Release 5 Ballot

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v5.0.0-ballot: FHIR R5 Ballot Preview). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4

Example PlanDefinition/opioidcds-07 (Narrative)

Clinical Decision Support Work GroupMaturity Level: N/AStandards Status: InformativeCompartments: Not linked to any defined compartments

This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML, JSON or Turtle format. This example conforms to the profile PlanDefinition.


Generated Narrative: PlanDefinition

Resource PlanDefinition "opioidcds-07"

url: http://hl7.org/fhir/ig/opioid-cds/PlanDefinition/opioidcds-07

identifier: id: urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.11.6, id: cdc-opioid-guidance (OFFICIAL)

version: 0.1.0

name: cdc-opioid-07

title: CDC Opioid Prescribing Guideline Recommendation #7

type: ECA Rule (PlanDefinitionType#eca-rule)

status: draft

date: 2018-03-19

publisher: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

description: Clinicians should evaluate benefits and harms with patients within 1 to 4 weeks of starting opioid therapy for chronic pain or of dose escalation. Clinicians should evaluate benefits and harms of continued therapy with patients every 3 months or more frequently.

UseContexts

-CodeValue[x]
*Clinical Focus (Details: http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/usage-context-type code focus = 'Clinical Focus', stated as 'Clinical Focus')Medication requested (situation) (SNOMED CT#182888003)
*Clinical Focus (Details: http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/usage-context-type code focus = 'Clinical Focus', stated as 'Clinical Focus')Chronic pain (finding) (SNOMED CT#82423001)

jurisdiction: United States of America (unknown#US)

purpose: CDC’s Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain is intended to improve communication between providers and patients about the risks and benefits of opioid therapy for chronic pain, improve the safety and effectiveness of pain treatment, and reduce the risks associated with long-term opioid therapy, including opioid use disorder and overdose. The Guideline is not intended for patients who are in active cancer treatment, palliative care, or end-of-life care.

usage: If benefits do not outweigh harms of continued opioid therapy, clinicians should optimize other therapies and work with patients to taper opioids to lower dosages or to taper and discontinue opioids.

copyright: © CDC 2016+.

topic: Opioid Prescribing ()

author: Kensaku Kawamoto, MD, PhD, MHS: , Bryn Rhodes: , Floyd Eisenberg, MD, MPH: , Robert McClure, MD, MPH:

relatedArtifact

type: documentation

display: CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain

relatedArtifact

type: documentation

display: MME Conversion Tables

library: http://example.org/fhir/Library/opioidcds-recommendation-07

action

title: Existing patient should be evaluated for risk of continued opioid therapy.

description: Checking if the trigger prescription meets the inclusion criteria for recommendation #7 workflow.

documentation

type: documentation

Triggers

-TypeName
*named-eventmedication-prescribe

condition

kind: applicability

Expressions

-DescriptionLanguageExpression
*Check whether the existing patient, without an end of life condition or risk assessment in the past 90 days, has taken an opioid-with-abuse-potential for 7 of the past 10 days or 63 of the past 90 days.text/cqlInclusion Criteria

groupingBehavior: visual-group

selectionBehavior: exactly-one

dynamicValue

path: action.title

Expressions

-LanguageExpression
*text/cqlGet Summary

dynamicValue

path: action.description

Expressions

-LanguageExpression
*text/cqlGet Detail

dynamicValue

path: action.extension

Expressions

-LanguageExpression
*text/cqlGet Indicator

Actions

-Description
*Will schedule assessment of risk for opioid use for the patient
*Risk of overdose carefully considered and outweighed by benefit; snooze 3 mo
*N/A - see comment; snooze 3 mo

 

 

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.