Extensions for Using Data Elements from FHIR R5 in FHIR R4B
0.1.0 - STU International flag

Extensions for Using Data Elements from FHIR R5 in FHIR R4B - Downloaded Version null See the Directory of published versions

ValueSet: R5V3SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationTypeForR4B

Official URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/xver/ValueSet/R5-v3-SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationType-for-R4B Version: 0.1.0
Standards status: Trial-use Maturity Level: 0 Computable Name: R5V3SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationTypeForR4B

This cross-version ValueSet represents content from http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationType|2.0.0 for use in FHIR R4B.

This value set is part of the cross-version definitions generated to enable use of the value set http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationType|2.0.0 as defined in FHIR R5 in FHIR R4B.

The source value set is bound to the following FHIR R5 elements:

Note that all concepts are included in this cross-version definition because no concepts have compatible representations

Following are the generation technical comments:

FHIR ValueSet http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationType|2.0.0, defined in FHIR R5 does not have any mapping to FHIR R4B

References

This value set is not used here; it may be used elsewhere (e.g. specifications and/or implementations that use this content)

Logical Definition (CLD)

  • Include these codes as defined in http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode version 📍8.0.0
    CodeDisplayDefinition
    SECINTCONOBSsecurity integrity confidence observationType of security metadata observation made about the integrity confidence of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which may be used to make access control decisions.

    **Examples:** Types of security integrity confidence observation metadata, which may value the observation, include highly reliable, uncertain reliability, and not reliable.

    *Usage Note:* A security integrity confidence observation on an Act may indicate that a valued Act.uncertaintycode attribute has been overridden by the entity responsible for ascribing the SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationValue. This supports the business requirements for increasing or decreasing the assessment of the reliability or trustworthiness of an IT resource based on parameters beyond the original assignment of an Act statement level of uncertainty.

 

Expansion

This value set expansion contains 1 concepts.

SystemVersionCodeDisplayDefinitionJSONXML
http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode8.0.0  SECINTCONOBSsecurity integrity confidence observation

Type of security metadata observation made about the integrity confidence of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which may be used to make access control decisions.

Examples: Types of security integrity confidence observation metadata, which may value the observation, include highly reliable, uncertain reliability, and not reliable.

Usage Note: A security integrity confidence observation on an Act may indicate that a valued Act.uncertaintycode attribute has been overridden by the entity responsible for ascribing the SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationValue. This supports the business requirements for increasing or decreasing the assessment of the reliability or trustworthiness of an IT resource based on parameters beyond the original assignment of an Act statement level of uncertainty.

Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:

Level A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. In this scheme, some codes are under other codes, and imply that the code they are under also applies
System The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere)
Code The code (used as the code in the resource instance)
Display The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application
Definition An explanation of the meaning of the concept
Comments Additional notes about how to use the code