9.10 Resource DetectedIssue - Content

9.10.1 Scope and Usage

This resource applies to various circumstances where there is a concern about an existing or proposed set of clinical activity. The issue could relate to single, proposed, or multiple actions. It does not apply to technical issues (e.g. lack of user permissions) but could relate to violation of patient consent limitations. Examples include:

• Drug-drug interactions
• Inappropriate therapy (wrong dose, frequency, body site)
• Duplicate therapy

This resource represents a specific instance of a potential issue for a particular patient. It is not intended to represent general patient-independent knowledge. This resource is also not intended to be used in defining general prohibitions on actions such as "No NSAIDs", "No solid oral dose forms" or "No MRIs - metalic tatoos". These guidelines can be captured using the AllergyIntolerance, and/or Flag resources. Similarly this resource is not to be used to capture clinical facts that may imply contraindications such as pregnancy, breast feeding, patient preferences, past procedures, etc. These would be represented using Condition, Procedure or other resources.

9.10.2 Boundaries and Relationships

This resource only applies to documenting a risk associated with a specific planned or ongoing action, not a general propensity to risk. The latter would be handled using AllergyIntolerance for substance-specific issues or Flag for other types of issues.

This resource is limited to clinical issues associated with a proposed or ongoing action. It does not cover technical issues such as lack of permission, duplicate identifiers and other business rule violations. Technical issues are conveyed using the OperationOutcome resource. It is possible to have both OperationOutcome and DetectedIssue together, where the OperationOutcome might indicate that a requested action was rejected due to a clinical issue and the DetectedIssue provides the details of the issue.

9.10.3 Background and Context

Detected issues are typically identified by decision support systems. However, they may also be captured directly by clinicians. The latter typically happens for one of two reasons:

1. A clinician wishes to communicate an issue to another clinician whose responsibility would be to resolve it (e.g. a pharmacist identifying an issue with a prescription prior to putting it on hold)
2. A clinician wishes to pre-emptively identify that an issue is known and is being managed (to avoid red flags being raised as part of downstream workflow); e.g. Submitting a new order and including a link to a "duplicate therapy" issue with mitigation indicating that the therapy is not considered to be duplicate.

Decision-support generated issues can result from calling a decision-support engine directly (e.g. via a custom OperationDefinition) or as part of an attempt to perform some other function (creating an order, submitting an insurance claim, capturing a medication list). When the issues are generated as a byproduct of performing some other sort of action, they may be included in the "response" to the requested action in the same manner as an OperationOutcome. In fact, both may be present - the OperationOutcome indicating that there was a warning or error associated with the request and a DetectedIssue providing the clinical details. (The OperationOutcome could point to the DetectedIssue via an extension.)

In those circumstances where requested operations are rejected as a result of a detected issue, the workflow may support allowing the operation to be re-tried, provided that the identified issue is included as part of the submission (possibly also including a mitigation). In doing so, the sender acknowledges the issue and takes responsibility for it, thus allowing the requested operation to proceed. See Linking to Detected Issues for guidance on how a DetectedIssue instance might be included as part of another operation.

Systems that require such workflows should document expected behavior as part of their CapabilityStatement declarations.

• Structure
• UML
• XML
• JSON
• Turtle
• R2 Diff
• All

Structure

Name	Flags	Card.	Type	Description & Constraints
DetectedIssue			DomainResource	Clinical issue with action
patient	Σ	0..1	Reference(Patient)	Associated patient
category	Σ	0..1	CodeableConcept	Issue Category, e.g. drug-drug, duplicate therapy, etc. Detected Issue Category (Preferred)
severity	Σ	0..1	code	high | moderate | low DetectedIssueSeverity (Required)
implicated	Σ	0..*	Reference(Any)	Problem resource
detail		0..1	string	Description and context
date	Σ	0..1	dateTime	When identified
author	Σ	0..1	Reference(Practitioner | Device)	The provider or device that identified the issue
identifier	Σ	0..1	Identifier	Unique id for the detected issue
reference		0..1	uri	Authority for issue
mitigation		0..*	BackboneElement	Step taken to address
action		1..1	CodeableConcept	What mitigation? Detected Issue Mitigation Action (Preferred)
date		0..1	dateTime	Date committed
author		0..1	Reference(Practitioner)	Who is committing?
Documentation for this format

