This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v5.0.0-ballot: R5 Ballot - see ballot notes). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4
Security Work Group | Maturity Level: 0 | Informative | Use Context: Any |
This is a value set defined by the FHIR project.
Summary
Defining URL: | http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/provenance-history-agent-type |
Version: | 5.0.0-ballot |
Name: | ProvenanceEventHistoryAgentRoleCodes |
Title: | Provenance Event History Agent Role Codes |
Status: | draft |
Definition: | Types of roles indicating how a particular agent was involved with the creation or modification of a resource for use when exposing event history |
Committee: | Security Work Group |
OID: | 2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.3.927 (for OID based terminology systems) |
Flags: |
This value set is used in the following places:
http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType
Code | Display | Definition |
AUT | Author | **Definition:** A party that originates the Act and therefore has responsibility for the information given in the Act and ownership of this Act. **Example:** the report writer, the person writing the act definition, the guideline author, the placer of an order, the EKG cart (device) creating a report etc. Every Act should have an author. Authorship is regardless of mood always actual authorship. Examples of such policies might include: * The author and anyone they explicitly delegate may update the report; * All administrators within the same clinic may cancel and reschedule appointments created by other administrators within that clinic; A party that is neither an author nor a party who is extended authorship maintenance rights by policy, may only amend, reverse, override, replace, or follow up in other ways on this Act, whereby the Act remains intact and is linked to another Act authored by that other party. |
INF | Informant | A source of reported information (e.g., a next of kin who answers questions about the patient's history). For history questions, the patient is logically an informant, yet the informant of history questions is implicitly the subject. |
VRF | Verifier | A person who verifies the correctness and appropriateness of the service (plan, order, event, etc.) and hence takes on accountability. |
ENT | Data Enterer | A person entering the data into the originating system. The data entry person is collected optionally for internal quality control purposes. This includes the transcriptionist for dictated text. |
See the full registry of value sets defined as part of FHIR.
Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:
Lvl | A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. For value sets, levels are mostly used to organize codes for user convenience, but may follow code system hierarchy - see Code System for further information |
Source | The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere) |
Code | The code (used as the code in the resource instance). If the code is in italics, this indicates that the code is not selectable ('Abstract') |
Display | The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application |
Definition | An explanation of the meaning of the concept |
Comments | Additional notes about how to use the code |