Generated Narrative: StructureDefinition ext-R4-Contract.ter.act.subject Name Flags Card. Type Description & Constraints Extension 0..* Extension R4: Entity of the action (new) #xD; Slices for extension 1..* Extension Extension Slice: Unordered, Open by value:url #xD; extension:reference 1..* Extension R4: Entity of the action (new) #xD; url 1..1 uri "reference" #xD; value[x] 1..1 Reference(Cross-version Profile for R4.Patient for use in FHIR STU3(0.1.0) | Patient | Cross-version Profile for R4.RelatedPerson for use in FHIR STU3(0.1.0) | RelatedPerson | Cross-version Profile for R4.Practitioner for use in FHIR STU3(0.1.0) | Practitioner | Cross-version Profile for R4.PractitionerRole for use in FHIR STU3(0.1.0) | PractitionerRole | Cross-version Profile for R4.Device for use in FHIR STU3(0.1.0) | Device | Cross-version Profile for R4.Group for use in FHIR STU3(0.1.0) | Group | Cross-version Profile for R4.Organization for use in FHIR STU3(0.1.0) | Organization) Entity of the action #xD; extension:role 0..1 Extension R4: Role type of the agent (new) #xD; url 1..1 uri "role" #xD; value[x] 0..1 CodeableConcept Role type of the agent Binding: Contract Actor Role Codes (example): Detailed codes for the contract actor role. #xD; url 1..1 uri "http://hl7.org/fhir/4.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Contract.term.action.subject" #xD; value[x] 0..0 Value of extension #xD; Documentation for this format
R4: `Contract.term.action.subject` (new:BackboneElement)
This extension is part of the cross-version definitions generated to enable use of the element `Contract.term.action.subject` as defined in FHIR R4 in FHIR STU3. The source element is defined as: `Contract.term.action.subject` 0..* `BackboneElement` Following are the generation technical comments: Element `Contract.term.action.subject` has a context of Contract.term.action based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to `Contract`. Element `Contract.term.action.subject` has no mapping targets in FHIR STU3. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).
Element `Contract.term.action.subject` has a context of Contract.term.action based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to `Contract`. Element `Contract.term.action.subject` has no mapping targets in FHIR STU3. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).
All FHIR elements must have a @value or children
hasValue() | (children().count() > id.count())
Must have either extensions or value[x], not both
exists(f:extension)!=exists(f:*[starts-with(local-name(.), 'value')])
unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.
Extensions are always sliced by (at least) url
R4: `Contract.term.action.subject.reference` (new:Reference(Patient,RelatedPerson,Practitioner,PractitionerRole,Device,Group,Organization))
Element `Contract.term.action.subject.reference` is part of an existing definition because parent element `Contract.term.action.subject` requires a cross-version extension. Element `Contract.term.action.subject.reference` has a context of Contract.term.action based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to `Contract`. Element `Contract.term.action.subject.reference` has no mapping targets in FHIR STU3. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).
Additional Content defined by implementations
May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.
Source of the definition for the extension code - a logical name or a URL.
The definition may point directly to a computable or human-readable definition of the extensibility codes, or it may be a logical URI as declared in some other specification. The definition SHALL be a URI for the Structure Definition defining the extension.
The entity the action is performed or not performed on or for.
R4: `Contract.term.action.subject.role` (new:CodeableConcept)
Element `Contract.term.action.subject.role` is part of an existing definition because parent element `Contract.term.action.subject` requires a cross-version extension. Element `Contract.term.action.subject.role` has a context of Contract.term.action based on following the parent source element upwards and mapping to `Contract`. Element `Contract.term.action.subject.role` has no mapping targets in FHIR STU3. Typically, this is because the element has been added (is a new element).
Role type of agent assigned roles in this Contract.
Detailed codes for the contract actor role.
Value of extension - may be a resource or one of a constrained set of the data types (see Extensibility in the spec for list).