HL7 FHIR® Implementation Guide: Breast Cancer Data, Release 1 - US Realm (Draft for Comment)
This page is part of the Breast Cancer Data Logical Models and FHIR Profiles (v0.1.0: STU 1 Draft) based on FHIR R3. . For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions 
{
"resourceType" : "StructureDefinition",
"id" : "cimi-statement-Members-model",
"text" : {
"status" : "generated",
"div" : "<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p><b>BC Members Logical Model</b></p>
<p>Members represent the elements of a group of a related but independent evaluations.
Examples are the measurements that compose a complete blood count (CBC), or the elements of a pathology report. Each member is an independent evaluation, but the grouping reflects a composite lab order, shared specimen, or a single report author. Typically the Category and Reason are not given for individual findings that are part of the panel, but rather given at the level of the panel itself. Although the proper place to define Members this might be in EvaluationResultTopic, it cannot be defined there because the value references EvaluationResultRecorded, which is a clinical statement class.
CIMI Alignment: CIMI V0.0.4 does not have this attribute and uses CompoundClinicalStatement to create panels. Compared to having a separate class, the current representation closer alignment with FHIR and greater flexibility (related observations can be added to any observation).</p>
</div>"
},
"url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/breastcancer/StructureDefinition/cimi-statement-Members-model",
"identifier" : [
{
"system" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/breastcancer",
"value" : "cimi.statement.Members"
}
],
"version" : "0.1.0",
"name" : "MembersModel",
"title" : "BC Members Logical Model",
"status" : "draft",
"date" : "2018-04-01T00:00:00+11:00",
"publisher" : "The HL7 Cancer Interoperability Group sponsored by Clinical Interoperability Council Work Group (CIC)",
"contact" : [
{
"telecom" : [
{
"system" : "url",
"value" : "http://standardhealthrecord.org"
}
]
}
],
"description" : "Members represent the elements of a group of a related but independent evaluations.
Examples are the measurements that compose a complete blood count (CBC), or the elements of a pathology report. Each member is an independent evaluation, but the grouping reflects a composite lab order, shared specimen, or a single report author. Typically the Category and Reason are not given for individual findings that are part of the panel, but rather given at the level of the panel itself. Although the proper place to define Members this might be in EvaluationResultTopic, it cannot be defined there because the value references EvaluationResultRecorded, which is a clinical statement class.
CIMI Alignment: CIMI V0.0.4 does not have this attribute and uses CompoundClinicalStatement to create panels. Compared to having a separate class, the current representation closer alignment with FHIR and greater flexibility (related observations can be added to any observation).",
"kind" : "logical",
"abstract" : false,
"type" : "cimi-statement-Members-model",
"baseDefinition" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Element",
"derivation" : "specialization",
"snapshot" : {
"element" : [
{
"id" : "cimi-statement-Members-model",
"path" : "cimi-statement-Members-model",
"definition" : "Members represent the elements of a group of a related but independent evaluations.
Examples are the measurements that compose a complete blood count (CBC), or the elements of a pathology report. Each member is an independent evaluation, but the grouping reflects a composite lab order, shared specimen, or a single report author. Typically the Category and Reason are not given for individual findings that are part of the panel, but rather given at the level of the panel itself. Although the proper place to define Members this might be in EvaluationResultTopic, it cannot be defined there because the value references EvaluationResultRecorded, which is a clinical statement class.
CIMI Alignment: CIMI V0.0.4 does not have this attribute and uses CompoundClinicalStatement to create panels. Compared to having a separate class, the current representation closer alignment with FHIR and greater flexibility (related observations can be added to any observation).",
"min" : 0,
"max" : "*",
"base" : {
"path" : "cimi-statement-Members-model",
"min" : 0,
"max" : "*"
},
"mustSupport" : false,
"isModifier" : false,
"isSummary" : false
},
{
"id" : "cimi-statement-Members-model.value",
"path" : "cimi-statement-Members-model.value",
"short" : "EvaluationResultRecorded representing members represent the elements of a group of a related but independent evaluations.",
"definition" : "EvaluationResultRecorded representing members represent the elements of a group of a related but independent evaluations.
