FHIR Cross-Version Extensions package for FHIR R4 from FHIR R5
0.0.1-snapshot-2 - informative International flag

FHIR Cross-Version Extensions package for FHIR R4 from FHIR R5 - Version 0.0.1-snapshot-2. See the Directory of published versions

ValueSet: Cross-version VS for R5.ActRelationshipDocumentHQMF for use in FHIR R4

Official URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/ValueSet/R5-v3-ActRelationshipDocumentHQMF-for-R4 Version: 0.0.1-snapshot-2
Standards status: Informative Maturity Level: 0 Computable Name: R5_v3_ActRelationshipDocumentHQMF_for_R4

This cross-version ValueSet represents concepts from http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActRelationshipDocumentHQMF 2.0.0 for use in FHIR R4. Concepts not present here have direct equivalent mappings crossing all versions from R5 to R4.

References

This value set is not used here; it may be used elsewhere (e.g. specifications and/or implementations that use this content)

Logical Definition (CLD)

  • Include these codes as defined in http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipType version 3.1.0
    CodeDisplayDefinition
    COMPhas componentThe target act is a component of the source act, with no semantics regarding composition or aggregation implied.
    DRIVis derived fromAssociates a derived Act with its input parameters. E.G., an anion-gap observation can be associated as being derived from given sodium-, (potassium-,), chloride-, and bicarbonate-observations. The narrative content (Act.text) of a source act is wholly machine-derived from the collection of target acts.
    RPLCreplacesA replacement source act replaces an existing target act. The state of the target act being replaced becomes obselete, but the act is typically still retained in the system for historical reference. The source and target must be of the same type.
    USEusesIndicates that the source act makes use of (or will make use of) the information content of the target act.

    *UsageNotes:* A usage relationship only makes sense if the target act is authored and occurs independently of the source act. Otherwise a simpler relationship such as COMP would be appropriate.

    *Rationale:* There is a need when defining a clinical trial protocol to indicate that the protocol makes use of other protocol or treatment specifications. This is stronger than the assertion of "references". References may exist without usage, and in a clinical trial protocol is common to assert both: what other specifications does this trial use and what other specifications does it merely reference.
    XCRPTExcerptsThe source is an excerpt from the target.
    XFRMtransformationUsed when the target Act is a transformation of the source Act. (For instance, used to show that a CDA document is a transformation of a DICOM SR document.)

 

Expansion

This value set expansion contains 6 concepts.

CodeSystemDisplayDefinition
  COMPhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipTypehas component

The target act is a component of the source act, with no semantics regarding composition or aggregation implied.

  DRIVhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipTypeis derived from

Associates a derived Act with its input parameters. E.G., an anion-gap observation can be associated as being derived from given sodium-, (potassium-,), chloride-, and bicarbonate-observations. The narrative content (Act.text) of a source act is wholly machine-derived from the collection of target acts.

  RPLChttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipTypereplaces

A replacement source act replaces an existing target act. The state of the target act being replaced becomes obselete, but the act is typically still retained in the system for historical reference. The source and target must be of the same type.

  USEhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipTypeuses

Indicates that the source act makes use of (or will make use of) the information content of the target act.

UsageNotes: A usage relationship only makes sense if the target act is authored and occurs independently of the source act. Otherwise a simpler relationship such as COMP would be appropriate.

Rationale: There is a need when defining a clinical trial protocol to indicate that the protocol makes use of other protocol or treatment specifications. This is stronger than the assertion of "references". References may exist without usage, and in a clinical trial protocol is common to assert both: what other specifications does this trial use and what other specifications does it merely reference.

  XCRPThttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipTypeExcerpts

The source is an excerpt from the target.

  XFRMhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActRelationshipTypetransformation

Used when the target Act is a transformation of the source Act. (For instance, used to show that a CDA document is a transformation of a DICOM SR document.)

Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:

Level A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. In this scheme, some codes are under other codes, and imply that the code they are under also applies
System The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere)
Code The code (used as the code in the resource instance)
Display The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application
Definition An explanation of the meaning of the concept
Comments Additional notes about how to use the code