This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v1.4.0: STU 3 Ballot 3). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions
PHR Example
{ "resourceType": "Conformance", "id": "phr", "text": { "status": "generated", "div": "<div>\n \n <p>Prototype Conformance Statement for September 2013 Connectathon</p>\n \n <p>The server offers read and search support on the following resource types:</p>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>Patient</li>\n \n <li>DocumentReference</li>\n \n <li>Condition</li>\n \n <li>DiagnosticReport</li>\n \n </ul>\n \n </div>" }, "name": "PHR Template", "status": "draft", "date": "2013-06-18", "publisher": "FHIR Project", "contact": [ { "telecom": [ { "system": "other", "value": "http://hl7.org/fhir" } ] } ], "description": "Prototype Conformance Statement for September 2013 Connectathon", "kind": "capability", "software": { "name": "ACME PHR Server" }, "fhirVersion": "1.0.0", "_fhirVersion": { "fhir_comments": [ " while the FHIR infrastructure is turning over prior to development, a version is required. Note that this may be rescinded later " ] }, "acceptUnknown": "no", "_acceptUnknown": { "fhir_comments": [ " this is not particularly important for this usage (server doesn't accept any content), but we have to provide it anyway " ] }, "format": [ "json", "xml" ], "_format": [ { "fhir_comments": [ " \n for the connectathon, servers should support both xml and json. Clients can use only one. \n " ] }, null ], "rest": [ { "mode": "server", "documentation": "Protoype server conformance statement for September 2013 Connectathon", "security": { "service": [ { "text": "OAuth" } ], "description": "We recommend that PHR servers use standard OAuth using a standard 3rd party provider. We are not testing the ability to provide an OAuth authentication/authorization service itself, and nor is providing any security required for the connectathon at all" }, "resource": [ { "type": "Patient", "_type": { "fhir_comments": [ " patient resource: read and search for patients the authenticated user has access too " ] }, "interaction": [ { "code": "read" }, { "code": "search-type", "documentation": "When a client searches patients with no search criteria, they get a list of all patients they have access too. Servers may elect to offer additional search parameters, but this is not required" } ] }, { "type": "DocumentReference", "_type": { "fhir_comments": [ " document reference resource: read and search " ] }, "interaction": [ { "code": "read" }, { "code": "search-type" } ], "searchParam": [ { "name": "_id", "type": "token", "documentation": "_id parameter always supported. For the connectathon, servers may elect which search parameters are supported" } ] }, { "fhir_comments": [ " for the purposes of the connectathon, servers can choose which additional resources to support. Here's a couple of examples " ], "type": "Condition", "_type": { "fhir_comments": [ " Condition - let the patient see a list of their Conditions " ] }, "interaction": [ { "code": "read" }, { "code": "search-type" } ], "searchParam": [ { "name": "_id", "type": "token", "documentation": "Standard _id parameter" } ] }, { "type": "DiagnosticReport", "_type": { "fhir_comments": [ " Diagnostic Reports - can be lots of these, so we'll suggest that at least service category should be supported as a search criteria " ] }, "interaction": [ { "code": "read" }, { "code": "search-type" } ], "searchParam": [ { "name": "_id", "type": "token", "documentation": "Standard _id parameter" }, { "name": "service", "type": "token", "documentation": "which diagnostic discipline/department created the report" } ] } ] } ] }
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.