This page is part of the Using CQL with FHIR Implementation Guide (v1.0.0: STU1) based on FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) R4. This is the current published version in its permanent home (it will always be available at this URL). For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
This topic specifies conformance requirements for the use of Clinical Quality Language (CQL) with Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR), whether that be as in-line expressions in expression-valued elements, or in CQL libraries contained in FHIR Library resources.
Declarations in CQL are packaged in containers called libraries which provide a unit for the definition, distribution, and versioning of CQL logic. The following conformance requirements and guidance apply when libraries of CQL are used with FHIR knowledge artifacts.
Conformance Requirement 2.1 (Library Declaration):
The example in the Author’s Guide from the above library declaration link is not following the “Using CQL With FHIR” convention of prohibiting underscores in library names.
For example:
library EXM146
This declaration specifies the name of the library as EXM146
. See the discussion on Library Resources for more information on library naming conventions.
This Implementation Guide (IG) recommends Semantic Versioning be used to version libraries used within knowledge artifacts to help track and manage dependencies.
Conformance Requirement 2.2 (Library Versioning):
There are three main types of changes that can be made to a library:
By exposing version numbers that identify all three types of changes, libraries can be versioned in a way that makes clear when a change will impact usage, versus when a change can potentially be safely incorporated as an update. The first type of change will be referred to as a “major” change, and will require incrementing the “major version number”. The second type of change will be referred to as a “minor” change, and will only require incrementing the “minor version number”. And finally, the third type of change will be referred to as a “patch”, and will only require incrementing the “patch version number”. Version numbers for CQL libraries can then be represented as:
<major>.<minor>.<patch>
For example:
library EXM146 version '1.0.0'
This would indicate the first major version of the EXM146 library. A minor change could be released by incrementing the minor version:
library EXM146 version '1.1.0'
And a major change could be released by incrementing the major version, and resetting the minor version: Minor changes are expected to retain backwards-compatibility, but may introduce new features and functionality, while patch changes are expected to retain forward and backwards-compatibility, and may only be used to fix issues.
library EXM146 version '2.0.0'
Snippet 2-1: Library line from EXM146.cql, the second major version.
Note that when CQL libraries are included as part of larger groupings of artifacts (such as quality measures or computable guidelines), the version of the library is specified along with all the other artifacts in the larger group. For more guidance on versioning these artifacts as a group, refer to the Versioning topic in the Canonical Resource Management Infrastructure (CRMI) implementation guide.
CQL allows libraries to re-use logic already defined in other libraries. This is accomplished by utilizing the include declaration as in Snippet 2-2.
include Common version '2.0.0' called Common
Snippet 2-2: Nested library within EXM146.cql
The set of all CQL libraries used as part of a knowledge artifact must adhere to Conformance Requirement 2.3.
Conformance Requirement 2.3 (Nested Libraries):
name
of the library (i.e. library-name.expression-identifier
)called
clause for all included librariescalled
-alias for an included library SHOULD be consistent for usages across librariesThe recommendation that CQL libraries be structured such that all references to expressions from a FHIR artifact are to a single Library is a simplification to ensure that expression references from FHIR artifacts don’t require qualified expressions (as they would if multiple libraries were referenced). However, there are valid use cases for allowing multiple libraries to be referenced, such as modular questionnaires, and dependent library references. However, when an artifact uses multiple libraries, all expressions within the artifact SHALL be qualified.
CQL allows libraries to define a namespace that can be used to organize libraries across different groups of users.
Within a namespace, library names are required to be unique. Across namespaces, the same library name may be reused.
For example, OrganizationA and OrganizationB can both define a library named Common
, so long as they use different
namespaces. For example, consider the following library declaration:
library CMS.Common version '2.0.0'
This example declares a library named Common in the CMS namespace. Per the CQL specification, the namespace for a
library is included in the ELM in the Library.identifier
element, along with a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) that provides a globally unique, stable identifier for the namespace.
For example, the URI for the CMS namespace might be https://ecqi.healthit.gov/ecqm/measures
.
Note that this is a URI that may or may not correspond to a reachable web address (a Uniform Resource Locater (URL)). The important aspect is not the addressability, but the uniqueness, ensuring that library name collisions cannot occur.
Conformance Requirement 2.4 (Library Namespaces):
In addition, because the namespace of a library functions as part of the globally unique identifier for the library, changing the namespace of the library results in a different artifact.
