Release 5 Ballot

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v5.0.0-ballot: R5 Ballot - see ballot notes). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B

4.4.1.20 ValueSet http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/certainty-rating

Clinical Decision Support icon Work Group Maturity Level: 1Trial Use Use Context: Not yet ready for Production use, Not yet ready for Production use

This is a value set defined by the FHIR project.

Summary

Defining URL:http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/certainty-rating
Version:5.0.0-ballot
Name:EvidenceCertaintyRating
Title:EvidenceCertaintyRating
Status:draft
Definition:

The assessment of quality, confidence, or certainty.

Committee:Clinical Decision Support icon Work Group
OID:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.3.3049 (for OID based terminology systems)
Flags:Experimental, Immutable

This value set is used in the following places:


 

This expansion generated 10 Sep 2022


This value set contains 16 concepts

Expansion based on EvidenceCertaintyRating v5.0.0-ballot (CodeSystem)

CodeSystemDisplayDefinition
  highhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingHigh quality

High quality evidence.

  moderatehttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingModerate quality

Moderate quality evidence.

  lowhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingLow quality

Low quality evidence.

  very-lowhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingVery low quality

Very low quality evidence.

  no-concernhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingno serious concern

no serious concern.

  serious-concernhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingserious concern

serious concern.

  very-serious-concernhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingvery serious concern

very serious concern.

  extremely-serious-concernhttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingextremely serious concern

extremely serious concern.

  presenthttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingpresent

possible reason for increasing quality rating was checked and found to be present.

  absenthttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingabsent

possible reason for increasing quality rating was checked and found to be absent.

  no-changehttp://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingno change to rating

no change to quality rating.

  downcode1http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingreduce rating: -1

reduce quality rating by 1.

  downcode2http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingreduce rating: -2

reduce quality rating by 2.

  downcode3http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingreduce rating: -3

reduce quality rating by 3.

  upcode1http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingincrease rating: +1

increase quality rating by 1.

  upcode2http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-ratingincrease rating: +2

increase quality rating by 2.

 

See the full registry of value sets defined as part of FHIR.


Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:

LvlA few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. For value sets, levels are mostly used to organize codes for user convenience, but may follow code system hierarchy - see Code System for further information
SourceThe source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere)
CodeThe code (used as the code in the resource instance). If the code is in italics, this indicates that the code is not selectable ('Abstract')
DisplayThe display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application
DefinitionAn explanation of the meaning of the concept
CommentsAdditional notes about how to use the code