This resource allows for the definition of various types of plans as a sharable, consumable, and executable artifact. The resource is general enough to support the description of a broad range of clinical artifacts such as clinical decision support rules, order sets and protocols.

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

An Extension

R5: PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x] (new:Coding, string)

Element PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x] has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x] has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). An externally-defined extension that has been mapped as the representation of FHIR R5 element PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x]: http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/artifact-versionAlgorithm. If set as a string, this is a FHIRPath expression that has two additional context variables passed in - %version1 and %version2 and will return a negative number if version1 is newer, a positive number if version2 and a 0 if the version ordering can't be successfully be determined.

R5: PlanDefinition.subject[x] additional types (canonical(http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/EvidenceVariable))

Element PlanDefinition.subject[x] is mapped to FHIR R4 element PlanDefinition.subject[x] as SourceIsBroaderThanTarget. The mappings for PlanDefinition.subject[x] do not cover the following types: canonical. The target context PlanDefinition.subject[x] is a choice-type element and cannot directly hold extensions. The context is moved up to parent element PlanDefinition. The standard extension alternate-reference has been mapped as PART of the representation of FHIR R5 element PlanDefinition.subject[x] with unmapped reference targets: AdministrableProductDefinition, ManufacturedItemDefinition, MedicinalProductDefinition, PackagedProductDefinition, SubstanceDefinition. Source element PlanDefinition.subject[x] has unmapped reference types. While the target element PlanDefinition.subject[x] is a choice type and does not allow extensions, the alternate-reference extension can be applied to Reference values within it. Note that the choice of canonical for the subject element was introduced in R4B to support pharmaceutical quality use cases. To ensure as much backwards-compatibility as possible, it is recommended to only use the new canonical type with these use cases.

R5: PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). An externally-defined extension that has been mapped as the representation of FHIR R5 element PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel: http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/artifact-copyrightLabel. The (c) symbol should NOT be included in this string. It will be added by software when rendering the notation. Full details about licensing, restrictions, warrantees, etc. goes in the more general 'copyright' element.

R5: PlanDefinition.actor (new:BackboneElement)

Element PlanDefinition.actor has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.actor has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.asNeeded[x] (new:boolean, CodeableConcept)

Element PlanDefinition.asNeeded[x] has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.asNeeded[x] has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

The status of this plan definition. Enables tracking the life-cycle of the content.

Allows filtering of plan definitions that are appropriate for use versus not.

The lifecycle status of an artifact.

R5: PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x] (new:Coding, string)

Element PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x] has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x] has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). An externally-defined extension that has been mapped as the representation of FHIR R5 element PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x]: http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/artifact-versionAlgorithm. If set as a string, this is a FHIRPath expression that has two additional context variables passed in - %version1 and %version2 and will return a negative number if version1 is newer, a positive number if version2 and a 0 if the version ordering can't be successfully be determined.

R5: PlanDefinition.subject[x] additional types (canonical(http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/EvidenceVariable))

Element PlanDefinition.subject[x] is mapped to FHIR R4 element PlanDefinition.subject[x] as SourceIsBroaderThanTarget. The mappings for PlanDefinition.subject[x] do not cover the following types: canonical. The target context PlanDefinition.subject[x] is a choice-type element and cannot directly hold extensions. The context is moved up to parent element PlanDefinition. The standard extension alternate-reference has been mapped as PART of the representation of FHIR R5 element PlanDefinition.subject[x] with unmapped reference targets: AdministrableProductDefinition, ManufacturedItemDefinition, MedicinalProductDefinition, PackagedProductDefinition, SubstanceDefinition. Source element PlanDefinition.subject[x] has unmapped reference types. While the target element PlanDefinition.subject[x] is a choice type and does not allow extensions, the alternate-reference extension can be applied to Reference values within it. Note that the choice of canonical for the subject element was introduced in R4B to support pharmaceutical quality use cases. To ensure as much backwards-compatibility as possible, it is recommended to only use the new canonical type with these use cases.

