FHIR Cross-Version Extensions package for FHIR R4 from FHIR R5
0.0.1-snapshot-2 - informative International flag

FHIR Cross-Version Extensions package for FHIR R4 from FHIR R5 - Version 0.0.1-snapshot-2. See the Directory of published versions

ValueSet: Cross-version VS for R5.SecurityIntegrityProvenanceObservationType for use in FHIR R4

Official URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/ValueSet/R5-v3-SecurityIntegrityProvenanceObservationType-for-R4 Version: 0.0.1-snapshot-2
Standards status: Informative Maturity Level: 0 Computable Name: R5_v3_SecurityIntegrityProvenanceObservationType_for_R4

This cross-version ValueSet represents concepts from http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SecurityIntegrityProvenanceObservationType 2.0.0 for use in FHIR R4. Concepts not present here have direct equivalent mappings crossing all versions from R5 to R4.

References

This value set is not used here; it may be used elsewhere (e.g. specifications and/or implementations that use this content)

Logical Definition (CLD)

  • Include these codes as defined in http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode version 8.0.0
    CodeDisplayDefinition
    SECINTPRVABOBSsecurity integrity provenance asserted by observationType of security metadata observation made about the integrity provenance of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which indicates the entity that made assertions about the resource. The asserting entity may not be the original informant about the resource.

    **Examples:** Types of security integrity provenance asserted by observation metadata, which may value the observation, including:

    * assertions about an IT resource by a patient
    * assertions about an IT resource by a clinician
    * assertions about an IT resource by a device
    SECINTPRVRBOBSsecurity integrity provenance reported by observationType of security metadata observation made about the integrity provenance of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which indicates the entity that reported the existence of the resource. The reporting entity may not be the original author of the resource.

    **Examples:** Types of security integrity provenance reported by observation metadata, which may value the observation, include:

    * reports about an IT resource by a patient
    * reports about an IT resource by a clinician
    * reports about an IT resource by a device

 

Expansion

This value set expansion contains 2 concepts.

CodeSystemDisplayDefinition
  SECINTPRVABOBShttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCodesecurity integrity provenance asserted by observation

Type of security metadata observation made about the integrity provenance of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which indicates the entity that made assertions about the resource. The asserting entity may not be the original informant about the resource.

Examples: Types of security integrity provenance asserted by observation metadata, which may value the observation, including:

  • assertions about an IT resource by a patient
  • assertions about an IT resource by a clinician
  • assertions about an IT resource by a device
  SECINTPRVRBOBShttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCodesecurity integrity provenance reported by observation

Type of security metadata observation made about the integrity provenance of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which indicates the entity that reported the existence of the resource. The reporting entity may not be the original author of the resource.

Examples: Types of security integrity provenance reported by observation metadata, which may value the observation, include:

  • reports about an IT resource by a patient
  • reports about an IT resource by a clinician
  • reports about an IT resource by a device

Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:

Level A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. In this scheme, some codes are under other codes, and imply that the code they are under also applies
System The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere)
Code The code (used as the code in the resource instance)
Display The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application
Definition An explanation of the meaning of the concept
Comments Additional notes about how to use the code