Profile Comparison between http://hl7.org/fhir/us/cqfmeasures/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation vs http://hl7.org/fhir/us/cqfmeasures/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation

Left:CQFM Improvement Notation (http://hl7.org/fhir/us/cqfmeasures/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation)
Right:CQFM Improvement Notation (http://hl7.org/fhir/us/cqfmeasures/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation)

Messages

InformationStructureDefinition.dateValues for date differ: '2024-04-09T13:20:21+00:00' vs '2024-11-04T20:11:26+00:00'

Metadata

NameValueComments
.abstractfalse
    .baseDefinitionhttp://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Extension
      .copyright
        .date2024-04-09T13:20:21+00:002024-11-04T20:11:26+00:00
        • Values Differ
        .descriptionInformation on whether an increase or decrease in score is the preferred result (e.g., a higher score indicates better quality OR a lower score indicates better quality OR quality is within a range). **Additional Guidance: improvementNotation** `Reference range` with definition of score within a defined interval (or a “passing score” over or under a certain threshold) indicates better quality to the improvement notation value set. Please provide comments on this additional code and if there are other codes needed in this value set. Please provide comments on this additional code and if there are other codes needed in the improvement notation value set. If an additional code is added to the improvement notation (like normative reference range as suggested), where is guidance about the reference range best included in the specification for implementer use? Some suggestions include: the guidance field, the rate aggregation field or adding an extension to improvementNotation to add text.
          .experimentalfalse
            .fhirVersion4.0.1
              .jurisdiction
                ..jurisdiction[0]urn:iso:std:iso:3166#US
                  .kindcomplex-type
                    .nameCQFMImprovementNotation
                      .publisherHL7 International / Clinical Quality Information
                        .purpose**Purpose** Measure consumers and implementers must be able to determine how to interpret a measure score.
                          .statusactive
                            .titleCQFM Improvement Notation
                              .typeExtension
                                .urlhttp://hl7.org/fhir/us/cqfmeasures/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation
                                  .version4.0.0

                                    Structure

                                    NameL FlagsL Card.L TypeL Description & ConstraintsR FlagsR Card.R TypeR Description & ConstraintsCommentsdoco
                                    .. Extension 0..1Extensionincrease | decrease
                                    0..1Extensionincrease | decrease
                                      ... id 0..1stringUnique id for inter-element referencing0..1stringUnique id for inter-element referencing
                                        ... Slices for extension 0..*ExtensionAdditional content defined by implementations
                                        Slice: Unordered, Open by value:url
                                        0..*ExtensionAdditional content defined by implementations
                                        Slice: Unordered, Open by value:url
                                          ... url 1..1uri"http://hl7.org/fhir/us/cqfmeasures/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation"1..1uri"http://hl7.org/fhir/us/cqfmeasures/StructureDefinition/cqfm-improvementNotation"

                                            doco Documentation for this format