This is Snapshot #3 for FHIR R5, released to support Connectathon 32. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions.
Financial Management Work Group | Maturity Level: N/A | Standards Status: Informative | Compartments: Not linked to any defined compartments |
Raw Turtle (+ also see Turtle/RDF Format Specification)
ConsentDirective Example
@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> . @prefix loinc: <http://loinc.org/rdf#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . # - resource ------------------------------------------------------------------- # not bound by a timeframe - Contract.applies [a fhir:Contract; fhir:nodeRole fhir:treeRoot; fhir:Resource.id [ fhir:value "pcd-example-notThem"]; # fhir:DomainResource.text [ fhir:Narrative.status [ fhir:value "generated" ]; fhir:Narrative.div "<div xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\">The following scenario is based on existing\n jurisdictional policy and are realized in existing systems in Canada. The default policy is\n one of implied consent for the provision of care, so these scenarios all deal with withdrawal\n or withholding consent for that purpose. In other jurisdictions, where an express consent\n model is used (Opt-In), these would examples would contain the phrase "consent to" rather than\n "withhold" or "withdraw" consent for. <p> specific to use-case 4) Withhold or withdraw consent\n for disclosure to a specific provider agent (an individual within an organization) </p><p>\n Patient "P. van de Heuvel" ex-spouse, Bill T Lookafter is a Nurse that is employed by Good\n Health Hospital. P. realizes that she may receive treatment at GHH, however she does not\n want her ex-spouse to have any access to her IIHI. She indicates that she would like to\n withdraw/withhold consent to disclose any instance of her health information to her\n ex-spouse as a result of his employment at Good Health Clinic. </p>\n </div>" ]; # fhir:Contract.issued [ fhir:value "2015-11-18"^^xsd:date]; # fhir:Contract.subject [ fhir:index 0; fhir:Reference.reference [ fhir:value "Patient/f001" ]; fhir:Reference.display [ fhir:value "P. van de Heuvel" ] ]; # fhir:Contract.authority [ fhir:index 0; fhir:Reference.reference [ fhir:value "Organization/3" ]; fhir:Reference.display [ fhir:value "Michigan Health" ] ]; # fhir:Contract.domain [ fhir:index 0; fhir:Reference.reference [ fhir:value "Location/ukp" ]; fhir:Reference.display [ fhir:value "UK Pharmacies" ] ]; # and/or would this [also] go into Contract.domain as a Jurisdiction?? (see the example on UK Pharamacy Juristiction) fhir:Contract.type [ fhir:CodeableConcept.coding [ fhir:index 0; a loinc:57016-8; fhir:Coding.system [ fhir:value "http://loinc.org" ]; fhir:Coding.code [ fhir:value "57016-8" ] ] ]; # fhir:Contract.subType [ fhir:index 0; fhir:CodeableConcept.coding [ fhir:index 0; fhir:Coding.system [ fhir:value "http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca.org/Consent-subtype-codes" ]; fhir:Coding.code [ fhir:value "Opt-In" ]; fhir:Coding.display [ fhir:value "Default Authorization with exceptions." ] ] ]; # made up code-system to represent the set of privacy consent sub-types known and published by Canada Infoway fhir:Contract.term [ fhir:index 0; fhir:Contract.term.type [ fhir:CodeableConcept.coding [ fhir:index 0; fhir:Coding.system [ fhir:value "http://example.org/fhir/consent-term-type-codes" ]; # made up code system fhir:Coding.code [ fhir:value "withhold-from" ]; fhir:Coding.display [ fhir:value "Withhold all data from specified actor entity." ] ] ]; fhir:Contract.term.offer [ fhir:Contract.term.offer.topic [ fhir:Reference.reference [ fhir:value "Practitioner/f204" ]; fhir:Reference.display [ fhir:value "Fictive Nurse" ] ]; fhir:Contract.term.offer.text [ fhir:value "Withhold this order and any results or related objects from specified nurse provider." ] ] ]; # fhir:Contract.signer [ fhir:index 0; fhir:Contract.signer.type [ fhir:Coding.system [ fhir:value "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/contractsignertypecodes" ]; fhir:Coding.code [ fhir:value "COVPTY" ] ]; fhir:Contract.signer.party [ fhir:Reference.reference [ fhir:value "Patient/f001" ] ]; fhir:Contract.signer.signature [ fhir:index 0; fhir:Signature.type [ fhir:index 0; fhir:Coding.system [ fhir:value "urn:iso-astm:E1762-95:2013" ]; fhir:Coding.code [ fhir:value "1.2.840.10065.1.12.1.1" ] ]; fhir:Signature.when [ fhir:value "2013-06-08T10:57:34-07:00"^^xsd:dateTime ]; fhir:Signature.who [ fhir:Reference.reference [ fhir:value "Patient/f001" ] ] ] ]; # fhir:Contract.friendly [ fhir:index 0; fhir:Contract.friendly.contentAttachment [ fhir:Attachment.title [ fhir:value "The terms of the consent in friendly consumer speak." ] ] # likely use url pointer to common text ]; # the terms of the consent in friendly consumer speak fhir:Contract.legal [ fhir:index 0; fhir:Contract.legal.contentAttachment [ fhir:Attachment.title [ fhir:value "The terms of the consent in lawyer speak." ] ] # likely use url pointer to common text , I think some think that this should be the pointer to the law by which this consent is derived under. Such as http:\/\/lois-laws.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/P-21\/index.html ]] . # the legal terms of the consent in lawyer speak # - ontology header ------------------------------------------------------------ [a owl:Ontology; owl:imports fhir:fhir.ttl] . # -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.
FHIR ®© HL7.org 2011+. FHIR R5 Ballot hl7.fhir.core#5.0.0-snapshot3 generated on Wed, Dec 14, 2022 07:16+1100.
Links: Search |
Version History |
Contents |
Glossary |
QA |
Compare to R4B |
Compare to R5 Draft |
|
Propose a change