FHIR Tooling Extensions IG
0.2.0 - Release 0.2.0 International flag

This page is part of the HL7 Tools Extension IG (v0.2.0: Releases - Informative) based on FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) v5.0.0. This is the current published version in its permanent home (it will always be available at this URL). For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions

: ConceptMapEquivalence - JSON Representation

Active as of 2019-11-01

Raw json | Download


{
  "resourceType" : "CodeSystem",
  "id" : "r4-equivalence",
  "text" : {
    "status" : "generated",
    "div" : "<div xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><div xml:lang=\"en\" lang=\"en\"><hr/><p><b>English</b></p><hr/><p>This case-sensitive code system <code>http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem/r4-equivalence</code> defines the following codes in a Is-A hierarchy:</p><table class=\"codes\"><tr><td><b>Lvl</b></td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><b>Code</b></td><td><b>Display</b></td><td><b>Definition</b></td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">relatedto<a name=\"r4-equivalence-relatedto\"> </a></td><td>Related To</td><td>The concepts are related to each other, and have at least some overlap in meaning, but      the exact relationship is not known.</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0equal<a name=\"r4-equivalence-equal\"> </a></td><td>Equal</td><td>The definitions of the concepts are exactly the same (i.e. only grammatical differences)         and structural implications of meaning are identical or irrelevant (i.e. intentionally         identical).</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0wider<a name=\"r4-equivalence-wider\"> </a></td><td>Wider</td><td>The target mapping is wider in meaning than the source concept.</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0subsumes<a name=\"r4-equivalence-subsumes\"> </a></td><td>Subsumes</td><td>The target mapping subsumes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the source is-a target).</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0narrower<a name=\"r4-equivalence-narrower\"> </a></td><td>Narrower</td><td>The target mapping is narrower in meaning than the source concept. The sense in which        the mapping is narrower SHALL be described in the comments in this case, and applications        should be careful when attempting to use these mappings operationally.</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0specializes<a name=\"r4-equivalence-specializes\"> </a></td><td>Specializes</td><td>The target mapping specializes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the target is-a        source).</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0inexact<a name=\"r4-equivalence-inexact\"> </a></td><td>Inexact</td><td>The target mapping overlaps with the source concept, but both source and target cover        additional meaning, or the definitions are imprecise and it is uncertain whether they        have the same boundaries to their meaning. The sense in which the mapping is inexact SHALL        be described in the comments in this case, and applications should be careful when attempting        to use these mappings operationally.</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">unmatched<a name=\"r4-equivalence-unmatched\"> </a></td><td>Unmatched</td><td>There is no match for this concept in the target code system.</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0disjoint<a name=\"r4-equivalence-disjoint\"> </a></td><td>Disjoint</td><td>This is an explicit assertion that there is no mapping between the source and target concept.</td></tr></table></div><div xml:lang=\"es\" lang=\"es\"><hr/><p><b>Spanish</b></p><hr/><p>This case-sensitive code system <code>http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem/r4-equivalence</code> defines the following codes in a Is-A hierarchy:</p><table class=\"codes\"><tr><td><b>Lvl</b></td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><b>Code</b></td><td><b>Display</b></td><td><b>Definition</b></td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">relatedto<a name=\"r4-equivalence-relatedto\"> </a></td><td>Related To</td><td>The concepts are related to each other, and have at least some overlap in meaning, but      the exact relationship is not known.</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0equal<a name=\"r4-equivalence-equal\"> </a></td><td>Equal</td><td>The definitions of the concepts are exactly the same (i.e. only grammatical differences)         and structural implications of meaning are identical or irrelevant (i.e. intentionally         identical).</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0wider<a name=\"r4-equivalence-wider\"> </a></td><td>Wider</td><td>The target mapping is wider in meaning than the source concept.</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0subsumes<a name=\"r4-equivalence-subsumes\"> </a></td><td>Subsumes</td><td>The target mapping subsumes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the source is-a target).