This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v3.0.2: STU 3). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3 R2
Patient Administration Work Group | Maturity Level: N/A | Ballot Status: Informative | Compartments: Device, Patient, Practitioner, RelatedPerson |
Appointment request
{ "resourceType": "Appointment", "id": "examplereq", "text": { "status": "generated", "div": "<div xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\">Brian MRI results discussion</div>" }, "identifier": [ { "system": "http://example.org/sampleappointment-identifier", "value": "123" } ], "status": "proposed", "serviceCategory": { "coding": [ { "system": "http://example.org/service-category", "code": "gp", "display": "General Practice" } ] }, "specialty": [ { "coding": [ { "system": "http://example.org/specialty", "code": "gp", "display": "General Practice" } ] } ], "appointmentType": { "coding": [ { "system": "http://example.org/appointment-type", "code": "wi", "display": "Walk in" } ] }, "reason": [ { "coding": [ { "system": "http://snomed.info/sct", "code": "413095006" } ], "text": "Clinical Review" } ], "priority": 5, "description": "Discussion on the results of your recent MRI", "minutesDuration": 15, "slot": [ { "reference": "Slot/example" } ], "created": "2015-12-02", "comment": "Further expand on the results of the MRI and determine the next actions that may be appropriate.", "participant": [ { "actor": { "reference": "Patient/example", "display": "Peter James Chalmers" }, "required": "required", "status": "needs-action" }, { "type": [ { "coding": [ { "system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/v3/ParticipationType", "code": "ATND" } ] } ], "required": "required", "status": "needs-action" }, { "actor": { "reference": "Location/1", "display": "South Wing, second floor" }, "required": "required", "status": "accepted" } ], "requestedPeriod": [ { "start": "2016-06-02", "end": "2016-06-09" } ] }
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.