R5: PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). An externally-defined extension that has been mapped as the representation of FHIR R5 element PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel: http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/artifact-copyrightLabel. The (c) symbol should NOT be included in this string. It will be added by software when rendering the notation. Full details about licensing, restrictions, warrantees, etc. goes in the more general 'copyright' element.

R5: PlanDefinition.actor (new:BackboneElement)

Element PlanDefinition.actor has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.actor has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.asNeeded[x] (new:boolean, CodeableConcept)

Element PlanDefinition.asNeeded[x] has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.asNeeded[x] has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.subject[x] additional types (canonical(http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/EvidenceVariable))

Element PlanDefinition.subject[x] is mapped to FHIR R4 element PlanDefinition.subject[x] as SourceIsBroaderThanTarget. The mappings for PlanDefinition.subject[x] do not cover the following types: canonical. The target context PlanDefinition.subject[x] is a choice-type element and cannot directly hold extensions. The context is moved up to parent element PlanDefinition. The standard extension alternate-reference has been mapped as PART of the representation of FHIR R5 element PlanDefinition.subject[x] with unmapped reference targets: AdministrableProductDefinition, ManufacturedItemDefinition, MedicinalProductDefinition, PackagedProductDefinition, SubstanceDefinition. Source element PlanDefinition.subject[x] has unmapped reference types. While the target element PlanDefinition.subject[x] is a choice type and does not allow extensions, the alternate-reference extension can be applied to Reference values within it. Note that the choice of canonical for the subject element was introduced in R4B to support pharmaceutical quality use cases. To ensure as much backwards-compatibility as possible, it is recommended to only use the new canonical type with these use cases.

R5: PlanDefinition.goal.target.detail[x] additional types (string, boolean, integer, Ratio)

Element PlanDefinition.goal.target.detail[x] is mapped to FHIR R4 element PlanDefinition.goal.target.detail[x] as SourceIsBroaderThanTarget. The mappings for PlanDefinition.goal.target.detail[x] do not cover the following types: boolean, integer, Ratio, string. The target context PlanDefinition.goal.target.detail[x] is a choice-type element and cannot directly hold extensions. The context is moved up to parent element PlanDefinition.goal.target. A CodeableConcept with just a text would be used instead of a string if the field was usually coded, or if the type associated with the goal.target.measure defines a coded value.

R5: PlanDefinition.action.linkId (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.action.linkId has a context of PlanDefinition.action based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.linkId has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.subject[x] additional types (canonical)

Element PlanDefinition.action.subject[x] is mapped to FHIR R4 element PlanDefinition.action.subject[x] as SourceIsBroaderThanTarget. The mappings for PlanDefinition.action.subject[x] do not cover the following types: canonical. The target context PlanDefinition.action.subject[x] is a choice-type element and cannot directly hold extensions. The context is moved up to parent element PlanDefinition.action. The subject of an action overrides the subject at a parent action or on the root of the PlanDefinition if specified.

In addition, because the subject needs to be resolved during realization, use of subjects in actions (or in the ActivityDefinition referenced by the action) resolves based on the set of subjects supplied in context and by type (i.e. the patient subject would resolve to a resource of type Patient).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.location (new:CodeableReference(Location))

Element PlanDefinition.action.location has a context of PlanDefinition.action based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.location has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). May reference a specific clinical location or may just identify a type of location.

R5: PlanDefinition.action.input.title (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.action.input.title has a context of PlanDefinition.action.input based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.input.title has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.input.requirement (new:DataRequirement)

Element PlanDefinition.action.input.requirement has a context of PlanDefinition.action.input based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.input.requirement has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.input.relatedData (new:id)

Element PlanDefinition.action.input.relatedData has a context of PlanDefinition.action.input based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.input.relatedData has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). The relatedData element allows indicating that an input to a parent action is an input to specific child actions. It also allows the output of one action to be identified as the input to a different action

R5: PlanDefinition.action.output.title (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.action.output.title has a context of PlanDefinition.action.output based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.output.title has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.output.requirement (new:DataRequirement)

Element PlanDefinition.action.output.requirement has a context of PlanDefinition.action.output based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.output.requirement has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.output.relatedData (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.action.output.relatedData has a context of PlanDefinition.action.output based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.output.relatedData has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). The relatedData element allows indicating that the output of child action is also the output of a parent action. It also allows the input of one action to be identified as the output of a different action