CQL can be used with any data model(s). To be used with FHIR, CQL requires model information. To facilitate use with any FHIR content, a general-purpose FHIR information model is included in the Clinical Quality Framework Common FHIR Assets implementation guide. However, CQL may also be used with implementation-guide specific model information (i.e. structures based on the profile definitions in an IG).
Conformance Requirement 2.5 (CQL Using FHIR-based Data Models):
For example:
using FHIR version '4.0.1'
Snippet 2-3: Data Model line from Example.cql
Conformance Requirement 2.6 describes how to specify a code system within a CQL library.
Conformance Requirement 2.6 (Code System Specification):
codesystem "SNOMED CT:2017-09": 'http://snomed.info/sct'
version 'http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/201709'
Snippet 2-4: codesystem definition line from Example.cql.
The canonical URL for a code system is a globally unique, stable, version-independent identifier for the code system. The HL7 Terminology (THO) site defines canonical URLs for most common code systems.
The local identifier for the codesystem (“SNOMED CT:2017-09” in this case) should include the friendly name of the code system and optionally, an indication of the version, separated with a colon.
Version information for code systems is not required to be included in knowledge artifacts; terminology versioning information may be specified externally. However, if versioning information is included, it must be done in accordance with the terminology usage specified by FHIR.
If no version is specified, then the default behavior for a FHIR terminology server is to use the most recent code system version available on the server.
Conformance Requirement 2.7 describes how to specify a value set within a CQL library.
Conformance Requirement 2.7 (Value Set Specification):
For example:
valueset "Absent or Unknown Allergies - IPS": 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/ValueSet/absent-or-unknown-allergies-uv-ips'
Snippet 2-5: Valueset reference from Example.cql.
The canonical URL for a value set is typically defined by the value set author, though it may be provided by the
publisher as well. For example, value sets defined in the International Patient Summary have a base URL of http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/
.
This base is then used to construct the canonical URL for the value set (in the same way as any FHIR URL) using the resource type
(ValueSet
in this case) and a unique identifier for the value set within that url (typically the same as the value set id in
the implementation guide). Note that the canonical URL is a globally unique, stable, version-independent identifier for the
value set. See Canonical URLs in the base FHIR specification for more information.
The local identifier for the value set within CQL SHOULD be the same as the title
of the value set. However, because the title of the value set is not
necessarily unique, it is possible to reference multiple value sets with the same title, but different identifiers.
When this happens in a CQL library, the local identifier SHOULD be the title of the value set with a qualifying suffix to
preserve the value set title as a human-readable reference, but still allow unique reference within the CQL library.
For example:
valueset "Acute Pharyngitis (1)": 'http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/acute-pharyngitis-snomed'
valueset "Acute Pharyngitis (2)": 'http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/acute-pharyngitis-icd'
Note carefully that although this URL may be resolvable for some terminology implementations, this is not necessarily the
case. This use of a canonical URL can be resolved as a search by the url
element:
GET fhir/ValueSet?url=http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/acute-pharyngitis-snomed
A note about usage of the term value set in this documentation: “Value set”, with two words, regardless of case, is the human-readable spelling. “ValueSet”, with one word and in PascalCase, is the FHIR Type. “valueset”, with one word and all lower case, is the proper spelling for use within CQL statements and expressions.
Version information for value sets is not required to be included in knowledge artifacts; terminology versioning information may be specified externally. However, if versioning information is included, it must be done in accordance with the terminology usage specified by FHIR.
Conformance Requirement 2.8 describes how to specify a value set, including the definition version to be used.
Conformance Requirement 2.8 (Value Set Specification Including Version):
version
clause of the value set declarationFor example:
valueset "Encounter Inpatient SNOMEDCT Value Set":
'http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/encounter-inpatient' version '20160929'
Snippet 2-6: valueset definition from Example.cql.
This is a version specific value set reference, and can be resolved as a search by the url
and version
elements:
GET fhir/ValueSet?url=http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/encounter-inpatient&version=20160929
It is important to maintain the distinction between the definition of a value set and the expansion of a value set. The searches described in previous sections all retrieve the definition of a value set. For the purposes of local evaluation, implementations may wish to retrieve the expansion of a value set, or the set of all codes that are defined to be in the value set by the definition.
Because the definition of a value set can, and often does, include codes from a code system based on properties of that code system, the expansion of a value set is sensitive to the versions of the code systems used in the definition. This means that in general, the expansion of a value set is version-specific, and care must be taken to ensure that version considerations are taken into account when using the results of an expansion.
