This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v4.0.1: R4 - Mixed Normative and STU) in it's permanent home (it will always be available at this URL). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3
Pharmacy Work Group | Maturity Level: N/A | Standards Status: Informative | Compartments: Device, Encounter, Patient, Practitioner, RelatedPerson |
This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML, JSON or Turtle format. This example conforms to the profile MedicationAdministration.
Generated Narrative with Details
id: medadmin0302
contained:
partOf: Procedure/biopsy
status: completed
category: Inpatient (Details : {http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/medication-admin-category code 'inpatient' = 'Inpatient', given as 'Inpatient'})
medication: id: med0317; Injection Solution (qualifier value) (Details : {SNOMED CT code '385219001' = 'Injection solution', given as 'Injection Solution (qualifier value)'})
subject: Donald Duck
context: encounter who leads to this prescription
effective: 15/01/2015 4:30:00 AM --> 15/01/2015 2:30:00 PM
- | Actor |
* | Patrick Pump |
reasonCode: Given as Ordered (Details : {http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/reason-medication-given code 'b' = 'Given as Ordered', given as 'Given as Ordered'})
request: MedicationRequest/medrx0322
- | Text | Site | Route | Method | Dose | Rate[x] |
* | KCl 20 mEq in 1 L 0.9%NS IV at 100 ml/hr | Structure of ligament of left superior vena cava (Details : {SNOMED CT code '6073002' = 'Ligament of left superior vena cava', given as 'Structure of ligament of left superior vena cava'}) | Intravenous route (qualifier value) (Details : {SNOMED CT code '47625008' = 'Intravenous route', given as 'Intravenous route (qualifier value)'}) | Continuous infusion (Details ) | 20 meq (Details: UCUM code meq = 'meq') | 100 mL (Details: UCUM code mL = 'mL')/1 h (Details: UCUM code h = 'h') |
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.