This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v1.4.0: STU 3 Ballot 3). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
Real-world patient example (id = "f201")
<Order xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> <id value="f201"/> <text><status value="generated"/><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><b>Generated Narrative with Details</b></p><p><b>id</b>: f201</p><p><b>date</b>: 05/03/2013 12:00:00 PM</p><p><b>subject</b>: <a>Roel</a></p><p><b>source</b>: <a>Practitioner/f201</a></p><p><b>target</b>: <a>Juri van Gelder</a></p><p><b>reason</b>: It concerns a one-off order for consultation in order to evaluate the stairs walking ability of Roel. <span>(Details )</span></p><h3>Whens</h3><table><tr><td>-</td><td><b>Code</b></td></tr><tr><td>*</td><td>Normal priority <span>(Details : {SNOMED CT code '394848005' = 'Normal priority (qualifier value)', given as 'Normal priority'})</span></td></tr></table><p><b>detail</b>: Consultation, not yet developed</p></div></text><date value="2013-03-05T12:00:00+01:00"/> <subject><!-- Order was sent to Juri van Gelder for Roel by Dokter Bronsig. --> <reference value="Patient/f201"/> <display value="Roel"/> </subject> <source> <reference value="Practitioner/f201"/> </source> <target> <reference value="Practitioner/f203"/> <display value="Juri van Gelder"/> </target> <reasonCodeableConcept> <text value="It concerns a one-off order for consultation in order to evaluate the stairs walking ability of Roel."/> </reasonCodeableConcept> <!-- <authority> and <payment> were registered in the EHR as "not applicable" --> <when> <code> <coding> <system value="http://snomed.info/sct"/> <code value="394848005"/> <display value="Normal priority"/> </coding> </code> </when> <detail> <display value="Consultation, not yet developed"/> </detail><!-- TODO why is <detail> required? Emergency departmentsk will not have time and only register <reason> --> </Order>
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.