R5: PlanDefinition.action.participant.actorId (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.action.participant.actorId has a context of PlanDefinition.action.participant based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.participant.actorId has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.participant.typeCanonical (new:canonical(CapabilityStatement))

Element PlanDefinition.action.participant.typeCanonical has a context of PlanDefinition.action.participant based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.participant.typeCanonical has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.participant.typeReference (new:Reference(CareTeam,Device,DeviceDefinition,Endpoint,Group,HealthcareService,Location,Organization,Patient,Practitioner,PractitionerRole,RelatedPerson))

Element PlanDefinition.action.participant.typeReference has a context of PlanDefinition.action.participant based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.participant.typeReference has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). When this element is a reference, it SHOULD be a reference to a definitional resource (for example, a location type, rather than a specific location).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.participant.function (new:CodeableConcept)

Element PlanDefinition.action.participant.function has a context of PlanDefinition.action.participant based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.participant.function has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.participant.type

Element PlanDefinition.action.participant.type is mapped to FHIR R4 element PlanDefinition.action.participant.type as SourceIsBroaderThanTarget.

This resource allows for the definition of various types of plans as a sharable, consumable, and executable artifact. The resource is general enough to support the description of a broad range of clinical artifacts such as clinical decision support rules, order sets and protocols.

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation.

The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

The base language in which the resource is written.

Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).

The codes SHOULD be taken from CommonLanguages
(preferred to http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/languages|4.0.1)

A human language.

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.

These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.

This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.

An Extension

R5: PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x] (new:Coding, string)

Element PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x] has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x] has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). An externally-defined extension that has been mapped as the representation of FHIR R5 element PlanDefinition.versionAlgorithm[x]: http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/artifact-versionAlgorithm. If set as a string, this is a FHIRPath expression that has two additional context variables passed in - %version1 and %version2 and will return a negative number if version1 is newer, a positive number if version2 and a 0 if the version ordering can't be successfully be determined.

R5: PlanDefinition.subject[x] additional types (canonical(http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/EvidenceVariable))

Element PlanDefinition.subject[x] is mapped to FHIR R4 element PlanDefinition.subject[x] as SourceIsBroaderThanTarget. The mappings for PlanDefinition.subject[x] do not cover the following types: canonical. The target context PlanDefinition.subject[x] is a choice-type element and cannot directly hold extensions. The context is moved up to parent element PlanDefinition. The standard extension alternate-reference has been mapped as PART of the representation of FHIR R5 element PlanDefinition.subject[x] with unmapped reference targets: AdministrableProductDefinition, ManufacturedItemDefinition, MedicinalProductDefinition, PackagedProductDefinition, SubstanceDefinition. Source element PlanDefinition.subject[x] has unmapped reference types. While the target element PlanDefinition.subject[x] is a choice type and does not allow extensions, the alternate-reference extension can be applied to Reference values within it. Note that the choice of canonical for the subject element was introduced in R4B to support pharmaceutical quality use cases. To ensure as much backwards-compatibility as possible, it is recommended to only use the new canonical type with these use cases.

R5: PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). An externally-defined extension that has been mapped as the representation of FHIR R5 element PlanDefinition.copyrightLabel: http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/artifact-copyrightLabel. The (c) symbol should NOT be included in this string. It will be added by software when rendering the notation. Full details about licensing, restrictions, warrantees, etc. goes in the more general 'copyright' element.

R5: PlanDefinition.actor (new:BackboneElement)

Element PlanDefinition.actor has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.actor has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.asNeeded[x] (new:boolean, CodeableConcept)

Element PlanDefinition.asNeeded[x] has a context of PlanDefinition based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.asNeeded[x] has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

An absolute URI that is used to identify this plan definition when it is referenced in a specification, model, design or an instance; also called its canonical identifier. This SHOULD be globally unique and SHOULD be a literal address at which at which an authoritative instance of this plan definition is (or will be) published. This URL can be the target of a canonical reference. It SHALL remain the same when the plan definition is stored on different servers.

