Release 4B Ballot #1

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v4.1.0: Release 4B Ballot #1). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3

Careplan-example-obesity-narrative.ttl

Patient Care Work GroupMaturity Level: N/AStandards Status: InformativeCompartments: Encounter, Patient, Practitioner, RelatedPerson

Raw Turtle (+ also see Turtle/RDF Format Specification)

Primarily narrative care plan to address obesity

@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

# - resource -------------------------------------------------------------------

<http://hl7.org/fhir/CarePlan/obesity-narrative> a fhir:CarePlan;
  fhir:nodeRole fhir:treeRoot;
  fhir:Resource.id [ fhir:value "obesity-narrative"];
  fhir:DomainResource.text [
     fhir:Narrative.status [ fhir:value "additional" ];
     fhir:Narrative.div "<div xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\">\n      <p> Care plan to address obesity.  Goal is a target weight of 160 to 180 lbs.  Activities include diet and exercise.</p>\n    </div>"
  ];
  fhir:CarePlan.status [ fhir:value "active"];
  fhir:CarePlan.intent [ fhir:value "plan"];
  fhir:CarePlan.subject [
     fhir:link <http://hl7.org/fhir/Patient/example>;
     fhir:Reference.reference [ fhir:value "Patient/example" ];
     fhir:Reference.display [ fhir:value "Peter James Chalmers" ]
  ] .

<http://hl7.org/fhir/Patient/example> a fhir:Patient .

# - ontology header ------------------------------------------------------------

<http://hl7.org/fhir/CarePlan/obesity-narrative.ttl> a owl:Ontology;
  owl:imports fhir:fhir.ttl;
  owl:versionIRI <http://build.fhir.org/CarePlan/obesity-narrative.ttl> .

# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.