<DetectedIssue xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> 
 <!-- from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language -->
 <!-- from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension -->
 <patient><!-- 0..1 Reference(Patient) Associated patient --></patient>
 <category><!-- 0..1 CodeableConcept Issue Category, e.g. drug-drug, duplicate therapy, etc. --></category>
 <severity value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 high | moderate | low -->
 <implicated><!-- 0..* Reference(Any) Problem resource --></implicated>
 <detail value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Description and context -->
 <date value="[dateTime]"/><!-- 0..1 When identified -->
 <author><!-- 0..1 Reference(Practitioner|Device) The provider or device that identified the issue --></author>
 <identifier><!-- 0..1 Identifier Unique id for the detected issue --></identifier>
 <reference value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..1 Authority for issue -->
 <mitigation>  <!-- 0..* Step taken to address -->
  <action><!-- 1..1 CodeableConcept What mitigation? --></action>
  <date value="[dateTime]"/><!-- 0..1 Date committed -->
  <author><!-- 0..1 Reference(Practitioner) Who is committing? --></author>
 </mitigation>
</DetectedIssue>

{
  "resourceType" : "DetectedIssue",
  // from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language
  // from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension
  "patient" : { Reference(Patient) }, // Associated patient
  "category" : { CodeableConcept }, // Issue Category, e.g. drug-drug, duplicate therapy, etc.
  "severity" : "<code>", // high | moderate | low
  "implicated" : [{ Reference(Any) }], // Problem resource
  "detail" : "<string>", // Description and context
  "date" : "<dateTime>", // When identified
  "author" : { Reference(Practitioner|Device) }, // The provider or device that identified the issue
  "identifier" : { Identifier }, // Unique id for the detected issue
  "reference" : "<uri>", // Authority for issue
  "mitigation" : [{ // Step taken to address
    "action" : { CodeableConcept }, // R!  What mitigation?
    "date" : "<dateTime>", // Date committed
    "author" : { Reference(Practitioner) } // Who is committing?
  }]
}

@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> .


[ a fhir:DetectedIssue;
  fhir:nodeRole fhir:treeRoot; # if this is the parser root

  # from Resource: .id, .meta, .implicitRules, and .language
  # from DomainResource: .text, .contained, .extension, and .modifierExtension
  fhir:DetectedIssue.patient [ Reference(Patient) ]; # 0..1 Associated patient
  fhir:DetectedIssue.category [ CodeableConcept ]; # 0..1 Issue Category, e.g. drug-drug, duplicate therapy, etc.
  fhir:DetectedIssue.severity [ code ]; # 0..1 high | moderate | low
  fhir:DetectedIssue.implicated [ Reference(Any) ], ... ; # 0..* Problem resource
  fhir:DetectedIssue.detail [ string ]; # 0..1 Description and context
  fhir:DetectedIssue.date [ dateTime ]; # 0..1 When identified
  fhir:DetectedIssue.author [ Reference(Practitioner|Device) ]; # 0..1 The provider or device that identified the issue
  fhir:DetectedIssue.identifier [ Identifier ]; # 0..1 Unique id for the detected issue
  fhir:DetectedIssue.reference [ uri ]; # 0..1 Authority for issue
  fhir:DetectedIssue.mitigation [ # 0..* Step taken to address
    fhir:DetectedIssue.mitigation.action [ CodeableConcept ]; # 1..1 What mitigation?
    fhir:DetectedIssue.mitigation.date [ dateTime ]; # 0..1 Date committed
    fhir:DetectedIssue.mitigation.author [ Reference(Practitioner) ]; # 0..1 Who is committing?
  ], ...;
]

Structure

Name	Flags	Card.	Type	Description & Constraints
DetectedIssue			DomainResource	Clinical issue with action
patient	Σ	0..1	Reference(Patient)	Associated patient
category	Σ	0..1	CodeableConcept	Issue Category, e.g. drug-drug, duplicate therapy, etc. Detected Issue Category (Preferred)
severity	Σ	0..1	code	high | moderate | low DetectedIssueSeverity (Required)
implicated	Σ	0..*	Reference(Any)	Problem resource
detail		0..1	string	Description and context
date	Σ	0..1	dateTime	When identified
author	Σ	0..1	Reference(Practitioner | Device)	The provider or device that identified the issue
identifier	Σ	0..1	Identifier	Unique id for the detected issue
reference		0..1	uri	Authority for issue
mitigation		0..*	BackboneElement	Step taken to address
action		1..1	CodeableConcept	What mitigation? Detected Issue Mitigation Action (Preferred)
date		0..1	dateTime	Date committed
author		0..1	Reference(Practitioner)	Who is committing?
Documentation for this format