Can be a urn:uuid: or a urn:oid: but real http: addresses are preferred. Multiple instances may share the same URL if they have a distinct version.

The determination of when to create a new version of a resource (same url, new version) vs. defining a new artifact is up to the author. Considerations for making this decision are found in Technical and Business Versions.

In some cases, the resource can no longer be found at the stated url, but the url itself cannot change. Implementations can use the meta.source element to indicate where the current master source of the resource can be found.

Allows the plan definition to be referenced by a single globally unique identifier.

A formal identifier that is used to identify this plan definition when it is represented in other formats, or referenced in a specification, model, design or an instance.

Typically, this is used for identifiers that can go in an HL7 V3 II (instance identifier) data type, and can then identify this plan definition outside of FHIR, where it is not possible to use the logical URI.

Allows externally provided and/or usable business identifiers to be easily associated with the module.

The identifier that is used to identify this version of the plan definition when it is referenced in a specification, model, design or instance. This is an arbitrary value managed by the plan definition author and is not expected to be globally unique. For example, it might be a timestamp (e.g. yyyymmdd) if a managed version is not available. There is also no expectation that versions can be placed in a lexicographical sequence. To provide a version consistent with the Decision Support Service specification, use the format Major.Minor.Revision (e.g. 1.0.0). For more information on versioning knowledge assets, refer to the Decision Support Service specification. Note that a version is required for non-experimental active artifacts.

There may be different plan definition instances that have the same identifier but different versions. The version can be appended to the url in a reference to allow a reference to a particular business version of the plan definition with the format [url]|[version].

A natural language name identifying the plan definition. This name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation.

The name is not expected to be globally unique. The name should be a simple alphanumeric type name to ensure that it is machine-processing friendly.

Support human navigation and code generation.

A short, descriptive, user-friendly title for the plan definition.

This name does not need to be machine-processing friendly and may contain punctuation, white-space, etc.

An explanatory or alternate title for the plan definition giving additional information about its content.

A high-level category for the plan definition that distinguishes the kinds of systems that would be interested in the plan definition.

The type of PlanDefinition.

The status of this plan definition. Enables tracking the life-cycle of the content.

Allows filtering of plan definitions that are appropriate for use versus not.

The lifecycle status of an artifact.

A Boolean value to indicate that this plan definition is authored for testing purposes (or education/evaluation/marketing) and is not intended to be used for genuine usage.

Allows filtering of plan definitions that are appropriate for use versus not.

Enables experimental content to be developed following the same lifecycle that would be used for a production-level plan definition.

A code or group definition that describes the intended subject of the plan definition.

The possible types of subjects for a plan definition (E.g. Patient, Practitioner, Organization, Location, etc.).

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

R5: PlanDefinition.subject[x] additional types (canonical(http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/EvidenceVariable))

Element PlanDefinition.subject[x] is mapped to FHIR R4 element PlanDefinition.subject[x] as SourceIsBroaderThanTarget. The mappings for PlanDefinition.subject[x] do not cover the following types: canonical. The target context PlanDefinition.subject[x] is a choice-type element and cannot directly hold extensions. The context is moved up to parent element PlanDefinition. The standard extension alternate-reference has been mapped as PART of the representation of FHIR R5 element PlanDefinition.subject[x] with unmapped reference targets: AdministrableProductDefinition, ManufacturedItemDefinition, MedicinalProductDefinition, PackagedProductDefinition, SubstanceDefinition. Source element PlanDefinition.subject[x] has unmapped reference types. While the target element PlanDefinition.subject[x] is a choice type and does not allow extensions, the alternate-reference extension can be applied to Reference values within it. Note that the choice of canonical for the subject element was introduced in R4B to support pharmaceutical quality use cases. To ensure as much backwards-compatibility as possible, it is recommended to only use the new canonical type with these use cases.

The date (and optionally time) when the plan definition was published. The date must change when the business version changes and it must change if the status code changes. In addition, it should change when the substantive content of the plan definition changes.

Note that this is not the same as the resource last-modified-date, since the resource may be a secondary representation of the plan definition. Additional specific dates may be added as extensions or be found by consulting Provenances associated with past versions of the resource.

