>resolved-change-required</td><td><a href=\"codesystem-concept-map-relationship.html#equivalent\" title=\"equivalent\">is equivalent to</a></td><td>accepted</td></tr><tr><td>applied</td><td><a href=\"codesystem-concept-map-relationship.html#equivalent\" title=\"equivalent\">is equivalent to</a></td><td>active</td></tr><tr><td>waiting-for-input</td><td><a href=\"codesystem-concept-map-relationship.html#equivalent\" title=\"equivalent\">is equivalent to</a></td><td>suspended</td></tr><tr><td>deferred</td><td><a href=\"codesystem-concept-map-relationship.html#equivalent\" title=\"equivalent\">is equivalent to</a></td><td>suspended</td></tr><tr><td>published</td><td><a href=\"codesystem-concept-map-relationship.html#equivalent\" title=\"equivalent\">is equivalent to</a></td><td>complete</td></tr><tr><td>duplicate</td><td><a href=\"codesystem-concept-map-relationship.html#equivalent\" title=\"equivalent\">is equivalent to</a></td><td>complete</td></tr></table></div>"
  },
  "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/ConceptMap/sc-artifactassessment-workflow-status",
  "version" : "5.0.0",
  "name" : "ArtifactAssessmentWorkflowStatusCanonicalMap",
  "title" : "Canonical Mapping for \"Artifact Assessment Workflow Status\"",
  "status" : "draft",
  "experimental" : false,
  "date" : "2020-12-28T16:55:11+11:00",
  "publisher" : "HL7 (FHIR Project)",
  "contact" : [{
    "telecom" : [{
      "system" : "url",
      "value" : "http://hl7.org/fhir"
    },
    {
      "system" : "email",
      "value" : "fhir@lists.hl7.org"
    }]
  }],
  "description" : "Canonical Mapping for \"Possible values for the workflow status of the comment or assessment, typically used to coordinate workflow around the process of accepting and rejecting changes and comments on the artifact.\"",
  "jurisdiction" : [{
    "coding" : [{
      "system" : "http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm",
      "code" : "001",
      "display" : "World"
    }]
  }],
  "sourceScopeCanonical" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/artifactassessment-workflow-status",
  "targetScopeCanonical" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/resource-status",
  "group" : [{
    "source" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/artifactassessment-workflow-status",
    "target" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/resource-status",
    "element" : [{
      "code" : "entered-in-error",
      "target" : [{
        "code" : "error",
        "relationship" : "equivalent"
      }]
    },
    {
      "code" : "submitted",
      "target" : [{
        "code" : "proposed",
        "relationship" : "equivalent"
      }]
    },
    {
      "code" : "triaged",
      "target" : [{
        "code" : "planned",
        "relationship" : "equivalent"
      }]
    },
    {
      "code" : "resolved-no-change",
      "target" : [{
        "code" : "declined",
        "relationship" : "equivalent"
      }]
    },
    {
      "code" : "resolved-change-required",
      "target" : [{
        "code" : "accepted",
        "relationship" : "equivalent"
      }]
    },
    {
      "code" : "applied",
      "target" : [{
        "code" : "active",
        "relationship" : "equivalent"
      }]
    },
    {
      "code" : "waiting-for-input",
      "target" : [{
        "code" : "suspended",
        "relationship" : "equivalent"
      }]
    },
    {
      "code" : "deferred",
      "target" : [{
        "code" : "suspended",
        "relationship" : "equivalent"
      }]
    },
    {
      "code" : "published",
      "target" : [{
        "code" : "complete",
        "relationship" : "equivalent"
      }]
    },
    {
      "code" : "duplicate",
      "target" : [{
        "code" : "complete",
        "relationship" : "equivalent"
      }]
    }]
  }]
}

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.