This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v5.0.0-ballot: R5 Ballot - see ballot notes). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B
Clinical Decision Support Work Group | Maturity Level: 1 | Trial Use | Use Context: Not yet ready for Production use, Not yet ready for Production use |
This is a value set defined by the FHIR project.
Summary
Defining URL: | http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/certainty-rating |
Version: | 5.0.0-ballot |
Name: | EvidenceCertaintyRating |
Title: | EvidenceCertaintyRating |
Status: | draft |
Definition: | The assessment of quality, confidence, or certainty. |
Committee: | Clinical Decision Support Work Group |
OID: | 2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.3.3049 (for OID based terminology systems) |
Flags: | Experimental, Immutable |
This value set is used in the following places:
http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating
This expansion generated 10 Sep 2022
This value set contains 16 concepts
Expansion based on EvidenceCertaintyRating v5.0.0-ballot (CodeSystem)
Code | System | Display | Definition |
high | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | High quality | High quality evidence. |
moderate | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | Moderate quality | Moderate quality evidence. |
low | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | Low quality | Low quality evidence. |
very-low | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | Very low quality | Very low quality evidence. |
no-concern | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | no serious concern | no serious concern. |
serious-concern | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | serious concern | serious concern. |
very-serious-concern | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | very serious concern | very serious concern. |
extremely-serious-concern | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | extremely serious concern | extremely serious concern. |
present | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | present | possible reason for increasing quality rating was checked and found to be present. |
absent | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | absent | possible reason for increasing quality rating was checked and found to be absent. |
no-change | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | no change to rating | no change to quality rating. |
downcode1 | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | reduce rating: -1 | reduce quality rating by 1. |
downcode2 | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | reduce rating: -2 | reduce quality rating by 2. |
downcode3 | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | reduce rating: -3 | reduce quality rating by 3. |
upcode1 | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | increase rating: +1 | increase quality rating by 1. |
upcode2 | http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating | increase rating: +2 | increase quality rating by 2. |
See the full registry of value sets defined as part of FHIR.
Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:
Lvl | A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. For value sets, levels are mostly used to organize codes for user convenience, but may follow code system hierarchy - see Code System for further information |
Source | The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere) |
Code | The code (used as the code in the resource instance). If the code is in italics, this indicates that the code is not selectable ('Abstract') |
Display | The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application |
Definition | An explanation of the meaning of the concept |
Comments | Additional notes about how to use the code |