UML Diagram (Legend)

XML Template

<DetectedIssue xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> 
 <!-- from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language -->
 <!-- from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension -->
 <patient><!-- 0..1 Reference(Patient) Associated patient --></patient>
 <category><!-- 0..1 CodeableConcept Issue Category, e.g. drug-drug, duplicate therapy, etc. --></category>
 <severity value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 high | moderate | low -->
 <implicated><!-- 0..* Reference(Any) Problem resource --></implicated>
 <detail value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Description and context -->
 <date value="[dateTime]"/><!-- 0..1 When identified -->
 <author><!-- 0..1 Reference(Practitioner|Device) The provider or device that identified the issue --></author>
 <identifier><!-- 0..1 Identifier Unique id for the detected issue --></identifier>
 <reference value="[uri]"/><!-- 0..1 Authority for issue -->
 <mitigation>  <!-- 0..* Step taken to address -->
  <action><!-- 1..1 CodeableConcept What mitigation? --></action>
  <date value="[dateTime]"/><!-- 0..1 Date committed -->
  <author><!-- 0..1 Reference(Practitioner) Who is committing? --></author>
 </mitigation>
</DetectedIssue>

JSON Template

{
  "resourceType" : "DetectedIssue",
  // from Resource: id, meta, implicitRules, and language
  // from DomainResource: text, contained, extension, and modifierExtension
  "patient" : { Reference(Patient) }, // Associated patient
  "category" : { CodeableConcept }, // Issue Category, e.g. drug-drug, duplicate therapy, etc.
  "severity" : "<code>", // high | moderate | low
  "implicated" : [{ Reference(Any) }], // Problem resource
  "detail" : "<string>", // Description and context
  "date" : "<dateTime>", // When identified
  "author" : { Reference(Practitioner|Device) }, // The provider or device that identified the issue
  "identifier" : { Identifier }, // Unique id for the detected issue
  "reference" : "<uri>", // Authority for issue
  "mitigation" : [{ // Step taken to address
    "action" : { CodeableConcept }, // R!  What mitigation?
    "date" : "<dateTime>", // Date committed
    "author" : { Reference(Practitioner) } // Who is committing?
  }]
}

Turtle Template

@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> .


[ a fhir:DetectedIssue;
  fhir:nodeRole fhir:treeRoot; # if this is the parser root

  # from Resource: .id, .meta, .implicitRules, and .language
  # from DomainResource: .text, .contained, .extension, and .modifierExtension
  fhir:DetectedIssue.patient [ Reference(Patient) ]; # 0..1 Associated patient
  fhir:DetectedIssue.category [ CodeableConcept ]; # 0..1 Issue Category, e.g. drug-drug, duplicate therapy, etc.
  fhir:DetectedIssue.severity [ code ]; # 0..1 high | moderate | low
  fhir:DetectedIssue.implicated [ Reference(Any) ], ... ; # 0..* Problem resource
  fhir:DetectedIssue.detail [ string ]; # 0..1 Description and context
  fhir:DetectedIssue.date [ dateTime ]; # 0..1 When identified
  fhir:DetectedIssue.author [ Reference(Practitioner|Device) ]; # 0..1 The provider or device that identified the issue
  fhir:DetectedIssue.identifier [ Identifier ]; # 0..1 Unique id for the detected issue
  fhir:DetectedIssue.reference [ uri ]; # 0..1 Authority for issue
  fhir:DetectedIssue.mitigation [ # 0..* Step taken to address
    fhir:DetectedIssue.mitigation.action [ CodeableConcept ]; # 1..1 What mitigation?
    fhir:DetectedIssue.mitigation.date [ dateTime ]; # 0..1 Date committed
    fhir:DetectedIssue.mitigation.author [ Reference(Practitioner) ]; # 0..1 Who is committing?
  ], ...;
]

Changes since DSTU2

DetectedIssue

No Changes

See the Full Difference for further information