International Patient Summary Implementation Guide
This page is part of the International Patient Summary Implementation Guide (v0.1.0: STU 1 Ballot 1) based on FHIR R3. The current version which supercedes this version is 1.1.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions 
Introduction
An International Patient Summary (IPS) document is an electronic health record extract containing essential healthcare information intended for use in the unscheduled, cross-border care scenario, comprising at least the required elements of the IPS dataset. The IPS dataset is a minimal and non-exhaustive patient summary dataset, specialty-agnostic, condition-independent, but readily usable by clinicians for the cross-border unscheduled care of a patient.
Purpose
The goal of this Implementation Guide is to identify the required clinical data, vocabulary and value sets for an international patient summary. The international patient summary is specified either as templated document using HL7 CDA R2, either as HL7 FHIR composition (described in this guide). The primary use case is to provide support for cross-border or cross-juridictional emergency and unplanned care.
This specification aims to support:
- Cross-jurisdictional patient summaries (through adaptation/extension for multi-language and realm scenarios, including translation).
- Emergency and unplanned care in any country, regardless of language.
- Value sets based on international vocabularies that are usable and understandable in any country.
- Data and metadata for document-level provenance.
Project Background
See further details on the project background in the IPS Wiki here.
Project Scope
As expressed in the introduction, the International Patient Summary is:
- a minimal and non-exhaustive patient summary,
- specialty-agnostic,
- condition-independent,
- but readily usable by clinicians for cross-border unscheduled care of a patient. In this context, minimal and non-exhaustive means that an IPS is not intended to reproduce (the entire) content of an Electronic Health Record (EHR).
Specialty-agnostic means that an IPS is not filtered for a specialty. As an example, allergies are not filtered to the specialty of internal medicine, thus may also include food allergies, if considered to be relevant for, e.g. unplanned care.
Condition-independent means that an IPS is not specific to particular conditions, and focuses on the patient current condition(s).
Furthermore the scope of the IPS is global. Although this is a major challenge, this implementation guide takes various experiences and newer developments into account to address global feasibility as far as possible.
Relationships with Other Projects and Guidelines
See further details on the IPS project relationships with other projects and guidelines in the IPS Wiki here.
Ballot Status
This Implementation Guide is being balloted as STU with the intention to go normative in a subsequent ballot cycle.
Authors and Contributors
| Role | Name | Organization | contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Editor | Giorgio Cangioli, PhD | Consultant, HL7 Italy | giorgio.cangioli@gmail.com |
| Primary Editor | Rob Hausam | Hausam Consulting LLC | rob@hausamconsulting.com |
| Primary Editor | Dr Kai U. Heitmann | Heitmann Consulting and Services, Gefyra GmbH, HL7 Germany | info@kheitmann.de |
| Primary Editor | François Macary | Phast | francois.macary@phast.fr |
| Contributor | Dr Christof Geßner | Gematik | christof.gessner@gematik.de |
| Contributor | Gary Dickinson | CentriHealth | gary.dickinson@ehr-standards.com |
| Contributor | Catherine Chronaki | HL7 International Foundation | chronaki@gmail.com |
