R4 Ballot #1 (Mixed Normative/Trial use)

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v3.3.0: R4 Ballot 2). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R5 R4B R4 R3

Consent-example-Out.xml

Community Based Collaborative Care Work GroupMaturity Level: N/ABallot Status: InformativeCompartments: Patient

Raw XML (canonical form)

Jump past Narrative

Consent withholding access (id = "consent-example-Out")

<Consent xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
  <id value="consent-example-Out"/> 
  <text> 
    <status value="generated"/> 
    <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The following scenario is based on existing jurisdictional policy and are realized in
       existing systems in Canada. 
  The default policy is one of implied consent for the provision of care, so these scenarios
       all deal with withdrawal or withholding consent for that purpose. 
  In other jurisdictions, where an express consent model is used (Opt-In), these would
       examples would contain the phrase &quot;consent to&quot; rather 
  than &quot;withhold&quot; or &quot;withdraw&quot; consent for.
    <p> 
  Specific to use-case 0) Withhold Authorization of sharing data for Treatment
  </p> <p> 
    Patient &quot;P. van de Heuvel&quot; wishes to have no data at the Good Health Psychiatric
         Hospital 
   available for normal treatment use.
   </p> 
   </div> 
  </text> 
  <status value="in-progress"/> 
  <scope> 
    <coding> 
      <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/consentscope"/> 
      <code value="patient-privacy"/> 
    </coding> 
    </scope> 
      <category> 
    <coding> 
      <system value="http://loinc.org"/> 
      <code value="59284-0"/> 
    </coding> 
  </category> 
  <patient> 
    <reference value="Patient/f001"/> 
    <display value="P. van de Heuvel"/> 
  </patient> 
  <dateTime value="2015-11-18"/> 
  <!--   not bound by a timeframe - Consent.period   -->
  <!--   I assume the example given is Canada Infoway wide???  AND I assume it is desired to
   state that in the Consent.authority element   -->
  <organization> 
    <reference value="Organization/f001"/> 
  </organization> 
  <!--   the text terms of the consent in lawyer speak   -->
  <sourceAttachment> 
    <title value="The terms of the consent in lawyer speak."/> 
    <!--   likely use url pointer to common text   -->
  </sourceAttachment> 
  <!--   this is opt-out - e.g. everything approved unless otherwise stated   -->
  <policyRule> 
    <coding> 
      <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/v3/ActCode"/> 
      <code value="OPTOUT"/> 
    </coding> 
  </policyRule> 
  <provision> 
    <actor> 
      <role> 
        <coding> 
          <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/v3/ParticipationType"/> 
          <code value="CST"/> 
        </coding> 
      </role> 
      <reference> 
        <reference value="Organization/f001"/> 
      </reference> 
    </actor> 
  </provision> 
</Consent> 

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.