R4 Ballot #2 (Mixed Normative/Trial use)

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v3.5.0: R4 Ballot #2). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3 R2

2.45 Resource OperationOutcome - Content

FHIR Infrastructure Work GroupMaturity Level: 5 Normative Compartments: Not linked to any defined compartments

Normative Candidate Note: This page is candidate normative content for R4 in the Infrastructure Package. Once normative, it will lose it's Maturity Level, and breaking changes will no longer be made.

A collection of error, warning or information messages that result from a system action.

Operation outcomes are sets of error, warning and information messages that provide detailed information about the outcome of an attempted system operation. They are provided as a direct system response or component of one and provide information about the outcome of the operation.

The OperationOutcome resource is used in the following circumstances:

  • When an RESTful operation fails
  • As the response on a validation operation to provide information about the outcome
  • As part of a message response, usually when the message has not been processed correctly
  • As the response to a batch/transaction, when requested
  • As part of a search's Bundle response containing information about the search

This resource is referenced by GuidanceResponse and MessageHeader. The reference from GuidanceResponse indicates that there is an additional use context that needs to be addressed in the scope.

This resource is not used for reporting clinical or workflow issues associated with a proposed or ongoing action; these would be handled using DetectedIssue or other resources. The resource is not designed to be persisted or referenced from other parts of the workflow.

It is possible to have both OperationOutcome and DetectedIssue together, where the OperationOutcome might indicate that a requested action was rejected due to a clinical issue and the DetectedIssue provides the details of the issue.

This resource is referenced by GuidanceResponse and MessageHeader

Structure

NameFlagsCard.TypeDescription & Constraintsdoco
.. OperationOutcome ΣNDomainResourceInformation about the success/failure of an action
Elements defined in Ancestors: id, meta, implicitRules, language, text, contained, extension, modifierExtension
... issue Σ1..*BackboneElementA single issue associated with the action
.... severity Σ1..1codefatal | error | warning | information
IssueSeverity (Required)
.... code Σ1..1codeError or warning code
IssueType (Required)
.... details Σ0..1CodeableConceptAdditional details about the error
Operation Outcome Codes (Example)
.... diagnostics Σ0..1stringAdditional diagnostic information about the issue
.... location ΣXD0..*stringDeprecated: Path of element(s) related to issue
.... expression Σ0..*stringFHIRPath of element(s) related to issue

doco Documentation for this format

UML Diagram (Legend)

OperationOutcome (DomainResource)IssueIndicates whether the issue indicates a variation from successful processingseverity : code [1..1] « How the issue affects the success of the action. (Strength=Required)IssueSeverity! »Describes the type of the issue. The system that creates an OperationOutcome SHALL choose the most applicable code from the IssueType value set, and may additional provide its own code for the error in the details elementcode : code [1..1] « A code that describes the type of issue. (Strength=Required)IssueType! »Additional details about the error. This may be a text description of the error, or a system code that identifies the errordetails : CodeableConcept [0..1] « A code that provides details as the exact issue. (Strength=Example)OperationOutcomeCodes?? »Additional diagnostic information about the issue. Typically, this may be a description of how a value is erroneous, or a stack dump to help trace the issuediagnostics : string [0..1]This element is depracated because it is XML specific. It is replaced by issue.expression, which is format independent, and simpler to parse. For resource issues, this will be a simple XPath limited to element names, repetition indicators and the default child access that identifies one of the elements in the resource that caused this issue to be raised. For HTTP errors, will be "http." + the parameter namelocation : string [0..*]A [simple subset of FHIRPath](fhirpath.html#simple) limited to element names, repetition indicators and the default child access that identifies one of the elements in the resource that caused this issue to be raisedexpression : string [0..*]An error, warning or information message that results from a system actionissue[1..*]

