This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v0.5.0: DSTU 2 Ballot 2). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
. Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3 R2


As an example, consider slicing extensions. The base extension on every element is defined as a list (0..*) of extensions, and each extension has a url that identifies it, and a value. Consider an example where a profile defines that for a particular element (named Patient) two extensions, with URLs http://acme.com/a and http://acme.com/b. In addition, the profile allows other extensions to be used.
Technically, the profile achieves this by "slicing" the extension list, into two slices, and saying that the slicing is "open" - that there can be other slices introduced. Here's the relevant parts of the Profile on patient:
<Profile xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<!-- snip -->
<structure>
<!-- snip -->
<type value="Patient"/>
<snapshot>
<element>
<path value="Patient"/>
<!-- snip -->
</element>
<element>
<path value="Patient.extension"/>
<!-- this first element defines the slicing, and carries the base definition forward -->
<slicing>
<discriminator value="url"/> <!-- Extensions are always discriminated by URL -->
<ordered value="false"/> <!-- we don't care what order they appear in -->
<rules value="open"/> <!-- other extensions can be used -->
</slicing>
<!-- -- snip definition -->
</element>
<!-- first extension -->
<element>
<path value="Patient.extension"/>
<definition>
<!-- snip most of definition -->
<type>
<code value="Extension"/>
<!-- the profile for an extension is a reference to the extension definition itself -
this implies a profile, and happens to fix the @url value to the desired URL -->
<profile value="http://acme.com/a"/>
</type>
</definition>
</element>
<!-- first extension -->
<element>
<path value="Patient.extension"/>
<definition>
<!-- snip most of definition -->
<type>
<code value="Extension"/>
<!-- the profile for an extension is a reference to the extension definition itself -
this implies a profile, and happens to fix the @url value to the desired URL -->
<profile value="http://acme.com/b"/>
</type>
</definition>
</element>
<!-- snip rest of profile -->
</snapshot>
</structure>
</Profile>
Here's a patient example that conforms to this profile:
<Patient xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<!-- two extensions, the order doesn't matter -->
<extension url="http://acme.com/b">
<!-- this has the right url, and so matches the second slice -->
<!-- snip whatever value extension would have -->
</extension>
<extension url="http://acme.com/a">
<!-- this has the right url, and so matches the first slice -->
<!-- snip whatever value extension would have -->
</extension>
<!-- the rest of patient -->
</Patient>

In this example, a profile on an diagnostic report says that it must have 4 observations, each with a different LOINC code (e.g. a classic lab panel). In this case (taken from the Example Lipid Profile), the structure that applies to DiagnosticReport will say that there is 4 slices on DiagnosticReport.result, each conforming to a different structure, which are also contained in the same profile. Each of those structures will constrain the LOINC code in the observation.
<Profile xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<!-- snip -->
<structure>
<!-- first structure, the DiagnosticReport -->
<type value="DiagnosticReport"/>
<base value="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/DiagnosticReport"/>
<name value="LipidProfile"/>
<!-- snip -->
<snapshot>
<!-- snip elements -->
<element>
<!-- first definition for result -->
<path value="DiagnosticReport.result"/>
<slicing>
<!-- this is sliced by the name value of the target of the reference -->
<discriminator value="reference.name"/>
<!-- have to be in the specified order -->
<ordered value="true"/>
<!-- this profile says, no other observations allowed -->
<rules value="closed"/>
</slicing>
<!-- snip definition -->
</element>
<!-- first slice: Cholesterol -->
<element>
<path value="DiagnosticReport.result"/>
<!-- name is just for documentation purposes - not used any other way -->
<name value="Cholesterol"/>
<definition>
<!-- snip definition parts -->
<type>
<code value="Reference"/>
<!-- this element must conform to the "Cholesterol" structure -->
<profile value="#Cholesterol"/>
</type>
</definition>
</element>
<!-- next 3 slices all the same, but different names for profile -->
<element>
<path value="DiagnosticReport.result"/>
<!-- name is just for documentation purposes - not used any other way -->
<name value="Triglyceride"/>
<definition>
<!-- snip definition parts -->
<type>
<code value="Reference"/>
<!-- this element must conform to the "Cholesterol" structure -->
<profile value="#Triglyceride"/>
</type>
</definition>
</element>
<element>
<path value="DiagnosticReport.result"/>
<!-- name is just for documentation purposes - not used any other way -->
<name value="LDLCholesterol"/>
<definition>
<!-- snip definition parts -->
<type>
<code value="Reference"/>
<!-- this element must conform to the "Cholesterol" structure -->
<profile value="#LDLCholesterol"/>
</type>
</definition>
</element>
<element>
<path value="DiagnosticReport.result"/>
<!-- name is just for documentation purposes - not used any other way -->
<name value="HDLCholesterol"/>
<definition>
<!-- snip definition parts -->
<type>
<code value="Reference"/>
<!-- this element must conform to the "Cholesterol" structure -->
<profile value="#HDLCholesterol"/>
</type>
</definition>
</element>
<!-- snip elements -->
</snapshot>
</structure>
<!-- now, the second structure, for the Cholesterol profile -->
<structure>
<type value="Observation"/>
<base value="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Observation"/>
<name value="Cholesterol"/> <!-- this is the target of #Cholesterol -->
<snapshot>
<!-- snip elements -->
<element>
<!-- this the element definition for name. Because of the