The name of the organization or individual that published the plan definition.

Usually an organization but may be an individual. The publisher (or steward) of the plan definition is the organization or individual primarily responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the plan definition. This is not necessarily the same individual or organization that developed and initially authored the content. The publisher is the primary point of contact for questions or issues with the plan definition. This item SHOULD be populated unless the information is available from context.

Helps establish the "authority/credibility" of the plan definition. May also allow for contact.

Contact details to assist a user in finding and communicating with the publisher.

May be a web site, an email address, a telephone number, etc.

A free text natural language description of the plan definition from a consumer's perspective.

This description can be used to capture details such as why the plan definition was built, comments about misuse, instructions for clinical use and interpretation, literature references, examples from the paper world, etc. It is not a rendering of the plan definition as conveyed in the 'text' field of the resource itself. This item SHOULD be populated unless the information is available from context (e.g. the language of the plan definition is presumed to be the predominant language in the place the plan definition was created).

The content was developed with a focus and intent of supporting the contexts that are listed. These contexts may be general categories (gender, age, ...) or may be references to specific programs (insurance plans, studies, ...) and may be used to assist with indexing and searching for appropriate plan definition instances.

When multiple useContexts are specified, there is no expectation that all or any of the contexts apply.

Assist in searching for appropriate content.

A legal or geographic region in which the plan definition is intended to be used.

It may be possible for the plan definition to be used in jurisdictions other than those for which it was originally designed or intended.

Countries and regions within which this artifact is targeted for use.

Explanation of why this plan definition is needed and why it has been designed as it has.

This element does not describe the usage of the plan definition. Instead, it provides traceability of ''why'' the resource is either needed or ''why'' it is defined as it is. This may be used to point to source materials or specifications that drove the structure of this plan definition.

A detailed description of how the plan definition is used from a clinical perspective.

A copyright statement relating to the plan definition and/or its contents. Copyright statements are generally legal restrictions on the use and publishing of the plan definition.

Consumers must be able to determine any legal restrictions on the use of the plan definition and/or its content.

The date on which the resource content was approved by the publisher. Approval happens once when the content is officially approved for usage.

The 'date' element may be more recent than the approval date because of minor changes or editorial corrections.

The date on which the resource content was last reviewed. Review happens periodically after approval but does not change the original approval date.

If specified, this date follows the original approval date.

Gives a sense of how "current" the content is. Resources that have not been reviewed in a long time may have a risk of being less appropriate/relevant.

The period during which the plan definition content was or is planned to be in active use.

The effective period for a plan definition determines when the content is applicable for usage and is independent of publication and review dates. For example, a measure intended to be used for the year 2016 might be published in 2015.

Allows establishing a transition before a resource comes into effect and also allows for a sunsetting process when new versions of the plan definition are or are expected to be used instead.

Descriptive topics related to the content of the plan definition. Topics provide a high-level categorization of the definition that can be useful for filtering and searching.

High-level categorization of the definition, used for searching, sorting, and filtering.

Repositories must be able to determine how to categorize the plan definition so that it can be found by topical searches.

An individiual or organization primarily involved in the creation and maintenance of the content.

An individual or organization primarily responsible for internal coherence of the content.

An individual or organization primarily responsible for review of some aspect of the content.

An individual or organization responsible for officially endorsing the content for use in some setting.

Related artifacts such as additional documentation, justification, or bibliographic references.

Each related artifact is either an attachment, or a reference to another resource, but not both.

Plan definitions must be able to provide enough information for consumers of the content (and/or interventions or results produced by the content) to be able to determine and understand the justification for and evidence in support of the content.

A reference to a Library resource containing any formal logic used by the plan definition.

Goals that describe what the activities within the plan are intended to achieve. For example, weight loss, restoring an activity of daily living, obtaining herd immunity via immunization, meeting a process improvement objective, etc.

Goal information needs to be captured for order sets, protocols, and care plan definitions to better describe the objectives of the protocol activities and to guide the creation of specific goals within the derived care plans and orders.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

Indicates a category the goal falls within.

