Operation-structuredefinition-questionnaire

Release 5 Ballot

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v5.0.0-ballot: R5 Ballot - see ballot notes). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3 R2

Example OperationDefinition/StructureDefinition-questionnaire (Narrative)

FHIR Infrastructure Work Group

Maturity Level: N/A

Standards Status: Informative

Compartments: Not linked to any defined compartments

This is the narrative for the resource. See also the XML, JSON or Turtle format.

Note that this is the formal definition for the questionnaire operation as an OperationDefinition on StructureDefinition. See the Operation documentation

URL: [base]/StructureDefinition/$questionnaire

URL: [base]/StructureDefinition/[id]/$questionnaire

Parameters

Use

Name

Cardinality

Type

Binding

Documentation

IN

identifier

0..1

Identifier

A logical identifier (i.e. 'StructureDefinition.identifier''). The server must know the StructureDefinition or be able to retrieve it from other known repositories.

IN

profile

0..1

StructureDefinition

The StructureDefinition is provided directly as part of the request. Servers may choose not to accept profiles in this fashion

IN

url

0..1

canonical

The StructureDefinition's official URL (i.e. 'StructureDefinition.url'). The server must know the StructureDefinition or be able to retrieve it from other known repositories.

IN

supportedOnly

0..1

boolean

If true, the questionnaire will only include those elements marked as "mustSupport='true'" in the StructureDefinition.

OUT

return

1..1

Questionnaire

The questionnaire form generated based on the StructureDefinition.

Open Issue: Ideally, extensions should be populated in the generated Questionnaire that will support taking QuestionnaireResponse resources generated from the Questionnaire and turning them back into the appropriate resources.

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.