XML Template

<OperationOutcome xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> doco
 <!-- from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language -->
 <!-- from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension -->
 <issue>  <!-- 1..* A single issue associated with the action -->
  <severity value="[code]"/><!-- 1..1 fatal | error | warning | information -->
  <code value="[code]"/><!-- 1..1 Error or warning code -->
  <details><!-- 0..1 CodeableConcept Additional details about the error --></details>
  <diagnostics value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Additional diagnostic information about the issue -->
  <location value="[string]"/><!-- 0..* Deprecated: Path of element(s) related to issue -->
  <expression value="[string]"/><!-- 0..* FHIRPath of element(s) related to issue -->
 </issue>
</OperationOutcome>

Turtle Template

@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> .doco


[ a fhir:OperationOutcome;
  fhir:nodeRole fhir:treeRoot; # if this is the parser root

  # from Resource: .id, .meta, .implicitRules, and .language
  # from DomainResource: .text, .contained, .extension, and .modifierExtension
  fhir:OperationOutcome.issue [ # 1..* A single issue associated with the action
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.severity [ code ]; # 1..1 fatal | error | warning | information
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.code [ code ]; # 1..1 Error or warning code
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.details [ CodeableConcept ]; # 0..1 Additional details about the error
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.diagnostics [ string ]; # 0..1 Additional diagnostic information about the issue
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.location [ string ], ... ; # 0..* Deprecated: Path of element(s) related to issue
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.expression [ string ], ... ; # 0..* FHIRPath of element(s) related to issue
  ], ...;
]

Changes since R3

OperationOutcome
OperationOutcome.issue.severity
  • No longer marked as Modifier

See the Full Difference for further information

This analysis is available as XML or JSON.

See R3 <--> R4 Conversion Maps (status = 6 tests that all execute ok. 6 fail round-trip testing and 6 r3 resources are invalid (0 errors).)

Structure

NameFlagsCard.TypeDescription & Constraintsdoco
.. OperationOutcome ΣNDomainResourceInformation about the success/failure of an action
Elements defined in Ancestors: id, meta, implicitRules, language, text, contained, extension, modifierExtension
... issue Σ1..*BackboneElementA single issue associated with the action
.... severity Σ1..1codefatal | error | warning | information
IssueSeverity (Required)
.... code Σ1..1codeError or warning code
IssueType (Required)
.... details Σ0..1CodeableConceptAdditional details about the error
Operation Outcome Codes (Example)
.... diagnostics Σ0..1stringAdditional diagnostic information about the issue
.... location ΣXD0..*stringDeprecated: Path of element(s) related to issue
.... expression Σ0..*stringFHIRPath of element(s) related to issue

doco Documentation for this format

UML Diagram (Legend)

OperationOutcome (DomainResource)IssueIndicates whether the issue indicates a variation from successful processingseverity : code [1..1] « How the issue affects the success of the action. (Strength=Required)IssueSeverity! »Describes the type of the issue. The system that creates an OperationOutcome SHALL choose the most applicable code from the IssueType value set, and may additional provide its own code for the error in the details elementcode : code [1..1] « A code that describes the type of issue. (Strength=Required)IssueType! »Additional details about the error. This may be a text description of the error, or a system code that identifies the errordetails : CodeableConcept [0..1] « A code that provides details as the exact issue. (Strength=Example)OperationOutcomeCodes?? »Additional diagnostic information about the issue. Typically, this may be a description of how a value is erroneous, or a stack dump to help trace the issuediagnostics : string [0..1]This element is depracated because it is XML specific. It is replaced by issue.expression, which is format independent, and simpler to parse. For resource issues, this will be a simple XPath limited to element names, repetition indicators and the default child access that identifies one of the elements in the resource that caused this issue to be raised. For HTTP errors, will be "http." + the parameter namelocation : string [0..*]A [simple subset of FHIRPath](fhirpath.html#simple) limited to element names, repetition indicators and the default child access that identifies one of the elements in the resource that caused this issue to be raisedexpression : string [0..*]An error, warning or information message that results from a system actionissue[1..*]