Examples are the measurements that compose a complete blood count (CBC), or the elements of a pathology report. Each member is an independent evaluation, but the grouping reflects a composite lab order, shared specimen, or a single report author. Typically the Category and Reason are not given for individual findings that are part of the panel, but rather given at the level of the panel itself. Although the proper place to define Members this might be in EvaluationResultTopic, it cannot be defined there because the value references EvaluationResultRecorded, which is a clinical statement class.
CIMI Alignment: CIMI V0.0.4 does not have this attribute and uses CompoundClinicalStatement to create panels. Compared to having a separate class, the current representation closer alignment with FHIR and greater flexibility (related observations can be added to any observation).",
"alias" : [
"evaluationResultRecorded"
],
"min" : 0,
"max" : "*",
"base" : {
"path" : "cimi-statement-Members-model.value",
"min" : 0,
"max" : "*"
},
"type" : [
{
"code" : "Reference",
"targetProfile" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/breastcancer/StructureDefinition/cimi-statement-EvaluationResultRecorded-model"
}
],
"mustSupport" : false,
"isModifier" : false,
"isSummary" : false
}
]
},
"differential" : {
"element" : [
{
"id" : "cimi-statement-Members-model",
"path" : "cimi-statement-Members-model",
"definition" : "Members represent the elements of a group of a related but independent evaluations.
Examples are the measurements that compose a complete blood count (CBC), or the elements of a pathology report. Each member is an independent evaluation, but the grouping reflects a composite lab order, shared specimen, or a single report author. Typically the Category and Reason are not given for individual findings that are part of the panel, but rather given at the level of the panel itself. Although the proper place to define Members this might be in EvaluationResultTopic, it cannot be defined there because the value references EvaluationResultRecorded, which is a clinical statement class.
CIMI Alignment: CIMI V0.0.4 does not have this attribute and uses CompoundClinicalStatement to create panels. Compared to having a separate class, the current representation closer alignment with FHIR and greater flexibility (related observations can be added to any observation).",
"min" : 0,
"max" : "*",
"base" : {
"path" : "cimi-statement-Members-model",
"min" : 0,
"max" : "*"
},
"mustSupport" : false,
"isModifier" : false,
"isSummary" : false
},
{
"id" : "cimi-statement-Members-model.value",
"path" : "cimi-statement-Members-model.value",
"short" : "EvaluationResultRecorded representing members represent the elements of a group of a related but independent evaluations.",
"definition" : "EvaluationResultRecorded representing members represent the elements of a group of a related but independent evaluations.
Examples are the measurements that compose a complete blood count (CBC), or the elements of a pathology report. Each member is an independent evaluation, but the grouping reflects a composite lab order, shared specimen, or a single report author. Typically the Category and Reason are not given for individual findings that are part of the panel, but rather given at the level of the panel itself. Although the proper place to define Members this might be in EvaluationResultTopic, it cannot be defined there because the value references EvaluationResultRecorded, which is a clinical statement class.
CIMI Alignment: CIMI V0.0.4 does not have this attribute and uses CompoundClinicalStatement to create panels. Compared to having a separate class, the current representation closer alignment with FHIR and greater flexibility (related observations can be added to any observation).",
"alias" : [
"evaluationResultRecorded"
],
"min" : 0,
"max" : "*",
"base" : {
"path" : "cimi-statement-Members-model.value",
"min" : 0,
"max" : "*"
},
"type" : [
{
"code" : "Reference",
"targetProfile" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/us/breastcancer/StructureDefinition/cimi-statement-EvaluationResultRecorded-model"
}
],
"mustSupport" : false,
"isModifier" : false,
"isSummary" : false
}
]
}
}