FHIR Cross-Version Extensions package for FHIR R5 from FHIR R4 - Version 0.0.1-snapshot-2. See the Directory of published versions
| Official URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/4.0/ValueSet/R4-performer-function-for-R5 | Version: 0.0.1-snapshot-2 | |||
| Standards status: Informative | Maturity Level: 0 | Computable Name: R4_performer_function_for_R5 | ||
| This cross-version ValueSet represents concepts from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/performer-function | 4.0.1 for use in FHIR R5. Concepts not present here have direct equivalent mappings crossing all versions from R4 to R5. |
References
This value set is not used here; it may be used elsewhere (e.g. specifications and/or implementations that use this content)
http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType version 2018-08-12| Code | Display | Definition |
| PART | Participation | Indicates that the target of the participation is involved in some manner in the act, but does not qualify how. |
| CON | consultant | An advisor participating in the service by performing evaluations and making recommendations. |
| INF | informant | A source of reported information (e.g., a next of kin who answers questions about the patient's history). For history questions, the patient is logically an informant, yet the informant of history questions is implicitly the subject. |
| WIT | witness | Only with service events. A person witnessing the action happening without doing anything. A witness is not necessarily aware, much less approves of anything stated in the service event. Example for a witness is students watching an operation or an advanced directive witness. |
| SPRF | secondary performer | A person assisting in an act through his substantial presence and involvement This includes: assistants, technicians, associates, or whatever the job titles may be. |
| VRF | verifier | A person who verifies the correctness and appropriateness of the service (plan, order, event, etc.) and hence takes on accountability. |
| LA | legal authenticator | A verifier who legally authenticates the accuracy of an act. An example would be a staff physician who sees a patient and dictates a note, then later signs it. Their signature constitutes a legal authentication. |
This value set expansion contains 7 concepts.
| Code | System | Display | Definition |
| PART | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType | Participation | Indicates that the target of the participation is involved in some manner in the act, but does not qualify how. |
| CON | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType | consultant | An advisor participating in the service by performing evaluations and making recommendations. |
| INF | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType | informant | A source of reported information (e.g., a next of kin who answers questions about the patient's history). For history questions, the patient is logically an informant, yet the informant of history questions is implicitly the subject. |
| WIT | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType | witness | Only with service events. A person witnessing the action happening without doing anything. A witness is not necessarily aware, much less approves of anything stated in the service event. Example for a witness is students watching an operation or an advanced directive witness. |
| SPRF | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType | secondary performer | A person assisting in an act through his substantial presence and involvement This includes: assistants, technicians, associates, or whatever the job titles may be. |
| VRF | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType | verifier | A person who verifies the correctness and appropriateness of the service (plan, order, event, etc.) and hence takes on accountability. |
| LA | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType | legal authenticator | A verifier who legally authenticates the accuracy of an act. An example would be a staff physician who sees a patient and dictates a note, then later signs it. Their signature constitutes a legal authentication. |
Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:
| Level | A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. In this scheme, some codes are under other codes, and imply that the code they are under also applies |
| System | The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere) |
| Code | The code (used as the code in the resource instance) |
| Display | The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application |
| Definition | An explanation of the meaning of the concept |
| Comments | Additional notes about how to use the code |