Example codes for grouping goals for filtering or presentation.

Human-readable and/or coded description of a specific desired objective of care, such as "control blood pressure" or "negotiate an obstacle course" or "dance with child at wedding".

If no code is available, use CodeableConcept.text.

Describes goals that can be achieved.

Identifies the expected level of importance associated with reaching/sustaining the defined goal.

Indicates the level of importance associated with reaching or sustaining a goal.

The event after which the goal should begin being pursued.

Identifies the types of events that might trigger the start of a goal.

Identifies problems, conditions, issues, or concerns the goal is intended to address.

Identifies problems, conditions, issues, or concerns that goals may address.

Didactic or other informational resources associated with the goal that provide further supporting information about the goal. Information resources can include inline text commentary and links to web resources.

Indicates what should be done and within what timeframe.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

An Extension

R5: PlanDefinition.goal.target.detail[x] additional types (string, boolean, integer, Ratio)

Element PlanDefinition.goal.target.detail[x] is mapped to FHIR R4 element PlanDefinition.goal.target.detail[x] as SourceIsBroaderThanTarget. The mappings for PlanDefinition.goal.target.detail[x] do not cover the following types: boolean, integer, Ratio, string. The target context PlanDefinition.goal.target.detail[x] is a choice-type element and cannot directly hold extensions. The context is moved up to parent element PlanDefinition.goal.target. A CodeableConcept with just a text would be used instead of a string if the field was usually coded, or if the type associated with the goal.target.measure defines a coded value.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

The parameter whose value is to be tracked, e.g. body weight, blood pressure, or hemoglobin A1c level.

Identifies types of parameters that can be tracked to determine goal achievement.

The target value of the measure to be achieved to signify fulfillment of the goal, e.g. 150 pounds or 7.0%. Either the high or low or both values of the range can be specified. When a low value is missing, it indicates that the goal is achieved at any value at or below the high value. Similarly, if the high value is missing, it indicates that the goal is achieved at any value at or above the low value.

Indicates the timeframe after the start of the goal in which the goal should be met.

An action or group of actions to be taken as part of the plan.

Note that there is overlap between many of the elements defined here and the ActivityDefinition resource. When an ActivityDefinition is referenced (using the definition element), the overlapping elements in the plan override the content of the referenced ActivityDefinition unless otherwise documented in the specific elements. See the PlanDefinition resource for more detailed information.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

An Extension

R5: PlanDefinition.action.linkId (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.action.linkId has a context of PlanDefinition.action based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.linkId has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.subject[x] additional types (canonical)

Element PlanDefinition.action.subject[x] is mapped to FHIR R4 element PlanDefinition.action.subject[x] as SourceIsBroaderThanTarget. The mappings for PlanDefinition.action.subject[x] do not cover the following types: canonical. The target context PlanDefinition.action.subject[x] is a choice-type element and cannot directly hold extensions. The context is moved up to parent element PlanDefinition.action. The subject of an action overrides the subject at a parent action or on the root of the PlanDefinition if specified.

In addition, because the subject needs to be resolved during realization, use of subjects in actions (or in the ActivityDefinition referenced by the action) resolves based on the set of subjects supplied in context and by type (i.e. the patient subject would resolve to a resource of type Patient).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.location (new:CodeableReference(Location))

Element PlanDefinition.action.location has a context of PlanDefinition.action based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.location has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). May reference a specific clinical location or may just identify a type of location.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

A user-visible prefix for the action.

The title of the action displayed to a user.

A brief description of the action used to provide a summary to display to the user.

A text equivalent of the action to be performed. This provides a human-interpretable description of the action when the definition is consumed by a system that might not be capable of interpreting it dynamically.

Indicates how quickly the action should be addressed with respect to other actions.

Identifies the level of importance to be assigned to actioning the request.

A code that provides meaning for the action or action group. For example, a section may have a LOINC code for the section of a documentation template.

A description of why this action is necessary or appropriate.

This is different than the clinical evidence documentation, it's an actual business description of the reason for performing the action.

Didactic or other informational resources associated with the action that can be provided to the CDS recipient. Information resources can include inline text commentary and links to web resources.

