FHIR Cross-Version Extensions package for FHIR R5 from FHIR R4
0.0.1-snapshot-2 - informative International flag

FHIR Cross-Version Extensions package for FHIR R5 from FHIR R4 - Version 0.0.1-snapshot-2. See the Directory of published versions

ValueSet: Cross-version VS for R4.Performer Function Codes for use in FHIR R5

Official URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/4.0/ValueSet/R4-performer-function-for-R5 Version: 0.0.1-snapshot-2
Standards status: Informative Maturity Level: 0 Computable Name: R4_performer_function_for_R5

This cross-version ValueSet represents concepts from http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/performer-function 4.0.1 for use in FHIR R5. Concepts not present here have direct equivalent mappings crossing all versions from R4 to R5.

References

This value set is not used here; it may be used elsewhere (e.g. specifications and/or implementations that use this content)

Logical Definition (CLD)

  • Include these codes as defined in http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType version 2018-08-12
    CodeDisplayDefinition
    PARTParticipationIndicates that the target of the participation is involved in some manner in the act, but does not qualify how.
    CONconsultantAn advisor participating in the service by performing evaluations and making recommendations.
    INFinformantA source of reported information (e.g., a next of kin who answers questions about the patient's history). For history questions, the patient is logically an informant, yet the informant of history questions is implicitly the subject.
    WITwitnessOnly with service events. A person witnessing the action happening without doing anything. A witness is not necessarily aware, much less approves of anything stated in the service event. Example for a witness is students watching an operation or an advanced directive witness.
    SPRFsecondary performerA person assisting in an act through his substantial presence and involvement This includes: assistants, technicians, associates, or whatever the job titles may be.
    VRFverifierA person who verifies the correctness and appropriateness of the service (plan, order, event, etc.) and hence takes on accountability.
    LAlegal authenticatorA verifier who legally authenticates the accuracy of an act. An example would be a staff physician who sees a patient and dictates a note, then later signs it. Their signature constitutes a legal authentication.

 

Expansion

This value set expansion contains 7 concepts.

CodeSystemDisplayDefinition
  PARThttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationTypeParticipation

Indicates that the target of the participation is involved in some manner in the act, but does not qualify how.

  CONhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationTypeconsultant

An advisor participating in the service by performing evaluations and making recommendations.

  INFhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationTypeinformant

A source of reported information (e.g., a next of kin who answers questions about the patient's history). For history questions, the patient is logically an informant, yet the informant of history questions is implicitly the subject.

  WIThttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationTypewitness

Only with service events. A person witnessing the action happening without doing anything. A witness is not necessarily aware, much less approves of anything stated in the service event. Example for a witness is students watching an operation or an advanced directive witness.

  SPRFhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationTypesecondary performer

A person assisting in an act through his substantial presence and involvement This includes: assistants, technicians, associates, or whatever the job titles may be.

  VRFhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationTypeverifier

A person who verifies the correctness and appropriateness of the service (plan, order, event, etc.) and hence takes on accountability.

  LAhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationTypelegal authenticator

A verifier who legally authenticates the accuracy of an act. An example would be a staff physician who sees a patient and dictates a note, then later signs it. Their signature constitutes a legal authentication.


Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:

Level A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. In this scheme, some codes are under other codes, and imply that the code they are under also applies
System The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere)
Code The code (used as the code in the resource instance)
Display The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application
Definition An explanation of the meaning of the concept
Comments Additional notes about how to use the code