This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v5.0.0: R5 - STU). This is the current published version. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3
Riskassessment.shex
Raw ShEx
ShEx statement for riskassessment
PREFIX fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/>
PREFIX fhirvs: <http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/>
PREFIX xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>
PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
IMPORT <code.shex>
IMPORT <Group.shex>
IMPORT <Range.shex>
IMPORT <Period.shex>
IMPORT <Device.shex>
IMPORT <string.shex>
IMPORT <Patient.shex>
IMPORT <decimal.shex>
IMPORT <Resource.shex>
IMPORT <dateTime.shex>
IMPORT <Reference.shex>
IMPORT <Encounter.shex>
IMPORT <Condition.shex>
IMPORT <Identifier.shex>
IMPORT <Annotation.shex>
IMPORT <Practitioner.shex>
IMPORT <RelatedPerson.shex>
IMPORT <DomainResource.shex>
IMPORT <CodeableConcept.shex>
IMPORT <BackboneElement.shex>
IMPORT <PractitionerRole.shex>
IMPORT <CodeableReference.shex>
start=@<RiskAssessment> AND {fhir:nodeRole [fhir:treeRoot]}
# Potential outcomes for a subject with likelihood
<RiskAssessment> EXTENDS @<DomainResource> CLOSED {
a [fhir:RiskAssessment]?;
fhir:nodeRole [fhir:treeRoot]?;
fhir:identifier @<OneOrMore_Identifier>?; # Unique identifier for the
# assessment
fhir:basedOn @<Reference> AND {fhir:link
@<Resource> ? }?; # Request fulfilled by this
# assessment
fhir:parent @<Reference> AND {fhir:link
@<Resource> ? }?; # Part of this occurrence
fhir:status @<code> AND
{fhir:v @fhirvs:observation-status}; # registered | preliminary | final |
# amended +
fhir:method @<CodeableConcept>?; # Evaluation mechanism
fhir:code @<CodeableConcept>?; # Type of assessment
fhir:subject @<Reference> AND {fhir:link
@<Group> OR
@<Patient> ? }; # Who/what does assessment apply to?
fhir:encounter @<Reference> AND {fhir:link
@<Encounter> ? }?; # Where was assessment performed?
fhir:occurrence @<dateTime> OR
@<Period> ?; # When was assessment made?
fhir:condition @<Reference> AND {fhir:link
@<Condition> ? }?; # Condition assessed
fhir:performer @<Reference> AND {fhir:link
@<Device> OR
@<Patient> OR
@<Practitioner> OR
@<PractitionerRole> OR
@<RelatedPerson> ? }?; # Who did assessment?
fhir:reason @<OneOrMore_CodeableReference>?; # Why the assessment was necessary?
fhir:basis @<OneOrMore_Reference_Resource>?; # Information used in assessment
fhir:prediction @<OneOrMore_RiskAssessment.prediction>?; # Outcome predicted
fhir:mitigation @<string>?; # How to reduce risk
fhir:note @<OneOrMore_Annotation>?; # Comments on the risk assessment
}
# Outcome predicted
<RiskAssessment.prediction> EXTENDS @<BackboneElement> CLOSED {
fhir:outcome @<CodeableConcept>?; # Possible outcome for the subject
fhir:probability @<decimal> OR
@<Range> ?; # Likelihood of specified outcome
fhir:qualitativeRisk @<CodeableConcept>?; # Likelihood of specified outcome as
# a qualitative value
fhir:relativeRisk @<decimal>?; # Relative likelihood
fhir:when @<Period> OR
@<Range> ?; # Timeframe or age range
fhir:rationale @<string>?; # Explanation of prediction
}
#---------------------- Cardinality Types (OneOrMore) -------------------
<OneOrMore_Identifier> CLOSED {
rdf:first @<Identifier> ;
rdf:rest [rdf:nil] OR @<OneOrMore_Identifier>
}
<OneOrMore_CodeableReference> CLOSED {
rdf:first @<CodeableReference> ;
rdf:rest [rdf:nil] OR @<OneOrMore_CodeableReference>
}
<OneOrMore_Reference_Resource> CLOSED {
rdf:first @<Reference> AND {fhir:link
@<Resource> } ;
rdf:rest [rdf:nil] OR @<OneOrMore_Reference_Resource>
}
<OneOrMore_RiskAssessment.prediction> CLOSED {
rdf:first @<RiskAssessment.prediction> ;
rdf:rest [rdf:nil] OR @<OneOrMore_RiskAssessment.prediction>
}
<OneOrMore_Annotation> CLOSED {
rdf:first @<Annotation> ;
rdf:rest [rdf:nil] OR @<OneOrMore_Annotation>
}
#---------------------- Value Sets ------------------------
# Codes providing the status of an observation.
fhirvs:observation-status ["registered" "preliminary" "final" "amended" "corrected" "cancelled" "entered-in-error" "unknown"]
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the
ShEx files are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part
of the specification.