Identifies goals that this action supports. The reference must be to a goal element defined within this plan definition.

A code or group definition that describes the intended subject of the action and its children, if any.

The subject of an action overrides the subject at a parent action or on the root of the PlanDefinition if specified.

In addition, because the subject needs to be resolved during realization, use of subjects in actions (or in the ActivityDefinition referenced by the action) resolves based on the set of subjects supplied in context and by type (i.e. the patient subject would resolve to a resource of type Patient).

The possible types of subjects for a plan definition (E.g. Patient, Practitioner, Organization, Location, etc.).

Multiple steps in a protocol often have different groups of steps that are focused on testing different things. The subject of an action specifies the focus of the action and any child actions.

A description of when the action should be triggered.

An expression that describes applicability criteria or start/stop conditions for the action.

When multiple conditions of the same kind are present, the effects are combined using AND semantics, so the overall condition is true only if all the conditions are true.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

The kind of condition.

Applicability criteria are used to determine immediate applicability when a plan definition is applied to a given context. Start and stop criteria are carried through application and used to describe enter/exit criteria for an action.

Defines the kinds of conditions that can appear on actions.

An expression that returns true or false, indicating whether the condition is satisfied.

The expression may be inlined or may be a reference to a named expression within a logic library referenced by the library element.

Defines input data requirements for the action.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

An Extension

R5: PlanDefinition.action.input.title (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.action.input.title has a context of PlanDefinition.action.input based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.input.title has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.input.requirement (new:DataRequirement)

Element PlanDefinition.action.input.requirement has a context of PlanDefinition.action.input based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.input.requirement has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.input.relatedData (new:id)

Element PlanDefinition.action.input.relatedData has a context of PlanDefinition.action.input based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.input.relatedData has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). The relatedData element allows indicating that an input to a parent action is an input to specific child actions. It also allows the output of one action to be identified as the input to a different action

The type of the required data, specified as the type name of a resource. For profiles, this value is set to the type of the base resource of the profile.

A list of all the concrete types defined in this version of the FHIR specification - Abstract Types, Data Types and Resource Types.

The profile of the required data, specified as the uri of the profile definition.

The intended subjects of the data requirement. If this element is not provided, a Patient subject is assumed.

The subject of a data requirement is critical, as the data being specified is determined with respect to a particular subject. This corresponds roughly to the notion of a Compartment in that it limits what data is available based on its relationship to the subject. In CQL, this corresponds to the context declaration.

The possible types of subjects for a data requirement (E.g., Patient, Practitioner, Organization, Location, etc.).

Indicates that specific elements of the type are referenced by the knowledge module and must be supported by the consumer in order to obtain an effective evaluation. This does not mean that a value is required for this element, only that the consuming system must understand the element and be able to provide values for it if they are available.

The value of mustSupport SHALL be a FHIRPath resolveable on the type of the DataRequirement. The path SHALL consist only of identifiers, constant indexers, and .resolve() (see the Simple FHIRPath Profile for full details).

Code filters specify additional constraints on the data, specifying the value set of interest for a particular element of the data. Each code filter defines an additional constraint on the data, i.e. code filters are AND'ed, not OR'ed.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The code-valued attribute of the filter. The specified path SHALL be a FHIRPath resolveable on the specified type of the DataRequirement, and SHALL consist only of identifiers, constant indexers, and .resolve(). The path is allowed to contain qualifiers (.) to traverse sub-elements, as well as indexers ([x]) to traverse multiple-cardinality sub-elements (see the Simple FHIRPath Profile for full details). Note that the index must be an integer constant. The path must resolve to an element of type code, Coding, or CodeableConcept.

The path attribute contains a Simple FHIRPath Subset that allows path traversal, but not calculation.

A token parameter that refers to a search parameter defined on the specified type of the DataRequirement, and which searches on elements of type code, Coding, or CodeableConcept.

The valueset for the code filter. The valueSet and code elements are additive. If valueSet is specified, the filter will return only those data items for which the value of the code-valued element specified in the path is a member of the specified valueset.

