FHIR Cross-Version Extensions package for FHIR R4 from FHIR R5
0.0.1-snapshot-2 - informative International flag

FHIR Cross-Version Extensions package for FHIR R4 from FHIR R5 - Version 0.0.1-snapshot-2. See the Directory of published versions

ValueSet: Cross-version VS for R5.ActRelationshipIsManifestationOf for use in FHIR R4

Official URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/ValueSet/R5-v3-ActRelationshipIsManifestationOf-for-R4 Version: 0.0.1-snapshot-2
Standards status: Informative Maturity Level: 0 Computable Name: R5_v3_ActRelationshipIsManifestationOf_for_R4

This cross-version ValueSet represents concepts from http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActRelationshipIsManifestationOf 2.0.0 for use in FHIR R4. Concepts not present here have direct equivalent mappings crossing all versions from R5 to R4.

References

This value set is not used here; it may be used elsewhere (e.g. specifications and/or implementations that use this content)

Logical Definition (CLD)

  • Include these codes as defined in http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipType version 3.1.0
    CodeDisplayDefinition
    MFSTis manifestation ofAn assertion that a new observation may be the manifestation of another existing observation or action. This assumption is attributed to the same actor who asserts the manifestation. This is stronger and more specific than an inverted support link. For example, an agitated appearance can be asserted to be the manifestation (effect) of a known hyperthyroxia. This expresses that one might not have realized a symptom if it would not be a common manifestation of a known condition. The target (cause) may be any service, while the source (manifestation) must be an observation.

 

Expansion

This value set expansion contains 1 concepts.

CodeSystemDisplayDefinition
  MFSThttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipTypeis manifestation of

An assertion that a new observation may be the manifestation of another existing observation or action. This assumption is attributed to the same actor who asserts the manifestation. This is stronger and more specific than an inverted support link. For example, an agitated appearance can be asserted to be the manifestation (effect) of a known hyperthyroxia. This expresses that one might not have realized a symptom if it would not be a common manifestation of a known condition. The target (cause) may be any service, while the source (manifestation) must be an observation.

Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:

Level A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. In this scheme, some codes are under other codes, and imply that the code they are under also applies
System The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere)
Code The code (used as the code in the resource instance)
Display The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application
Definition An explanation of the meaning of the concept
Comments Additional notes about how to use the code