This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v0.0.82: DSTU 1). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
Definitions for the xds-documentmanifest Profile.
DocumentManifest(DocumentManifest) | |
Definition | A manifest that defines a set of documents. |
Control | 1..1 |
Type | DocumentManifest |
DocumentManifest.id | |
Definition | The logical id of the resource, as used in the url for the resoure. Once assigned, this value never changes. |
Control | 0..1 |
Type | id |
Comments | The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation. Bundles always have an id, though it is usually a generated UUID. |
DocumentManifest.meta | |
Definition | The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content may not always be associated with version changes to the resource. |
Control | 0..1 |
Type | Meta |
DocumentManifest.implicitRules | |
Definition | A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. |
Control | 0..1 |
Type | uri |
Is Modifier | true |
Comments | Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element as much as possible. |
DocumentManifest.language | |
Definition | The base language in which the resource is written. |
Control | 0..1 |
Binding | A human language The codes SHALL be taken from http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47 |
Type | code |
Comments | Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute). |
DocumentManifest.text | |
Definition | A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource, and may be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety. |
Control | 0..1 This element is affected by the following invariants: dom-1 |
Type | Narrative |
Alternate Names | narrative, html, xhtml, display |
Comments | Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. |
DocumentManifest.contained | |
Definition | These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope. |
Control | 0..* |
Type | Resource |
Alternate Names | inline resources, anonymous resources, contained resources |
Comments | This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. |
DocumentManifest.extension | |
Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* |
Type | Extension |
Alternate Names | extensions, user content |
Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
DocumentManifest.modifierExtension | |
Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource, and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. |
Control | 0..* |
Type | Extension |
Alternate Names | extensions, user content |
Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
DocumentManifest.masterIdentifier | |
Definition | A single identifier that uniquely identifies this manifest. Principally used to refer to the manifest in non-FHIR contexts. |
Control | 0..1 |
Type | Identifier |
DocumentManifest.identifier | |
Definition | A globally unique identifier for the SubmissionSet assigned by the creating entity. |
Control | 1..1 |
Type | Identifier |
DocumentManifest.subject | |
Definition | the subject of care whose longitudinal record is being reflected in this SubmissionSet. |
Control | 1..* |
Type | Reference (Patient)) |
DocumentManifest.recipient | |
Definition | The organization(s) or person(s) for whom the SubmissionSet is intended. |
Control | 0..* |
Type | Choice of: Reference (Patient)), Reference (Practitioner)), Reference (Organization)) |
Comments | How the recipient receives the document set or is notified of it is up to the implementation. This element is just a statement of intent. |
DocumentManifest.type | |
Definition | The code specifying the type of clinical activity that resulted in placing the documents in this SubmissionSet. |
Control | 0..1 |
Binding | Precice type of clinical document The codes SHOULD be taken from Document Type Value Set |
Type | CodeableConcept |
DocumentManifest.author | |
Definition | The humans and/or machines that authored the document in the SubmissionSet. This attribute contains the sub-attributes: authorInstitution, authorPerson, authorRole, authorSpecialty. |
Control | 1..* |
Type | Choice of: Reference (Practitioner)), Reference (Device)) |
Comments | Not necessarily who did the actual data entry (i.e. typist) or who was the source (informant). |
DocumentManifest.created | |
Definition | Point in time at the creating entity when the SubmissionSet was created. |
Control | 0..1 |
Type | dateTime |
Comments | Creation time is used for tracking, organizing versions and searching. This is the creation time of the document set, not the documents on which it is based. |
DocumentManifest.source | |
Definition | OID identifying the instance of the creating entity that contributed the SubmissionSet. |
Control | 0..1 |
Type | uri |
DocumentManifest.status | |
Definition | The lifecycle status of the SubmissionSet. |
Control | 1..1 |
Binding | The status of the document reference The codes SHALL be taken from DocumentReferenceStatus |
Type | code |
Is Modifier | true |
DocumentManifest.description | |
Definition | Human-readable description of the source document. This is sometimes known as the "title". |
Control | 0..1 |
Type | string |
Requirements | Helps humans to assess whether the document is of interest. |
Comments | What the document is about, rather than a terse summary of the document. It is commonly the case that records do not have a title and are collectively referred to by the display name of Record code (e.g. a "consultation" or "progress note"). |
DocumentManifest.content | |
Definition | The list of resources that describe the parts of this document reference. Usually, these would be document references, but direct references to binary attachments and images are also allowed. |
Control | 1..* |
Type | Reference (DocumentReference)) |
DocumentManifest.related | |
Definition | Related identifiers or resources associated with the DocumentManifest. |
Control | 0..* |
Type | null |
Comments | May be identifiers or resources that caused the DocumentManifest to be created. |
DocumentManifest.related.id | |
Definition | unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). |
Control | 0..1 |
Type | id |
DocumentManifest.related.extension | |
Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. |
Control | 0..* |
Type | Extension |
Alternate Names | extensions, user content |
Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
DocumentManifest.related.modifierExtension | |
Definition | May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element, and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. |
Control | 0..* |
Type | Extension |
Alternate Names | extensions, user content, modifiers |
Comments | There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone. |
DocumentManifest.related.identifier | |
Definition | Related identifier to this DocumentManifest. If both id and ref are present they shall refer to the same thing. |
Control | 0..1 |
Type | Identifier |
Comments | Order numbers, accession numbers, XDW workflow numbers. |
DocumentManifest.related.ref | |
Definition | Related Resource to this DocumentManifest. If both id and ref are present they shall refer to the same thing. |
Control | 0..1 |
Type | Reference (Resource)) |
Comments | Order, DiagnosticOrder, Procedure, EligibilityRequest, etc. |