STU 3 Ballot

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v1.6.0: STU 3 Ballot 4). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R4B R4 R3

Codesystem-animal-species.json

Raw JSON (canonical form)

Definition for Code System AnimalSpecies

{
  "resourceType": "CodeSystem",
  "id": "animal-species",
  "meta": {
    "lastUpdated": "2016-08-11T17:02:54.322+10:00",
    "profile": [
      "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/codesystem-shareable-definition"
    ]
  },
  "text": {
    "status": "generated",
    "div": "<div>!-- Snipped for Brevity --></div>"
  },
  "url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/animal-species",
  "identifier": {
    "system": "urn:ietf:rfc:3986",
    "value": "urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.1.231"
  },
  "version": "1.6.0",
  "name": "AnimalSpecies",
  "status": "draft",
  "experimental": true,
  "publisher": "FHIR Project team",
  "contact": [
    {
      "telecom": [
        {
          "system": "other",
          "value": "http://hl7.org/fhir"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "description": "This example value set defines a set of codes that can be used to indicate species of animal patients.",
  "copyright": "This value set includes content from SNOMED CT, which is copyright © 2002+ International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation (IHTSDO), and distributed by agreement between IHTSDO and HL7. Implementer use of SNOMED CT is not covered by this agreement.",
  "caseSensitive": true,
  "valueSet": "http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/animal-species",
  "content": "complete",
  "concept": [
    {
      "code": "canislf",
      "display": "Dog",
      "definition": "Canis lupus familiaris"
    },
    {
      "code": "ovisa",
      "display": "Sheep",
      "definition": "Ovis aries"
    },
    {
      "code": "serinuscd",
      "display": "Domestic Canary",
      "definition": "Serinus canaria domestica"
    }
  ]
}

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.