Release 5 Ballot

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v5.0.0-ballot: FHIR R5 Ballot Preview). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions

4.4.1.15 ValueSet http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/adverse-event-participant-function

Patient Care Work Group Maturity Level: 1Draft Use Context: Not Intended for Production use, Not Intended for Production use

This is a value set defined by the FHIR project.

Summary

Defining URL:http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/adverse-event-participant-function
Version:5.0.0-ballot
Name:AdverseEvent Participant Function
Title:AdverseEvent Participant Function
Status:draft
Definition:

This value set includes codes that describe the type of involvement of the actor in the adverse event.

Committee:Patient Care Work Group
OID:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.3.3235 (for OID based terminology systems)
Flags:Experimental

This value set is used in the following places:

4.4.1.15.1 Content Logical Definition

  • Include these codes as defined in http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType
    CodeDisplayDefinition
    INF informantA source of reported information (e.g., a next of kin who answers questions about the patient's history). For history questions, the patient is logically an informant, yet the informant of history questions is implicitly the subject.
    PART ParticipationIndicates that the target of the participation is involved in some manner in the act, but does not qualify how.
    WIT witnessOnly with service events. A person witnessing the action happening without doing anything. A witness is not necessarily aware, much less approves of anything stated in the service event. Example for a witness is students watching an operation or an advanced directive witness.
    AUT author (originator)**Definition:** A party that originates the Act and therefore has responsibility for the information given in the Act and ownership of this Act.

    **Example:** the report writer, the person writing the act definition, the guideline author, the placer of an order, the EKG cart (device) creating a report etc. Every Act should have an author. Authorship is regardless of mood always actual authorship.

    Examples of such policies might include:

    * The author and anyone they explicitly delegate may update the report;
    * All administrators within the same clinic may cancel and reschedule appointments created by other administrators within that clinic;

    A party that is neither an author nor a party who is extended authorship maintenance rights by policy, may only amend, reverse, override, replace, or follow up in other ways on this Act, whereby the Act remains intact and is linked to another Act authored by that other party.

 

See the full registry of value sets defined as part of FHIR.

Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:

LvlA few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. For value sets, levels are mostly used to organize codes for user convenience, but may follow code system hierarchy - see Code System for further information
SourceThe source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere)
CodeThe code (used as the code in the resource instance). If the code is in italics, this indicates that the code is not selectable ('Abstract')
DisplayThe display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application
DefinitionAn explanation of the meaning of the concept
CommentsAdditional notes about how to use the code