This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v1.0.2: DSTU 2). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
General Condition Example (id = "example")
<Conformance xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> <id value="example"/> <text> <status value="generated"/> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>The EHR Server supports the following transactions for the resource Person: read, vread, update, history, search(name,gender), create and updates.</p> <p>The EHR System supports the following message: admin-notify::Person.</p> <p>The EHR Application has a <a href="http://fhir.hl7.org/base/Profilebc054d23-75e1-4dc6-aca5-838b6b1ac81d/_history/b5fdd9fc-b021-4ea1-911 a-721a60663796">general document profile</a>. </p> </div> </text> <!-- the identifier for this conformance statement. The identifier and version establish identifiers that other specifications etc.may use to refer to the conformance statement that this resource represents in a logical manner rather than in a literal (URL) fashion The identifier should be globally unique - a UUID, an OID, or a URL/URI --> <url value="68D043B5-9ECF-4559-A57A-396E0D452311"/> <version value="20130510"/> <name value="ACME EHR Conformance statement"/> <status value="draft"/> <experimental value="true"/> <publisher value="ACME Corporation"/> <contact> <name value="System Administrator"/> <telecom> <system value="email"/> <value value="wile@acme.org"/> </telecom> </contact> <date value="2012-01-04"/> <description value="This is the FHIR conformance statement for the main EHR at ACME for the private interface - it does not describe the public interface"/> <requirements value="Main EHR conformance statement, published for contracting and operational support"/> <copyright value="Copyright © Acme Healthcare and GoodCorp EHR Systems"/> <kind value="instance"/> <software> <name value="EHR"/> <version value="0.00.020.2134"/> <releaseDate value="2012-01-04"/> </software> <implementation> <description value="main EHR at ACME"/> <url value="http://10.2.3.4/fhir"/> </implementation> <!-- while the FHIR infrastructure is turning over prior to development, a version is required. Note that this may be rescinded later? --> <fhirVersion value="1.0.0"/> <!-- this system accepts unknown content in the resources --> <acceptUnknown value="both"/> <!-- this system can do either xml or json. (Listing both implies full support for either, with interconversion) --> <format value="xml"/> <format value="json"/> <!-- in a real conformance statement, it's unlikely that a single conformance statement would declare conformance for REST, messaging and documents, though it is legal. This example does so in order to show all the parts of a conformance statement --> <rest> <!-- this is a server conformance statement. Note that servers are required to provide one of these. It can easily be edited by hand - copy this, replace the metadata above, delete the messaging and document stuff below, and then replace the details appropriately. --> <mode value="server"/> <documentation value="Main FHIR endpoint for acem health"/> <security> <!-- cors support is highly recommended - mandatory if using SMART on FHIR --> <cors value="true"/> <service> <coding> <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/restful-security-service"/> <code value="SMART-on-FHIR"/> </coding> </service> <description value="See Smart on FHIR documentation"/> <certificate> <type value="application/jwt"/> <!-- base JWT. this blob is not valid --> <blob value="IHRoaXMgYmxvYiBpcyBub3QgdmFsaWQ="/> </certificate> </security> <!-- zero or more of these - declaration of support for a resource --> <resource> <type value="Patient"/> <!-- let's assume that HL7 has stood up a profile registry at http://fhir.hl7.org/fhir - it's likely to have a registry, though this is not decided, nor is a URL decided. This application simply uses a profile registered directly with HL7. For the simplest case of a FHIR REST Server, just delete this profile reference. Profile references do not need to be a UUID, though a profile registry could insist that they are --> <profile> <reference value="http://fhir.hl7.org/base/Profile7896271d-57f6-4231-89dc-dcc91eab2416"/> </profile> <interaction> <code value="read"/> </interaction> <interaction> <code value="vread"/> <documentation value="Only supported for patient records since 12-Dec 2012"/> </interaction> <interaction> <code value="update"/> </interaction> <interaction> <code value="history-instance"/> </interaction> <interaction> <code value="create"/> </interaction> <interaction> <code value="history-type"/> </interaction> <versioning value="versioned-update"/> <readHistory value="true"/> <!-- this server doesn't let the clients create identities --> <updateCreate value="false"/> <!-- it's good to support conditional create on patients; this solves a common middleware problem --> <conditionalCreate value="true"/> <conditionalUpdate value="false"/><!-- 0..1 If allows/uses conditional update --> <conditionalDelete value="not-supported"/> <searchInclude value="Organization"/> <searchRevInclude value="Person"/> <searchParam> <name value="identifier"/> <definition value="http://hl7.org/fhir/SearchParameter/Patient-identifier"/> <type value="token"/> <documentation value="Only supports search by institution MRN"/> <modifier value="missing"/> </searchParam> <searchParam> <name value="careprovider"/> <definition value="http://hl7.org/fhir/SearchParameter/Patient-careprovider"/> <type value="reference"/> <!-- there's not a lot of value in saying this, since it's the only choice anyway. but in other cases it's pretty important --> <target value="Organization"/> <modifier value="missing"/> <chain value="name"/> <chain value="identifier"/> </searchParam> </resource> <interaction> <code value="transaction"/> </interaction> <interaction> <code value="history-system"/> </interaction> <compartment value="http://hl7.org/fhir/compartment/Patient"/> </rest> <!-- a messaging conformance statement. Applications are not required to make a conformance statement with regard to messaging, though there is active argument that they should. --> <messaging> <endpoint> <protocol> <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/message-transport"/> <code value="mllp"/> </protocol> <!-- LLP server at 10.1.1.10 on port 9234 --> <address value="mllp:10.1.1.10:9234"/> </endpoint> <reliableCache value="30"/> <documentation value="ADT A08 equivalent for external system notifications"/> <event> <code> <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/message-type"/> <code value="admin-notify"/> </code> <category value="Consequence"/> <!-- this a receiver - i.e. answers. Not neccessariy a server (though this is) --> <mode value="receiver"/> <focus value="Patient"/> <!-- specify a profile for the request person. Very often there's no point profiling the response, it's not interesting --> <request> <reference value="StructureDefinition/daf-patient"/> </request> <response> <reference value="StructureDefinition/MessageHeader"/> </response> <documentation value="Notification of an update to a patient resource. changing the links is not supported"/> </event> </messaging> <!-- a document conformance statement --> <document> <mode value="consumer"/> <documentation value="Basic rules for all documents in the EHR system"/> <!-- this is the important element: a reference to a published document profile note that this is a version specific reference. --> <profile> <reference value="http://fhir.hl7.org/base/Profilebc054d23-75e1-4dc6-aca5-838b6b1ac81d/_history/b5fdd9fc-b021-4ea1-911 a-721a60663796"/> </profile> </document> </Conformance>
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.