This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v4.3.0-snapshot1: Release 4B Snapshot #1). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3 R2
Patient Care Work Group | Maturity Level: N/A | Standards Status: Informative | Compartments: Encounter, Patient, Practitioner, RelatedPerson |
Raw XML (canonical form + also see XML Format Specification)
Real-word condition example (Bacterial Infection) (id = "f205")
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <Condition xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> <id value="f205"/> <text> <status value="generated"/> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p> <b> Generated Narrative</b> </p> <div> <p> Resource "f205" </p> </div> <p> <b> clinicalStatus</b> : Active <span> (<a> Condition Clinical Status Codes</a> #active)</span> </p> <p> <b> verificationStatus</b> : Differential <span> (<a> ConditionVerificationStatus</a> #differential)</span> </p> <p> <b> code</b> : Bacterial infectious disease <span> (<a> SNOMED CT</a> #87628006)</span> </p> <p> <b> subject</b> : <a> Patient/f201: Roel</a> "Roel"</p> <p> <b> recordedDate</b> : 2013-04-04</p> <p> <b> asserter</b> : <a> Practitioner/f201</a> "Dokter Bronsig"</p> </div> </text> <clinicalStatus> <coding> <system value="http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-clinical"/> <code value="active"/> </coding> </clinicalStatus> <verificationStatus> <coding> <system value="http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/condition-ver-status"/> <code value="differential"/> </coding> </verificationStatus> <code> <!-- The problem is a bacterial infection --> <coding> <system value="http://snomed.info/sct"/> <code value="87628006"/> <display value="Bacterial infectious disease"/> </coding> </code> <subject> <reference value="Patient/f201"/> <display value="Roel"/> </subject> <recordedDate value="2013-04-04"/> <asserter> <reference value="Practitioner/f201"/> </asserter> </Condition>
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.