Conformance Requirement 2.9 (Value Set Expansion):
in(ValueSet)
), as opposed to requiring computation on the lists of codes in a value set. See the Terminology Operators section of the CQL specification for more information.For example, rather than combining multiple value sets using a union
, separate membership tests in each value set SHOULD be used. For more information, see the Value Set Expansion topic in the base FHIR specification.
When value sets are used within knowledge artifacts, if the artifact includes narrative (Human-readable), it SHALL include a representation of at least the following information for each value set:
For example:
"Encounter Inpatient": "Encounter Inpatient SNOMEDCT Value Set" (http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/encounter-inpatient, version 20160929)
Although CQL allows the use of strings as input to membership testing in value sets, this capability should not be used with FHIR-based models as it can lead to incorrect matching if the code system is not considered.
Conformance Requirement 2.10 (String-based Membership Testing):
For example, given a value set named "Administrative Gender"
, the following CQL expression is not recommended:
'female' in "Administrative Gender"
This is because there is no code system associated with the string 'female'
so the comparison to codes in the value set is only partial. There are use cases for this, such as when comparing a string-valued element in FHIR, for example:
First(Patient.address).state in "New England States"
In this case, because the state
element is string-valued, there is no straightforward way to associate a system, and the string-based membership testing is simpler than requiring the construction of a Code
value. However, care should be taken with this usage to ensure the string values do not match codes from an unexpected system. Furthermore, if the element being tested is terminology-valued, terminology membership testing SHOULD be used.
When direct-reference codes are represented within CQL, the logical identifier SHALL NOT be a URI. Instead, the logical identifier SHOULD be the code from the code system.
Conformance Requirement 2.11 (Direct Referenced Codes):
code "Venous foot pump, device (physical object)": '442023007' from "SNOMED CT"
Snippet 2-7: code definition from Example.cql.
Note that for direct-reference code usage, the local identifier (in Snippet 2-7 the local identifier is “Venous foot pump, device (physical object)”) SHOULD be the same as the description of the code within the terminology in order to avoid conflicting with any usage or license agreements with the referenced terminologies, but can be different to allow for potential naming conflicts, as well as simplification of longer names when appropriate.
CQL supports both version-specific and version-independent specification of and comparison to direct-reference codes. The best practice is for artifact authors to use version-independent direct-reference codes and comparisons unless there is a specific reason not to (such as the code is retired in the current version). Even in the case that version-specific direct-reference codes are required, best practice is still to use the equivalent (~) operator in CQL for the comparison (again, unless there is a specific reason to do version-specific comparison)
When direct-reference codes are used within knowledge artifacts, if the artifact includes narrative (Human-readable), it SHALL include a representation of at least the following information for each direct-reference code:
For example:
code "Venous foot pump, device (physical object)": '442023007' from "SNOMEDCT" display Venous foot pump, device (physical object)"
Although the Unified Code for Units of Measure (UCUM) is a code system, it requires specific handling for two reasons. First, it is a grammar-based code system with an effectively infinite number of codes, so membership tests must be performed computationally, rather than just by checking for existence of a code in a list; and second, because UCUM codes are so commonly used as part of quantity values, healthcare contexts typically provide direct mechanisms for using UCUM codes.
For these reasons, within quality artifacts in general, and quality measures specifically, UCUM codes SHOULD make use of the direct mechanisms wherever possible. In CQL logic, this means using the Quantity
literal, rather than declaring UCUM codes as direct-reference codes as is recommended when using codes from other code systems. For example, when accessing a Body Mass Index (BMI) observation in CQL:
define "BMI in Measurement Period":
[Observation: "BMI"] BMI
where BMI.status in {'final', 'amended', 'corrected'}
and BMI.effective during "Measurement Period"
and BMI.value is not null
and BMI.value.code = 'kg/m2'
Notice the use of the UCUM code directly, as opposed to declaring a CQL code for the unit:
// Anti-pattern illustrating inappropriate use of code system and code declarations for UCUM
codesystem UCUM: 'http://unitsofmeasure.org'
code "kg/m2": 'kg/m2' from UCUM
define "BMI in Measurement Period":
[Observation: "BMI"] BMI
where BMI.status in {'final', 'amended', 'corrected'}
and BMI.effective during "Measurement Period"
and BMI.value is not null
and BMI.value.code = "kg/m2"
// Anti-pattern illustrating inappropriate use of code system and code declarations for UCUM
In addition to codes, CQL supports a concept construct, which is defined as a set of codes that are all about the same concept, (e.g. the same concept represented in different code systems, or the same concept from the same code system represented at different levels of detail), but CQL itself will make no attempt to ensure that is the case. Concepts should never be used as a surrogate for proper value set definition. In other words, the Concept declaration should not be used to define sets of codes for membership testing.
