This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v3.2.0: R4 Ballot 1). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R3 R2
US Realm Taskforce Work Group | Maturity Level: 0 | Informative | Use Context: Not Intended for Production use |
This is a value set defined by the FHIR project.
Summary
Defining URL: | http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/usps-state |
Name: | USPS Two Letter Alphabetic Codes |
Definition: | This value set defines two letter USPS alphabetic codes. |
Committee: | US Realm Taskforce Work Group |
OID: | 2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.3.41 (for OID based terminology systems) |
Copyright: | On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department implemented the five-digit ZIP Code, which was placed after the state name in the last line of an address. To provide room for the ZIP Code, the Department issued two-letter abbreviations for all states and territories. Publication 59, Abbreviations for Use with ZIP Code, issued by the Department in October 1963. Currently there is no copyright restriction on this value set. |
Source Resource | XML / JSON |
This value set is not currently used
This value set includes codes from the following code systems:
https://www.usps.com/
Code | Display | |
AK | Alaska | |
AL | Alabama | |
AR | Arkansas | |
AS | American Samoa | |
AZ | Arizona | |
CA | California | |
CO | Colorado | |
CT | Connecticut | |
DC | District of Columbia | |
DE | Delaware | |
FL | Florida | |
FM | Federated States of Micronesia | |
GA | Georgia | |
GU | Guam | |
HI | Hawaii | |
IA | Iowa | |
ID | Idaho | |
IL | Illinois | |
IN | Indiana | |
KS | Kansas | |
KY | Kentucky | |
LA | Louisiana | |
MA | Massachusetts | |
MD | Maryland | |
ME | Maine | |
MH | Marshall Islands | |
MI | Michigan | |
MN | Minnesota | |
MO | Missouri | |
MP | Northern Mariana Islands | |
MS | Mississippi | |
MT | Montana | |
NC | North Carolina | |
ND | North Dakota | |
NE | Nebraska | |
NH | New Hampshire | |
NJ | New Jersey | |
NM | New Mexico | |
NV | Nevada | |
NY | New York | |
OH | Ohio | |
OK | Oklahoma | |
OR | Oregon | |
PA | Pennsylvania | |
PR | Puerto Rico | |
PW | Palau | |
RI | Rhode Island | |
SC | South Carolina | |
SD | South Dakota | |
TN | Tennessee | |
TX | Texas | |
UM | U.S. Minor Outlying Islands | |
UT | Utah | |
VA | Virginia | |
VI | Virgin Islands of the U.S. | |
VT | Vermont | |
WA | Washington | |
WI | Wisconsin | |
WV | West Virginia | |
WY | Wyoming |
See the full registry of value sets defined as part of FHIR.
Explanation of the columns that may appear on this page:
Lvl | A few code lists that FHIR defines are hierarchical - each code is assigned a level. For value sets, levels are mostly used to organise codes for user convenience, but may follow code system hierarchy - see Code System for further information |
Source | The source of the definition of the code (when the value set draws in codes defined elsewhere) |
Code | The code (used as the code in the resource instance). If the code is in italics, this indicates that the code is not selectable ('Abstract') |
Display | The display (used in the display element of a Coding). If there is no display, implementers should not simply display the code, but map the concept into their application |
Definition | An explanation of the meaning of the concept |
Comments | Additional notes about how to use the code |