This page is part of the Canonical Resource Management Infrastructure Implementation Guide (v1.0.0-ballot: STU1 Ballot 1) based on FHIR R4. . For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
Official URL: http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/crmi/OperationDefinition/crmi-data-requirements | Version: 1.0.0-ballot | |||
Draft as of 2023-03-12 | Computable Name: CRMIDataRequirements |
Determines the effective data requirements for the artifact, including known components and dependencies, and optionally informed by a version manifest.
See $crmi.package and $crmi.data-requirements
TODO: Add example of the use-case that will do dependency tracing, similar to
$package
but returns only the information and not the actual resources.
URL: [base]/ActivityDefinition/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ActivityDefinition/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/CapabilityStatement/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/CapabilityStatement/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ChargeItemDefinition/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ChargeItemDefinition/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/CodeSystem/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/CodeSystem/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/CompartmentDefinition/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/CompartmentDefinition/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ConceptMap/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ConceptMap/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/EffectEvidenceSynthesis/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/EffectEvidenceSynthesis/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/EventDefinition/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/EventDefinition/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/Evidence/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/Evidence/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/EvidenceVariable/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/EvidenceVariable/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ExampleScenario/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ExampleScenario/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/GraphDefinition/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/GraphDefinition/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ImplementationGuide/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ImplementationGuide/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/Library/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/Library/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/Measure/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/Measure/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/MessageDefinition/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/MessageDefinition/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/NamingSystem/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/NamingSystem/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/OperationDefinition/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/OperationDefinition/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/PlanDefinition/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/PlanDefinition/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/Questionnaire/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/Questionnaire/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ResearchDefinition/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ResearchDefinition/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ResearchElementDefinition/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ResearchElementDefinition/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/RiskEvidenceSynthesis/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/RiskEvidenceSynthesis/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/SearchParameter/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/SearchParameter/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/StructureDefinition/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/StructureDefinition/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/StructureMap/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/StructureMap/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/TerminologyCapabilities/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/TerminologyCapabilities/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/TestScript/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/TestScript/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ValueSet/$crmi.data-requirements
URL: [base]/ValueSet/[id]/$crmi.data-requirements
Parameters
Use | Name | Scope | Cardinality | Type | Binding | Documentation |
IN | id | 0..1 | string | The logical id of the canonical resource to analyze. | ||
IN | url | 0..1 | uri | A canonical reference to a canonical resource. | ||
IN | version | 0..1 | string | The version of the canonical resource to analyze | ||
IN | identifier | 0..1 | string (token) | A business identifier of the canonical resource to be analyzed. | ||
IN | expression | 0..* | string | The name of a specific expression to be considered for analysis. If no expressions are specified, the analysis is performed on the entire resource. If expressions are specified, the analysis is performed only on the expressions specified. | ||
IN | parameters | 0..1 | Parameters | Any input parameters for the artifact. Parameters defined in this input will be bound by name to parameters defined in the CQL library (or referenced libraries). Parameter types are mapped to CQL as specified in the Using CQL section of this implementation guide. If a parameter appears more than once in the input Parameters resource, it is represented with a List in the input CQL. If a parameter has parts, it is represented as a Tuple in the input CQL. NOTE: Does this only apply to Library resource types? | ||
IN | canonicalVersion | 0..* | canonical | Specifies a version to use for a canonical resource if the artifact referencing the resource does not already specify a version. The format is the same as a canonical URL: [url]|[version] - e.g. http://loinc.org|2.56 Note that this is a generalization of the | ||
IN | checkCanonicalVersion | 0..* | canonical | Edge Case: Specifies a version to use for a canonical resource. If the artifact referencing the resource specifies a different version, an error is returned instead of the package. The format is the same as a canonical URL: [url]|[version] - e.g. http://loinc.org|2.56 Note that this is a generalization of the | ||
IN | forceCanonicalVersion | 0..* | canonical | Edge Case: Specifies a version to use for a canonical resource. This parameter overrides any specified version in the artifact (and any artifacts it depends on). The format is the same as a canonical URL: [system]|[version] - e.g. http://loinc.org|2.56. Note that this has obvious safety issues, in that it may result in a value set expansion giving a different list of codes that is both wrong and unsafe, and implementers should only use this capability reluctantly. It primarily exists to deal with situations where specifications have fallen into decay as time passes. If the version of a canonical is overriden, the version used SHALL explicitly be represented in the expansion parameters. Note that this is a generalization of the | ||
IN | manifest | 0..1 | canonical | Specifies an asset-collection library that defines version bindings for code
systems and other canonical resources referenced by the value set(s) being expanded
and other canonical resources referenced by the artifact. When specified, code
systems and other canonical resources identified as | ||
IN | include | 0..* | string | Specifies what contents should be included in the resulting package. The codes indicate which types of resources should be included, but note that the set of possible resources is determined as all known (i.e. present on the server) dependencies and related artifacts. Possible values are:
| ||
IN | contentEndpoint | 0..1 | Endpoint | An endpoint to use to access content (i.e. libraries, activities, measures, questionnaires, and plans) referenced by the artifact. If no content endpoint is supplied the evaluation will attempt to retrieve content from the server on which the operation is being performed. | ||
IN | terminologyEndpoint | 0..1 | Endpoint | An endpoint to use to access terminology (i.e. valuesets, codesystems, naming systems, concept maps, and membership testing) referenced by the Resource. If no terminology endpoint is supplied, the evaluation will attempt to use the server on which the operation is being performed as the terminology server. | ||
OUT | return | 1..1 | Bundle | The result of the requirements operation is a module-definition Library that returns the computed effective requirements of the artifact. |
The requirements operation supports the ability of a repository to determine the effective requirements of an artifact, including terminology usage (code systems, value sets, and direct-reference codes), parameters, dependencies (artifacts), and data requirements