Conformance Requirement 2.12 (Concepts):
The following example illustrates appropriate usage of the Concept construct to establish a “Tiredness” concept that has both a context-specific and a standardized representation:
codesystem "Antenatal Care Concepts": 'http://example.org/fhir/CodeSystem/anc-codes-example'
codesystem "ICD-11": 'http://id.who.int/icd/release/11/mms'
code "Tiredness Code": 'ANC.B5.DE40' from "Antenatal Care Concepts" display 'Tiredness'
code "MB22.7": 'MB22.7' from "ICD-11" display 'Tiredness'
concept "Tiredness": { "Tiredness Code", "MB22.7" } display 'Tiredness'
As an example of an anti-pattern for Concept usage, consider the following:
// Anti-pattern illustrating inappropriate use of the Concept construct
codesystem "Condition Clinical Status Codes": 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-clinical'
code "Active": 'active' from "Condition Clinical Status Codes" display 'Active'
code "Recurrence": 'recurrence' from "Condition Clinical Status Codes" display 'Recurrence'
code "Relapse": 'relapse' from "Condition Clinical Status Codes" display 'Relapse'
concept "Active Condition Statuses": { "Active", "Recurrence", "Relapse" } display 'Active Condition Statuses'
// Anti-pattern illustrating inappropriate use of the Concept construct
This usage of concept includes multiple concepts with different meanings from the same code system. Instead, a value set SHOULD be used for this purpose as it provides more flexibility and maintainability for this use case.
A “library-level identifier” is any named expression, function, parameter, code system, value set, concept, or code defined in the CQL. The library name referenced in the library-line, the data model, and any referenced external library should not be considered “library-level identifiers”. Library-level identifiers ought to be given a descriptive meaningful name (avoid abbreviations) and conform to Conformance Requirement 2.13.
Conformance Requirement 2.13 (Library-level Identifiers):
NOTE: Initial Case is defined as the first letter of every word is capitalized (e.g. “Includes Or Starts During”) (as opposed to Title Case, which traditionally does not capitalize conjunctions and prepositions, e.g. “Includes or Starts During”)
For example:
define function
"Includes Or Starts During"(Condition Condition, Encounter Encounter):
Interval[Condition.onset, Condition.abatement] includes Encounter.period
or Condition.onset during Encounter.period
Snippet 2-8: Function definition from Example.cql.
The "Includes Or Starts During"
is the library-level identifier in this example.
A “data type” in CQL refers to any named type used within CQL expressions. They may be primitive types, such as the system-defined “Integer” and “DateTime”, or they may be model-defined types such as “Encounter” or “Medication”. For FHIR-based knowledge artifacts using model information based on implementation guides (such as the QI-Core profiles), these will be the author-friendly identifiers for the profile.
Conformance Requirement 2.14 (Data Type Names):
For example:
define "Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Performed":
[Procedure: "Flexible Sigmoidoscopy"] FlexibleSigmoidoscopy
where FlexibleSigmoidoscopy.status = 'completed'
and FlexibleSigmoidoscopy.performed ends 5 years or less on or before end of "Measurement Period"
Snippet 2-9: Expression definition from Example.cql.
The Procedure
is the name of the model data type (FHIR resource type) in this example.
Conformance Requirement 2.15 (Element Names):
Examples of elements conforming to Conformance Requirement 2.15 are given below. For a full list of valid of elements, refer to an appropriate data model specification such as QI-Core.
Note: When FHIR and FHIR IGs are used as the data model, the term “element” is synonymous with “attribute”. Some data models, such as QDM, use the term “attribute”.
period
authoredOn
result
Aliases are used in CQL to reference items within the scope of a query. When defining a function, argument names are used to create scoped identifiers that refer to the function inputs. Both aliases and argument names conform to Conformance Requirement 2.16.
Conformance Requirement 2.16 (Aliases and Argument Names):
For example:
define "Encounters During Measurement Period":
"Valid Encounters" QualifyingEncounter
where QualifyingEncounter.period during "Measurement Period"
define function "ED Stay Time"(Encounter "Encounter"):
duration in minutes of Encounter.period