This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v4.0.1: R4 - Mixed Normative and STU) in it's permanent home (it will always be available at this URL). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3
Orders and Observations Work Group | Maturity Level: N/A | Standards Status: Informative | Compartments: Not linked to any defined compartments |
This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML, JSON or Turtle format. This example conforms to the profile Task.
Generated Narrative with Details
id: example5
identifier: 20170201-001 (OFFICIAL)
basedOn: General Wellness Careplan
groupIdentifier: G20170201-001 (OFFICIAL)
status: in-progress
businessStatus: specimen received, test in progress (Details )
intent: order
priority: routine
code: Lipid Panel (Details )
description: Create order for getting specimen, Set up inhouse testing, generate order for any sendouts and submit with specimen
focus: Lipid Panel Request
for: Peter James Chalmers
encounter: Example In-Patient Encounter
executionPeriod: 31/10/2016 8:25:05 AM --> (ongoing)
authoredOn: 31/10/2016 8:25:05 AM
lastModified: 31/10/2016 4:45:05 PM
requester: Dr Adam Careful
performerType: Performer (Details : {http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/task-performer-type code 'performer' = 'performer', given as 'Performer'})
owner: Clinical Laboratory @ Acme Hospital
reasonCode: The Task.reason should only be included if there is no Task.focus or if it differs from the reason indicated on the focus (Details )
note: This is an example to demonstrate using task for actioning a servicerequest and to illustrate how to populate many of the task elements - this is the parent task that will be broken into subtask to grab the specimen and a sendout lab test
- | Repetitions | Period |
* | 1 | ?? --> 02/11/2016 9:45:05 AM |
- | Type | Value[x] |
* | collected specimen (Details ) | Specimen/101 |
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.