slicing / discriminator rules in the LipidReport profile
that references it, it is required to fix the value of
the name element -->
<path value="Observation.name"/>
<definition>
<!-- there's actually 3 ways to fix a CodeableConcept
to a single fixed value. Here, we used the simplest one -->
<valueCodeableConcept>
<!-- just fix the value to the right code -->
<coding>
<system value="http://loinc.org"/>
<code value="35200-5"/>
<display value="Cholesterol"/>
</coding>
</valueCodeableConcept>
</definition>
</element>
<!-- snip elements -->
</snapshot>
</structure>
<!-- Triglyceride profile -->
<structure>
<type value="Observation"/>
<base value="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Observation"/>
<name value="Triglyceride"/> <!-- this is the target of #Cholesterol -->
<snapshot>
<!-- snip elements -->
<element>
<!-- this the element definition for name. Because of the
slicing / discriminator rules in the LipidReport profile
that references it, it is required to fix the value of
the name element -->
<path value="Observation.name"/>
<definition>
<!-- there's actually 3 ways to fix a CodeableConcept
to a single fixed value. Here, we used the simplest one -->
<valueCodeableConcept>
<!-- just fix the value to the right code -->
<coding>
<system value="http://loinc.org"/>
<code value="35217-9"/>
<display value="Triglyceride"/>
</coding>
</valueCodeableConcept>
</definition>
</element>
<!-- snip elements -->
</snapshot>
</structure>
<!-- LDLCholesterol profile -->
<structure>
<type value="Observation"/>
<base value="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Observation"/>
<name value="LDLCholesterol"/> <!-- this is the target of #Cholesterol -->
<snapshot>
<!-- snip elements -->
<element>
<!-- this the element definition for name. Because of the
slicing / discriminator rules in the LipidReport profile
that references it, it is required to fix the value of
the name element -->
<path value="Observation.name"/>
<definition>
<!-- because of the way that LDL cholesterol measurements works
(well, in this context- it varies), there's 2 different LOINC
codes for either measured or calculated. So here, we bind to
a value set -->
<binding>
<name value="LDL Cholesterol codes"/>
<conformance value="required"/> <!-- must be required if this is a discriminator -->
<!-- snip the actual value set reference, but it refers to a value
set with two LOINC codes, one for each kind of LDL, which in
this case are LOINC codes 18262-6 and 13457-7 -->
</binding>
</definition>
</element>
<!-- snip elements -->
</snapshot>
</structure>
<!-- HDLCholesterol profile -->
<structure>
<type value="Observation"/>
<base value="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Observation"/>
<name value="HDLCholesterol"/> <!-- this is the target of #Cholesterol -->
<snapshot>
<!-- snip elements -->
<element>
<!-- this the element definition for name. Because of the
slicing / discriminator rules in the LipidReport profile
that references it, it is required to fix the value of
the name element -->
<path value="Observation.name"/>
<definition>
<!-- there's actually 3 ways to fix a CodeableConcept
to a single fixed value. Here, we used the simplest one -->
<valueCodeableConcept>
<!-- just fix the value to the right code -->
<coding>
<system value="http://loinc.org"/>
<code value="2085-9"/>
<display value="LDL Cholesterol"/>
</coding>
</valueCodeableConcept>
</definition>
</element>
<!-- snip elements -->
</snapshot>
</structure>
</Profile>
Here is an instance that meets the rules for this profile:
<!-- first, the diagnostic report -->
<DiagnosticReport xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<!-- snip -->
<!-- here's the set of results. We don't know what
slices they are or anything until we go off, find
the references, and look in them -->
<result>
<reference value="Observation/cholesterol"/>
</result>
<result>
<reference value="Observation/triglyceride"/>
</result>
<result>
<reference value="Observation/ldlcholesterol"/>
</result>
<result>
<reference value="Observation/hdlcholesterol"/>
</result>
<!-- snip -->
</DiagnosticReport>
<!-- Observation, id = cholesterol -->
<Observation xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<!-- the observation starts with the name, as specified
by the profile for the first slice -->
<name>
<coding>
<system value="http://loinc.org"/>
<code value="35200-5"/>
<display value="Cholesterol"/>
</coding>
</name>
<!-- snip -->
</Observation>
<!-- Observation, id = triglyceride -->
<!-- this code matches the second slice. good -->
<Observation xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<name>
<coding>
<system value="http://loinc.org"/>
<code value="35217-9"/>
<display value="Triglyceride"/>
</coding>
</name>
<!-- snip -->
</Observation>
<!-- Observation, id = hdlcholesterol -->
<!-- this code matches the fourth slice. good -->
<Observation xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<name>
<coding>
<system value="http://loinc.org"/>
<code value="2085-9"/>
<display value="HDL Cholesterol"/>
</coding>
</name>
<!-- snip -->
</Observation>
<!-- Observation, id = ldlcholesterol -->
<!-- this code matches the third slice. good -->
<Observation id="ldlcholesterol">
<name>
<coding>
<system value="http://loinc.org"/>
<code value="13457-7"/>
<display value="LDL Chol. (Calc)"/>
</coding>
</name>
<!-- snip -->
</Observation>
Note that this version isn't valid, because the slices are not in the correct order:
<!-- first, the diagnostic report -->
<DiagnosticReport xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
<!-- snip -->
<!-- here's the set of results. We don't know what
slices they are or anything until we go off, find
the references, and look in them -->
<result>
<reference value="Observation/cholesterol"/>
</result>
<result>
<reference value="Observation/triglyceride"/>
</result>
<result>
<reference value="Observation/hdlcholesterol"/>
</result>
<result>
<reference value="Observation/ldlcholesterol"/>
</result>
<!-- snip -->
</DiagnosticReport>