FHIR Cross-Version Extensions package for FHIR R4 from FHIR R5 - Version 0.0.1-snapshot-2. See the Directory of published versions
Official URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/ValueSet/R5-v3-SecurityControlObservationType-for-R4 | Version: 0.0.1-snapshot-2 | |||
Standards status: Informative | Maturity Level: 0 | Computable Name: R5_v3_SecurityControlObservationType_for_R4 |
This cross-version ValueSet represents concepts from http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SecurityControlObservationType | 2.0.0 for use in FHIR R4. Concepts not present here have direct equivalent mappings crossing all versions from R5 to R4. |
References
This value set is not used here; it may be used elsewhere (e.g. specifications and/or implementations that use this content)
http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode
version 8.0.0
Code | Display | Definition |
SECCONOBS | security control observation | Type of security metadata observation made about the control of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which may be used to make access control decisions. Security control metadata convey instructions to users and receivers for secure distribution, transmission, and storage; dictate obligations or mandated actions; specify any action prohibited by refrain policy such as dissemination controls; and stipulate the permissible purpose of use of an IT resource. *Rationale:* A security control observation supports requirement to specify applicable management, operational, and technical controls (i.e., safeguards or countermeasures) prescribed for an information system to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system and its information. \[FIPS 199\] **Examples:** Types of security control metadata include: * handling caveats * dissemination controls * obligations * refrain policies * purpose of use constraints |
This value set expansion contains 1 concepts.
Code | System | Display | Definition |
SECCONOBS | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode | security control observation | Type of security metadata observation made about the control of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which may be used to make access control decisions. Security control metadata convey instructions to users and receivers for secure distribution, transmission, and storage; dictate obligations or mandated actions; specify any action prohibited by refrain policy such as dissemination controls; and stipulate the permissible purpose of use of an IT resource. Rationale: A security control observation supports requirement to specify applicable management, operational, and technical controls (i.e., safeguards or countermeasures) prescribed for an information system to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system and its information. [FIPS 199] Examples: Types of security control metadata include:
|
Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:
Level | A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. In this scheme, some codes are under other codes, and imply that the code they are under also applies |
System | The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere) |
Code | The code (used as the code in the resource instance) |
Display | The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application |
Definition | An explanation of the meaning of the concept |
Comments | Additional notes about how to use the code |