<status value="active"/> <experimental value="false"/> <date value="2026-03-17T21:02:03.8104715+00:00"/> <publisher value="FHIR Infrastructure"/> <contact> <name value="FHIR Infrastructure"/> <telecom> <system value="url"/> <value value="http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/fiwg"/> </telecom> </contact> <description value="This cross-version ValueSet represents content from `http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationType|2.0.0` for use in FHIR R4."/> <jurisdiction> <coding> <system value="http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm"/> <code value="001"/> <display value="World"/> </coding> </jurisdiction> <purpose value="This value set is part of the cross-version definitions generated to enable use of the value set `http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationType|2.0.0` as defined in FHIR R5 in FHIR R4. The source value set is bound to the following FHIR R5 elements: * Note that all concepts are included in this cross-version definition because no concepts have compatible representations Following are the generation technical comments: FHIR ValueSet `http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationType|2.0.0`, defined in FHIR R5 does not have any mapping to FHIR R4"/> <compose> <include> <system value="http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode"/> <version value="8.0.0"/> <concept> <code value="SECINTCONOBS"/> <display value="security integrity confidence observation"/> </concept> </include> </compose> <expansion> <timestamp value="2026-03-17T21:02:03.8104715+00:00"/> <contains> <system value="http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode"/> <version value="8.0.0"/> <code value="SECINTCONOBS"/> <display value="security integrity confidence observation"/> </contains> </expansion> </ValueSet>

Generated Narrative: ValueSet R5-v3-SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationType-for-R4

This value set expansion contains 1 concepts.

System	Version	Code	Display	Definition
`http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode`	8.0.0	SECINTCONOBS	security integrity confidence observation	Type of security metadata observation made about the integrity confidence of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which may be used to make access control decisions. Examples: Types of security integrity confidence observation metadata, which may value the observation, include highly reliable, uncertain reliability, and not reliable. Usage Note: A security integrity confidence observation on an Act may indicate that a valued Act.uncertaintycode attribute has been overridden by the entity responsible for ascribing the SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationValue. This supports the business requirements for increasing or decreasing the assessment of the reliability or trustworthiness of an IT resource based on parameters beyond the original assignment of an Act statement level of uncertainty.