This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v1.0.2: DSTU 2). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
Definition for Value SetXDSRelationshipType
{ "resourceType": "ValueSet", "id": "xds-relationship-type", "meta": { "lastUpdated": "2015-10-24T07:41:03.495+11:00", "profile": [ "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-shareable-definition" ] }, "text": { "status": "generated", "div": "<div>!-- Snipped for Brevity --></div>" }, "extension": [ { "url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-oid", "valueUri": "urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.2.383" } ], "url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/xds-relationship-type", "version": "1.0.2", "name": "XDSRelationshipType", "status": "draft", "experimental": false, "publisher": "HL7 (FHIR Project)", "contact": [ { "telecom": [ { "system": "other", "value": "http://hl7.org/fhir" }, { "system": "email", "value": "fhir@lists.hl7.org" } ] } ], "date": "2015-10-24T07:41:03+11:00", "description": "The kind of relationship between two XDS documents.", "codeSystem": { "extension": [ { "url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-oid", "valueUri": "urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.1.383" } ], "system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/xds-relationship-type", "version": "1.0.2", "caseSensitive": true, "concept": [ { "code": "APND", "display": "APND", "definition": "A separate XDS document that references a prior document, and may extend or alter the observations in the prior document." }, { "code": "RPLC", "display": "RPLC", "definition": "A new version of an existing document." }, { "code": "XFRM", "display": "XFRM", "definition": "A transformed document is derived by a machine translation from some other format." }, { "code": "XFRM_RPLC", "display": "XFRM_RPLC", "definition": "Both a XFRM and a RPLC relationship." }, { "code": "signs", "display": "Signs", "definition": "This document signs the target document." } ] } }
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.