</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0narrower<a name=\"r4-equivalence-narrower\"> </a></td><td>Narrower</td><td>The target mapping is narrower in meaning than the source concept. The sense in which        the mapping is narrower SHALL be described in the comments in this case, and applications        should be careful when attempting to use these mappings operationally.</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0specializes<a name=\"r4-equivalence-specializes\"> </a></td><td>Specializes</td><td>The target mapping specializes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the target is-a        source).</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0inexact<a name=\"r4-equivalence-inexact\"> </a></td><td>Inexact</td><td>The target mapping overlaps with the source concept, but both source and target cover        additional meaning, or the definitions are imprecise and it is uncertain whether they        have the same boundaries to their meaning. The sense in which the mapping is inexact SHALL        be described in the comments in this case, and applications should be careful when attempting        to use these mappings operationally.</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">unmatched<a name=\"r4-equivalence-unmatched\"> </a></td><td>Unmatched</td><td>There is no match for this concept in the target code system.</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style=\"white-space:nowrap\">\u00a0\u00a0disjoint<a name=\"r4-equivalence-disjoint\"> </a></td><td>Disjoint</td><td>This is an explicit assertion that there is no mapping between the source and target concept.</td></tr></table></div></div>"
  },
  "extension" : [
    {
      "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg",
      "valueCode" : "fhir"
    }
  ],
  "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem/r4-equivalence",
  "identifier" : [
    {
      "system" : "urn:ietf:rfc:3986",
      "value" : "urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.4.18"
    }
  ],
  "version" : "0.2.0",
  "name" : "ConceptMapEquivalence",
  "title" : "ConceptMapEquivalence",
  "status" : "active",
  "experimental" : false,
  "date" : "2019-11-01T09:29:23+11:00",
  "publisher" : "HL7 International / FHIR Infrastructure",
  "contact" : [
    {
      "telecom" : [
        {
          "system" : "url",
          "value" : "http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/fiwg"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "description" : "The degree of equivalence between concepts (R4).",
  "jurisdiction" : [
    {
      "coding" : [
        {
          "system" : "http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm",
          "code" : "001"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "caseSensitive" : true,
  "hierarchyMeaning" : "is-a",
  "content" : "complete",
  "concept" : [
    {
      "code" : "relatedto",
      "display" : "Related To",
      "definition" : "The concepts are related to each other, and have at least some overlap in meaning, but      the exact relationship is not known.",
      "concept" : [
        {
          "code" : "equal",
          "display" : "Equal",
          "definition" : "The definitions of the concepts are exactly the same (i.e. only grammatical differences)         and structural implications of meaning are identical or irrelevant (i.e. intentionally         identical)."
        },
        {
          "code" : "wider",
          "display" : "Wider",
          "definition" : "The target mapping is wider in meaning than the source concept."
        },
        {
          "code" : "subsumes",
          "display" : "Subsumes",
          "definition" : "The target mapping subsumes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the source is-a target)."
        },
        {
          "code" : "narrower",
          "display" : "Narrower",
          "definition" : "The target mapping is narrower in meaning than the source concept. The sense in which        the mapping is narrower SHALL be described in the comments in this case, and applications        should be careful when attempting to use these mappings operationally."
        },
        {
          "code" : "specializes",
          "display" : "Specializes",
          "definition" : "The target mapping specializes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the target is-a        source)."
        },
        {
          "code" : "inexact",
          "display" : "Inexact",
          "definition" : "The target mapping overlaps with the source concept, but both source and target cover        additional meaning, or the definitions are imprecise and it is uncertain whether they        have the same boundaries to their meaning. The sense in which the mapping is inexact SHALL        be described in the comments in this case, and applications should be careful when attempting        to use these mappings operationally."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "code" : "unmatched",
      "display" : "Unmatched",
      "definition" : "There is no match for this concept in the target code system.",
      "concept" : [
        {
          "code" : "disjoint",
          "display" : "Disjoint",
          "definition" : "This is an explicit assertion that there is no mapping between the source and target concept."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}