This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v4.6.0: R5 Draft Ballot). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B
Clinical Decision Support Work Group | Maturity Level: N/A | Standards Status: Informative |
Raw JSON (canonical form + also see JSON Format Specification)
Definition for Code System EvidenceCertaintyRating
{ "resourceType" : "CodeSystem", "id" : "certainty-rating", "meta" : { "lastUpdated" : "2021-04-15T13:25:09.461+11:00", "profile" : ["http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/shareablecodesystem"] }, "text" : { "status" : "generated", "div" : "<div>!-- Snipped for Brevity --></div>" }, "extension" : [{ "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg", "valueCode" : "cds" }, { "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-standards-status", "valueCode" : "trial-use" }, { "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-fmm", "valueInteger" : 1 }], "url" : "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/certainty-rating", "identifier" : [{ "system" : "urn:ietf:rfc:3986", "value" : "urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.1.1415" }], "version" : "4.6.0", "name" : "EvidenceCertaintyRating", "title" : "EvidenceCertaintyRating", "status" : "draft", "experimental" : false, "date" : "2020-12-28T16:55:11+11:00", "publisher" : "HL7 (FHIR Project)", "contact" : [{ "telecom" : [{ "system" : "url", "value" : "http://hl7.org/fhir" }, { "system" : "email", "value" : "fhir@lists.hl7.org" }] }], "description" : "The assessment of quality, confidence, or certainty.", "caseSensitive" : true, "valueSet" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/certainty-rating", "content" : "complete", "concept" : [{ "code" : "high", "display" : "High quality", "definition" : "High quality evidence." }, { "code" : "moderate", "display" : "Moderate quality", "definition" : "Moderate quality evidence." }, { "code" : "low", "display" : "Low quality", "definition" : "Low quality evidence." }, { "code" : "very-low", "display" : "Very low quality", "definition" : "Very low quality evidence." }, { "code" : "no-concern", "display" : "no serious concern", "definition" : "no serious concern." }, { "code" : "serious-concern", "display" : "serious concern", "definition" : "serious concern." }, { "code" : "very-serious-concern", "display" : "very serious concern", "definition" : "very serious concern." }, { "code" : "extremely-serious-concern", "display" : "extremely serious concern", "definition" : "extremely serious concern." }, { "code" : "present", "display" : "present", "definition" : "possible reason for increasing quality rating was checked and found to be present." }, { "code" : "absent", "display" : "absent", "definition" : "possible reason for increasing quality rating was checked and found to be absent." }, { "code" : "no-change", "display" : "no change to rating", "definition" : "no change to quality rating." }, { "code" : "downcode1", "display" : "reduce rating: -1", "definition" : "reduce quality rating by 1." }, { "code" : "downcode2", "display" : "reduce rating: -2", "definition" : "reduce quality rating by 2." }, { "code" : "downcode3", "display" : "reduce rating: -3", "definition" : "reduce quality rating by 3." }, { "code" : "upcode1", "display" : "increase rating: +1", "definition" : "increase quality rating by 1." }, { "code" : "upcode2", "display" : "increase rating: +2", "definition" : "increase quality rating by 2." }] }
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.