The codes for the code filter. If values are given, the filter will return only those data items for which the code-valued attribute specified by the path has a value that is one of the specified codes. If codes are specified in addition to a value set, the filter returns items matching a code in the value set or one of the specified codes.

Date filters specify additional constraints on the data in terms of the applicable date range for specific elements. Each date filter specifies an additional constraint on the data, i.e. date filters are AND'ed, not OR'ed.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The date-valued attribute of the filter. The specified path SHALL be a FHIRPath resolveable on the specified type of the DataRequirement, and SHALL consist only of identifiers, constant indexers, and .resolve(). The path is allowed to contain qualifiers (.) to traverse sub-elements, as well as indexers ([x]) to traverse multiple-cardinality sub-elements (see the Simple FHIRPath Profile for full details). Note that the index must be an integer constant. The path must resolve to an element of type date, dateTime, Period, Schedule, or Timing.

The path attribute contains a Simple FHIR Subset that allows path traversal, but not calculation.

A date parameter that refers to a search parameter defined on the specified type of the DataRequirement, and which searches on elements of type date, dateTime, Period, Schedule, or Timing.

The value of the filter. If period is specified, the filter will return only those data items that fall within the bounds determined by the Period, inclusive of the period boundaries. If dateTime is specified, the filter will return only those data items that are equal to the specified dateTime. If a Duration is specified, the filter will return only those data items that fall within Duration before now.

Specifies a maximum number of results that are required (uses the _count search parameter).

This element can be used in combination with the sort element to specify quota requirements such as "the most recent 5" or "the highest 5".

Enables the requirement "most recent 5 results" to be expressed.

Specifies the order of the results to be returned.

This element can be used in combination with the sort element to specify quota requirements such as "the most recent 5" or "the highest 5". When multiple sorts are specified, they are applied in the order they appear in the resource.

Enables the requirement "most recent 5 results" to be expressed.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The attribute of the sort. The specified path must be resolvable from the type of the required data. The path is allowed to contain qualifiers (.) to traverse sub-elements, as well as indexers ([x]) to traverse multiple-cardinality sub-elements. Note that the index must be an integer constant.

The direction of the sort, ascending or descending.

The possible sort directions, ascending or descending.

Defines the outputs of the action, if any.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

An Extension

R5: PlanDefinition.action.output.title (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.action.output.title has a context of PlanDefinition.action.output based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.output.title has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.output.requirement (new:DataRequirement)

Element PlanDefinition.action.output.requirement has a context of PlanDefinition.action.output based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.output.requirement has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).

R5: PlanDefinition.action.output.relatedData (new:string)

Element PlanDefinition.action.output.relatedData has a context of PlanDefinition.action.output based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to PlanDefinition. Element PlanDefinition.action.output.relatedData has no mapping targets in FHIR R4. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element). The relatedData element allows indicating that the output of child action is also the output of a parent action. It also allows the input of one action to be identified as the output of a different action

The type of the required data, specified as the type name of a resource. For profiles, this value is set to the type of the base resource of the profile.

A list of all the concrete types defined in this version of the FHIR specification - Abstract Types, Data Types and Resource Types.

The profile of the required data, specified as the uri of the profile definition.

The intended subjects of the data requirement. If this element is not provided, a Patient subject is assumed.

The subject of a data requirement is critical, as the data being specified is determined with respect to a particular subject. This corresponds roughly to the notion of a Compartment in that it limits what data is available based on its relationship to the subject. In CQL, this corresponds to the context declaration.

The possible types of subjects for a data requirement (E.g., Patient, Practitioner, Organization, Location, etc.).

Indicates that specific elements of the type are referenced by the knowledge module and must be supported by the consumer in order to obtain an effective evaluation. This does not mean that a value is required for this element, only that the consuming system must understand the element and be able to provide values for it if they are available.

The value of mustSupport SHALL be a FHIRPath resolveable on the type of the DataRequirement. The path SHALL consist only of identifiers, constant indexers, and .resolve() (see the Simple FHIRPath Profile for full details).

Code filters specify additional constraints on the data, specifying the value set of interest for a particular element of the data. Each code filter defines an additional constraint on the data, i.e. code filters are AND'ed, not OR'ed.