R4 Ballot #2 (Mixed Normative/Trial use)

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v3.5.0: R4 Ballot #2). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3

Substance-example-f202-staphylococcus.ttl

Orders and Observations Work GroupMaturity Level: N/ABallot Status: InformativeCompartments: Not linked to any defined compartments

Raw Turtle (+ also see Turtle/RDF Format Specification)

Staphylococcus Example

@prefix fhir: <http://hl7.org/fhir/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix sct: <http://snomed.info/id/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

# - resource -------------------------------------------------------------------

<http://hl7.org/fhir/Substance/f202> a fhir:Substance;
  fhir:nodeRole fhir:treeRoot;
  fhir:Resource.id [ fhir:value "f202"];
  fhir:DomainResource.text [
     fhir:Narrative.status [ fhir:value "generated" ];
     fhir:Narrative.div "<div xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><p><b>Generated Narrative with Details</b></p><p><b>id</b>: f202</p><p><b>code</b>: Staphylococcus Aureus <span>(Details : {SNOMED CT code '3092008' = 'Staphylococcus aureus', given as 'Staphylococcus Aureus'})</span></p></div>"
  ];
  fhir:Substance.code [
     fhir:CodeableConcept.coding [
       fhir:index 0;
       a sct:3092008;
       fhir:Coding.system [ fhir:value "http://snomed.info/sct" ];
       fhir:Coding.code [ fhir:value "3092008" ];
       fhir:Coding.display [ fhir:value "Staphylococcus Aureus" ]
     ]
  ] .

# - ontology header ------------------------------------------------------------

<http://hl7.org/fhir/Substance/f202.ttl> a owl:Ontology;
  owl:imports fhir:fhir.ttl;
  owl:versionIRI <http://build.fhir.org/Substance/f202.ttl> .

# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.