XML Template

<OperationOutcome xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> doco
 <!-- from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language -->
 <!-- from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension -->
 <issue>  <!-- 1..* A single issue associated with the action -->
  <severity value="[code]"/><!-- 1..1 fatal | error | warning | information -->
  <code value="[code]"/><!-- 1..1 Error or warning code -->
  <details><!-- 0..1 CodeableConcept Additional details about the error --></details>
  <diagnostics value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Additional diagnostic information about the issue -->
  <location value="[string]"/><!-- 0..* Deprecated: Path of element(s) related to issue -->
  <expression value="[string]"/><!-- 0..* FHIRPath of element(s) related to issue -->
 </issue>
</OperationOutcome>

Turtle Template

@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> .doco


[ a fhir:OperationOutcome;
  fhir:nodeRole fhir:treeRoot; # if this is the parser root

  # from Resource: .id, .meta, .implicitRules, and .language
  # from DomainResource: .text, .contained, .extension, and .modifierExtension
  fhir:OperationOutcome.issue [ # 1..* A single issue associated with the action
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.severity [ code ]; # 1..1 fatal | error | warning | information
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.code [ code ]; # 1..1 Error or warning code
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.details [ CodeableConcept ]; # 0..1 Additional details about the error
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.diagnostics [ string ]; # 0..1 Additional diagnostic information about the issue
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.location [ string ], ... ; # 0..* Deprecated: Path of element(s) related to issue
    fhir:OperationOutcome.issue.expression [ string ], ... ; # 0..* FHIRPath of element(s) related to issue
  ], ...;
]

Changes since Release 3

OperationOutcome
OperationOutcome.issue.severity
  • No longer marked as Modifier

See the Full Difference for further information

This analysis is available as XML or JSON.

See R3 <--> R4 Conversion Maps (status = 6 tests that all execute ok. 6 fail round-trip testing and 6 r3 resources are invalid (0 errors).)

 

See the Profiles & Extensions and the alternate definitions: Master Definition XML + JSON, XML Schema/Schematron + JSON Schema, ShEx (for Turtle) + see the extensions & the dependency analysis

PathDefinitionTypeReference
OperationOutcome.issue.severity How the issue affects the success of the action.RequiredIssueSeverity
OperationOutcome.issue.code A code that describes the type of issue.RequiredIssueType
OperationOutcome.issue.details A code that provides details as the exact issue.ExampleOperationOutcomeCodes

On the RESTful interface, operation outcome resources are only relevant when a level of computable detail is required that is more granular than that provided by the HTTP response codes. This granularity could include:

  • more detail about the location of an issue
  • the ability to identify multiple distinct issues
  • provision of finer error codes that connect to known business failure states

Operation outcomes returned SHOULD be in alignment with the HTTP response code. For example, if the HTTP code indicates a failure (300+), at least one of the issues should have a severity of "error", indicating the reason for the failure.

Operation outcomes must include at least one issue. See the All OK example for a template for an operation that returns no errors.

Each issue in an operation outcome SHOUD have a expression that reports a location for the issue. A correctly populated expression can allow client systems to:

  • Connect return errors with the appropriate UI widget
  • Route errors to the correct application or system log
  • Develop more intelligent testing applications

In order to support these kinds of usages, applications need to use the location element consistently. Applications can use the location element to refer to a location inside a resource, or some location in the HTTP request (when appropriate).

Error locations are always reported using a simplified FHIRPath statement. In addition to the simplified FHIRPath restrictions, the expression SHALL not contain a .resolve() function. These examples are legal:

 <expression value="Patient.identifier"/>
  "expression" : "Patient.identifier[2].value"

but this is not:

  "expression" : "Patient.identifier.where(system.value='http://example.com/mrn').value"

Servers may also need to report errors in the HTTP headers - especially query parameters when processing searches. Errors are reported using a case sensitive location that has two parts, a fixed "http" and the header or query parameter name separated by a ".". Some examples:

Location Description
http."name:exact" A reference to the search parameter "name" with the modifier ":exact"
http.Authorization A reference to the Authorization header - perhaps to indicate that it is missing, and some form of authentication is required.